Conceptual Shifts in the Post-Non-Classical Philosophical Understanding of Dialogue: Developing Cultural-Educational Space
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.1/403Keywords:
post-nonclassical science, post-nonclassical methodology, postmodernist , educational discourse, cultural and educational space, philosophical methodology, holistic study of manAbstract
In the scientific literature, there are accents that emphasize certain changes in the functioning of philosophy, which took place in connection with the establishment of the postulates of postmodernism as a new period in the development of culture, as a style of post non-classical scientific thinking, in fact, the content and hierarchy of values positions itself with a sophisticated departure from the classical and non-classical philosophical reflection.
Philosophical and educational understanding of the methodology of research of dialogue and tolerance testified to the relevance of their research in the development of the potential of today’s multicultural education and its growth in the cultural and educational space. Dialogue, dialogics and tolerance are represented by the mechanisms of meaning-making, axiology and praxeology: dialogical cognition of the interpersonal, social-group, societal, planetary world provides a certain "breakthrough" in the worldview-value coordinate system, in external-internal control of growth efficiency and its spiritual dimension.
The axiological, ontological, educational-epistemological aspects of “fitting” a person into a new world context are precisely in the plane of philosophy, enriching the cultural fields of today’s education through integration in goal-setting, content, organizational and managerial conditions for teaching and upbringing value ideals, principles, methods of holistic study of a person and those that are relevant today and provide Homo educandus with a meaning-making knowledge.
References
Agazzi, E. (1991). Chelovek kak predmet filosofskogo poznaniya [Man as a subject of philosophical knowledge]. In I. T. Frolov (Ed.), O chelovecheskom v cheloveka [About human in a human] (pp. 59-80). Politizdat. http://lib.mgppu.ru/OpacUnicode/app/webroot/index.php?url=/notices/index/IdNotice:158592/Source:default
Andreotti, V. (2009). Global education in the “21st century”: Two different perspectives on the “post-“of postmodernism. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 2(2), 5-22. https://www.scienceopen.com/document_file/a1edd56e-b373-49a7-b0c6-c0b39ac7d140/ScienceOpen/s2.pdf
Beyer, L.E., & Liston, D.P. (1992). Discourse or moral action? A critique of postmodernism. Educational Theory, 42(4), 371-393. https://www.colorado.edu/education/sites/default/files/attached-files/Beyer_Liston_Discourse_or_Moral_Action.pdf
Bioland, H.G. (1995). Postmodernism and higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 66(5), 521-559. https://doi.org/10.2307/2943935
Bokova, T.N., & Milovannova, L.A. (2020). Linguo-creative thinking in the context of dialogue of cultures in the postmodern era. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 95, 47-53. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs(2357-1330).2020.11.3
Bondarevskaya, E.V. (2004). Kulturno-obrazovatelnoye prostranstvo vuza kak sreda professionalno-lichnostnogo samorazvitiya studenta [Cultural and educational space of the university as an environment for the professional and personal self-development of a student]: [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Rostov State Pedagogical University. http://nauka-pedagogika.com/pedagogika-13-00-08/dissertaciya-kulturno-obrazovatelnoe-prostranstvo-vuza-kak-sreda-professionalno-lichnostnogo-samorazvitiya-studentov
Buber, M. (1995). Dva obraza very [Two images of faith]. Respublika. https://royallib.com/book/martin_buber/dva_obraza_veri_sbornik_rabot.html
Burbules, N., & Rice, S. (1991). Dialogue across differences: Continuing the conversation. Harvard Educational Review, 61(4), 393-417. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.61.4.yr0404360n31j418
Cissna, K.N., & Anderson, R. (1998). Theorizing about dialogic moments: The Buber‐Rogers position and postmodern themes. Communication Theory, 8(1), 63-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1998.tb00211.x
Constas, M.A. (1998). Research news and comment: The changing nature of educational research and a critique of postmodernism. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027002026
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2013). Chto takoye filosofiya? [What is philosophy? The Institute of Experimental Sociology. https://www.yakaboo.ua/chto-takoe-filosofija-63.html#tab-attributes
Edwards, R., & Usher, R. (2002). Postmodernism and education: Different voices, different worlds. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203425206
Foucault, M. (1994). Slova i veshchi: Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk [Words and things: Archeology of the humanities]. Academia. https://platona.net/load/knigi_po_filosofii/kulturologija/fuko_m_slova_i_veshhi_arkheologija_gumanitarnykh_nauk_1994/16-1-0-1615
Freire, P. (2003). Pedahohika pryhnoblenykh [Pedagogy of the oppressed]. Universe. https://nashformat.ua/products/pedagogika-prygnoblenyh-700890
