Conceptual Shifts in the Post-Non-Classical Philosophical Understanding of Dialogue: Developing Cultural-Educational Space

Authors

  • Olena Troitska Bogdan Khmelnitsky Melitopol State Pedagogical University
  • Valentina Sinelnikova Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts
  • Vitalii Matsko Khmelnytskyi Humanitarian-Pedagogical Academy
  • Liudmyla Vorotniak Khmelnytsky Humanitarian Pedagogical Academy
  • Olesia Fedorova Khmelnytsky Humanitarian-pedagogical academy
  • Tetiana Radzyniak Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.1/403

Keywords:

post-nonclassical science, post-nonclassical methodology, postmodernist , educational discourse, cultural and educational space, philosophical methodology, holistic study of man

Abstract

In the scientific literature, there are accents that emphasize certain changes in the functioning of philosophy, which took place in connection with the establishment of the postulates of postmodernism as a new period in the development of culture, as a style of post non-classical scientific thinking, in fact, the content and hierarchy of values positions itself with a sophisticated departure from the classical and non-classical philosophical reflection.

Philosophical and educational understanding of the methodology of research of dialogue and tolerance testified to the relevance of their research in the development of the potential of today’s multicultural education and its growth in the cultural and educational space. Dialogue, dialogics and tolerance are represented by the mechanisms of meaning-making, axiology and praxeology: dialogical cognition of the interpersonal, social-group, societal, planetary world provides a certain "breakthrough" in the worldview-value coordinate system, in external-internal control of growth efficiency and its spiritual dimension.

The axiological, ontological, educational-epistemological aspects of “fitting” a person into a new world context are precisely in the plane of philosophy, enriching the cultural fields of today’s education through integration in goal-setting, content, organizational and managerial conditions for teaching and upbringing value ideals, principles, methods of holistic study of a person and those that are relevant today and provide Homo educandus with a meaning-making knowledge.

References

Agazzi, E. (1991). Chelovek kak predmet filosofskogo poznaniya [Man as a subject of philosophical knowledge]. In I. T. Frolov (Ed.), O chelovecheskom v cheloveka [About human in a human] (pp. 59-80). Politizdat. http://lib.mgppu.ru/OpacUnicode/app/webroot/index.php?url=/notices/index/IdNotice:158592/Source:default

Andreotti, V. (2009). Global education in the “21st century”: Two different perspectives on the “post-“of postmodernism. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 2(2), 5-22. https://www.scienceopen.com/document_file/a1edd56e-b373-49a7-b0c6-c0b39ac7d140/ScienceOpen/s2.pdf

Beyer, L.E., & Liston, D.P. (1992). Discourse or moral action? A critique of postmodernism. Educational Theory, 42(4), 371-393. https://www.colorado.edu/education/sites/default/files/attached-files/Beyer_Liston_Discourse_or_Moral_Action.pdf

Bioland, H.G. (1995). Postmodernism and higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 66(5), 521-559. https://doi.org/10.2307/2943935

Bokova, T.N., & Milovannova, L.A. (2020). Linguo-creative thinking in the context of dialogue of cultures in the postmodern era. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 95, 47-53. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs(2357-1330).2020.11.3

Bondarevskaya, E.V. (2004). Kulturno-obrazovatelnoye prostranstvo vuza kak sreda professionalno-lichnostnogo samorazvitiya studenta [Cultural and educational space of the university as an environment for the professional and personal self-development of a student]: [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Rostov State Pedagogical University. http://nauka-pedagogika.com/pedagogika-13-00-08/dissertaciya-kulturno-obrazovatelnoe-prostranstvo-vuza-kak-sreda-professionalno-lichnostnogo-samorazvitiya-studentov

Buber, M. (1995). Dva obraza very [Two images of faith]. Respublika. https://royallib.com/book/martin_buber/dva_obraza_veri_sbornik_rabot.html

Burbules, N., & Rice, S. (1991). Dialogue across differences: Continuing the conversation. Harvard Educational Review, 61(4), 393-417. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.61.4.yr0404360n31j418

Cissna, K.N., & Anderson, R. (1998). Theorizing about dialogic moments: The Buber‐Rogers position and postmodern themes. Communication Theory, 8(1), 63-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1998.tb00211.x

Constas, M.A. (1998). Research news and comment: The changing nature of educational research and a critique of postmodernism. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027002026

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2013). Chto takoye filosofiya? [What is philosophy? The Institute of Experimental Sociology. https://www.yakaboo.ua/chto-takoe-filosofija-63.html#tab-attributes

Edwards, R., & Usher, R. (2002). Postmodernism and education: Different voices, different worlds. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203425206

Foucault, M. (1994). Slova i veshchi: Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk [Words and things: Archeology of the humanities]. Academia. https://platona.net/load/knigi_po_filosofii/kulturologija/fuko_m_slova_i_veshhi_arkheologija_gumanitarnykh_nauk_1994/16-1-0-1615

Freire, P. (2003). Pedahohika pryhnoblenykh [Pedagogy of the oppressed]. Universe. https://nashformat.ua/products/pedagogika-prygnoblenyh-700890

Gomilko, O. (2014). Pro universalnyy dialoh (Desyatyy svitovyy konhres ISUD “Lyudska istota: yiyi pryroda ta funktsiyi”, 4-9 lypnya 2014 roku, Krayova, Rumuniya) [On universal dialogue ((Tenth ISUD World Congress “Human Being: Its Nature and Functions”, July 4-9, 2014, Craiova, Romania))]. Filosofiya osvity, 1(14), 25-34. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/PhilEdu_2014_1_4

Gorbunova, L.S. (2007). Skladne myslennya yak vidpovid na vyklyk epokhy [Complex thinking as a response to the challenge of the era]. Filosofiya osvity, 1(6), 40-55. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/skladne-mislennya-yak-vidpovid-na-viklik-epohi/viewer

Gritsanov, A.A. (2007). Noveyshiy filosofskiy slovar. Postmodernizm [The newest philosophical dictionary. Postmodernism]. Sovremennyi literator. https://platona.net/load/knigi_po_filosofii/postmodernizm/gricanov_a_a_novejshij_filosofskij_slovar_postmodernizm/54-1-0-597

Gur-Ze-ev, I. (2001). Philosophy of peace education in a postmodern era. Educational Theory, 51(3), 315-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2001.00315.x

Kiyashchenko, L.P., & Moiseev, V.I. (2009). Filosofiya transdistsiplinarnosti [Philosophy of transdisciplinarity]. The Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences. https://iphras.ru/uplfile/root/biblio/2009/Kiyashenko.pdf

Kyvlyuk, O.P. (2014). Hlobalizatsiya ta informatyzatsiya osvity v predmetnomu poli filosofiyi osvity [Globalization and informatization of education in the subject field of philosophy of education]. Humanitarnyy visnyk Zaporizkoyi derzhavnoyi inzhenernoyi akademiyi [Humanitarian Bulletin of Zaporozhia State Engineering Academy], 57, 192-200. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/znpgvzdia_2014_57_19

Lyakh, V.V., & Pazenok, V.S. (1996). Suchasna zarubizhna filosofiya. Techiyi i napryamy [Foreign philosophy today. Flows and directions]. Vakler. https://chtyvo.org.ua/authors/Liakh_Vitalii/Suchasna_zarubizhna_filosofia_Techii_i_napriamky_Khrestomatia/

Malakhov, V.A. (2006). Etyka spilkuvannya [Ethics of communication]. Lybid. http://library.nung.edu.ua/etika-spiilkuvannya.html

Nerubasska, A., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). The demarkation of creativity, talent and genius in humans: A systemic aspect. Postmodern Openings, 11(2), 240-255. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2/172

Nerubasska, A., Palshkov, K., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). A systemic philosophical analysis of the contemporary society and the human: new potential. Postmodern Openings, 11(4), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.4/235

Proleev, S. (2014). “Suspilstvo znan” yak antropolohichna sytuatsiya [“Knowledge society” as an anthropological situation]. Filosofiya osvity, 1(14), 7-24. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/PhilEdu_2014_1_3

Ricoeur, P. (1991). Kakogo roda vyskazyvaniya o cheloveke mogut prepodnosit filosofy [What kind of statements about a person can philosophers present]. In I. T. Frolov (Ed.), O chelovecheskom v cheloveka [About human in a human] (pp. 40-59). Politizdat. https://www.livelib.ru/work/1001423669/reviews-kakogo-roda-vyskazyvaniya-o-cheloveke-mogut-prinadlezhat-filosofam-pol-rikjor

Rorty, R. (1996). Sluchaynost, ironiya i solidarnost [Accident, satire and solidarity]. Russian phenomenological society. https://platona.net/load/knigi_po_filosofii/postmodernizm/rorti-sluchajnost-ironiya-solidarnost

Samchuk, Z.F. (2005). Svitohlyadni azymuty osvitnoyi navihatsiyi v umovakh suchasnoho suspilnoho prostoru Ukrayiny [Worldview azimuths of educational navigation in the conditions of today’s social space of Ukraine]. Filosofiya osvity, 2, 95-109. http://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/2431

Stepanenko, I.V., & Stepanenko, M.D. (2011). Zhyttyeva kompetentnist osobystosti: filosofsko-antropolohichnyy ta sotsiokulʹturnyy vymiry [Life competence of personality: philosophical-anthropological and sociocultural dimensions]. Kharkiv State University of Nutrition and Trade. http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?&I21DBN=EC&P21DBN=EC&S21STN=1&S21REF=10&S21FMT=fullwebr&C21COM=S&S21CNR=20&S21P01=0&S21P02=0&S21P03=I=&S21COLORTERMS=0&S21STR=ВА743772

Troitska, О.М. (2015). Conceptual foundations of dialogue idea impromentation into cultural educational space. Canadian Scientific Journal, 1, 87–92. http://csjournal.ca/conceptual-foundations-of-dialogue-idea-implementation-into-cultural-educational-space/

Uvarkina, O.V. (2013). Priorytet lyudyny yak kharakterna osoblyvist ukrayinskoyi natsionalnoyi systemy osvity: istoryko-filosofskyy kontekst [The priority of man as a characteristic feature of the Ukrainian national education system: historical and philosophical context]. Versus, 2, 23-28. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vers_2013_2_6

Yaroshenko, A.O. (2009). Potentsial i efektyvnist osvitno-informatsiynoyi polityky [Potential and efficiency of educational and information policy]. M. P. Drahomanov National Pedagogical University. http://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/567

Zeeman, L., Poggenpoel, M., Myburgh, C.P.H., & Van Der Linde, N. (2002). An introduction to a postmodern approach to educational research: Discourse analysis. Education, 123(1), 96-102. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA94265110&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=00131172&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7E53fab9b8

Downloads

Published

2022-01-31

How to Cite

Troitska, O., Sinelnikova, V., Matsko, V., Vorotniak, L., Fedorova, O., & Radzyniak, T. (2022). Conceptual Shifts in the Post-Non-Classical Philosophical Understanding of Dialogue: Developing Cultural-Educational Space. Postmodern Openings, 13(1), 388-407. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.1/403

Issue

Section

Theoretical articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)


Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now