Gomilko, O. (2014). Pro universalnyy dialoh (Desyatyy svitovyy konhres ISUD “Lyudska istota: yiyi pryroda ta funktsiyi”, 4-9 lypnya 2014 roku, Krayova, Rumuniya) [On universal dialogue ((Tenth ISUD World Congress “Human Being: Its Nature and Functions”, July 4-9, 2014, Craiova, Romania))]. Filosofiya osvity, 1(14), 25-34. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/PhilEdu_2014_1_4
Gorbunova, L.S. (2007). Skladne myslennya yak vidpovid na vyklyk epokhy [Complex thinking as a response to the challenge of the era]. Filosofiya osvity, 1(6), 40-55. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/skladne-mislennya-yak-vidpovid-na-viklik-epohi/viewer
Gritsanov, A.A. (2007). Noveyshiy filosofskiy slovar. Postmodernizm [The newest philosophical dictionary. Postmodernism]. Sovremennyi literator. https://platona.net/load/knigi_po_filosofii/postmodernizm/gricanov_a_a_novejshij_filosofskij_slovar_postmodernizm/54-1-0-597
Gur-Ze-ev, I. (2001). Philosophy of peace education in a postmodern era. Educational Theory, 51(3), 315-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2001.00315.x
Kiyashchenko, L.P., & Moiseev, V.I. (2009). Filosofiya transdistsiplinarnosti [Philosophy of transdisciplinarity]. The Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences. https://iphras.ru/uplfile/root/biblio/2009/Kiyashenko.pdf
Kyvlyuk, O.P. (2014). Hlobalizatsiya ta informatyzatsiya osvity v predmetnomu poli filosofiyi osvity [Globalization and informatization of education in the subject field of philosophy of education]. Humanitarnyy visnyk Zaporizkoyi derzhavnoyi inzhenernoyi akademiyi [Humanitarian Bulletin of Zaporozhia State Engineering Academy], 57, 192-200. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/znpgvzdia_2014_57_19
Lyakh, V.V., & Pazenok, V.S. (1996). Suchasna zarubizhna filosofiya. Techiyi i napryamy [Foreign philosophy today. Flows and directions]. Vakler. https://chtyvo.org.ua/authors/Liakh_Vitalii/Suchasna_zarubizhna_filosofia_Techii_i_napriamky_Khrestomatia/
Malakhov, V.A. (2006). Etyka spilkuvannya [Ethics of communication]. Lybid. http://library.nung.edu.ua/etika-spiilkuvannya.html
Nerubasska, A., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). The demarkation of creativity, talent and genius in humans: A systemic aspect. Postmodern Openings, 11(2), 240-255. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2/172
Nerubasska, A., Palshkov, K., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). A systemic philosophical analysis of the contemporary society and the human: new potential. Postmodern Openings, 11(4), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.4/235
Proleev, S. (2014). “Suspilstvo znan” yak antropolohichna sytuatsiya [“Knowledge society” as an anthropological situation]. Filosofiya osvity, 1(14), 7-24. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/PhilEdu_2014_1_3
Ricoeur, P. (1991). Kakogo roda vyskazyvaniya o cheloveke mogut prepodnosit filosofy [What kind of statements about a person can philosophers present]. In I. T. Frolov (Ed.), O chelovecheskom v cheloveka [About human in a human] (pp. 40-59). Politizdat. https://www.livelib.ru/work/1001423669/reviews-kakogo-roda-vyskazyvaniya-o-cheloveke-mogut-prinadlezhat-filosofam-pol-rikjor
Rorty, R. (1996). Sluchaynost, ironiya i solidarnost [Accident, satire and solidarity]. Russian phenomenological society. https://platona.net/load/knigi_po_filosofii/postmodernizm/rorti-sluchajnost-ironiya-solidarnost
Samchuk, Z.F. (2005). Svitohlyadni azymuty osvitnoyi navihatsiyi v umovakh suchasnoho suspilnoho prostoru Ukrayiny [Worldview azimuths of educational navigation in the conditions of today’s social space of Ukraine]. Filosofiya osvity, 2, 95-109. http://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/2431
Stepanenko, I.V., & Stepanenko, M.D. (2011). Zhyttyeva kompetentnist osobystosti: filosofsko-antropolohichnyy ta sotsiokulʹturnyy vymiry [Life competence of personality: philosophical-anthropological and sociocultural dimensions]. Kharkiv State University of Nutrition and Trade. http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?&I21DBN=EC&P21DBN=EC&S21STN=1&S21REF=10&S21FMT=fullwebr&C21COM=S&S21CNR=20&S21P01=0&S21P02=0&S21P03=I=&S21COLORTERMS=0&S21STR=ВА743772
Troitska, О.М. (2015). Conceptual foundations of dialogue idea impromentation into cultural educational space. Canadian Scientific Journal, 1, 87–92. http://csjournal.ca/conceptual-foundations-of-dialogue-idea-implementation-into-cultural-educational-space/
Uvarkina, O.V. (2013). Priorytet lyudyny yak kharakterna osoblyvist ukrayinskoyi natsionalnoyi systemy osvity: istoryko-filosofskyy kontekst [The priority of man as a characteristic feature of the Ukrainian national education system: historical and philosophical context]. Versus, 2, 23-28. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vers_2013_2_6
Yaroshenko, A.O. (2009). Potentsial i efektyvnist osvitno-informatsiynoyi polityky [Potential and efficiency of educational and information policy]. M. P. Drahomanov National Pedagogical University. http://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/567
Zeeman, L., Poggenpoel, M., Myburgh, C.P.H., & Van Der Linde, N. (2002). An introduction to a postmodern approach to educational research: Discourse analysis. Education, 123(1), 96-102. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA94265110&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=00131172&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7E53fab9b8
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
