The Use of S. Khoruzhyi's Ideas of Energetic Hesychasm in the Educational Strategies of Postmodern Society

Authors

  • Vitalii Ihnatiev Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Language and Humanities, Donetsk National Medical University
  • Oksana Patlaichuk Candidate of Philosophical Sciences (PhD in Philosophy), Associate Professor of the Department of Psychology, Philosophy and Social-Humanitarian Disciplines, Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding
  • Olga Stupak Senior Lecturer of the Department of Psychology, Philosophy and Social-Humanitarian Disciplines, Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding
  • Andrii Bobryk PhD in Theology, Master of History and Law, Researcher at the Center for the Study of the Heritage of New Martyrs and Confessors of the 20th Century
  • Hennadii Moskalyk Doctor of Science in Philosophy, Professor of the Department of Psychology, Pedagogy and Philosophy, Kremenchuk National University named after Mykhailo Ostrogradskyi
  • Andrii Shymanovych PhD in Theology, Postdoctoral Researcher of the Department of Theology and Religious Studies, Dragomanov Ukrainian State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.1/839

Keywords:

Private spiritual practices, personal pedagogy, deconstruction of religion, coloring and de-ideologization, Khoruzhyi anthropology, Hesychasm, energy, ways of spiritual consciousness

Abstract

Through the prism of the study of the theology of Hesychasm the authors of this article consider the philosophical work of S. Khoruzhyi as a present-day system of non-classical pedagogical paradigm. On the other hand, this paradigm is a philosophically framed historical tradition of Orthodox ontological experience of human existence, which in our time has gone beyond the end of history. Moving beyond confessional boundaries into a universal philosophical meta-anthropological project provides a heuristic effect for the construction of spiritual pedagogy as well as for its synergy with the educational strategies and spiritual practices of the common man of the postmodern era.

The authors sought to identify the basic intentions of religion and postmodern consciousness, and to characterize S. Khoruzhyi's theosophical paradigm in terms of its unconscious and unintentional correlation with the social philosophy of pedagogical of postmodernism. For this purpose we used comparative typological and meaningful methinks, as well as elements of hermeneutics and intertextual analysis.

As a result of the study the authors formulated a number of conclusions and results. The most general one defines the peculiarity of S. Khoruzhogo's narrative, in which the philosopher not only insists but also systematically embeds Hesychasm in the context of the post-non-classical philosophical and pedagogical paradigm. In essence, S. Khoruzhyi forms an alternative to the classical philosophical paradigm, which (even despite the author's formal objections) is open to a horizontal postmodern dialogue and constructed in a personal Hesychasm practice " bottom-up" from -because of "human energy".

References

Anderson, P. S. (2005). Postmodernism and religion. The Routledge companion to postmodernism, 45-50.

Caputo, J. D. (2021). Do radical theologians pray?: A spirituality of the event. Religions, 12(9), 679. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12090679

Chikarkova, M. (2019). Evolyutsiya novitnʹoyi khrystyyansʹkoyi teolohiyi: vid modernizmu do postmodernizmu [The Evolution of the New Christian Theology: from Modernism to Postmodernism]. Volynsky Evangelical, (7), 355-372. DOI:10.33209/2519-4348-2019-7-68

Choi, S. H. (2020). The trinitarian principles of Christian education: Based on the reaction of Neo-Orthodox theology against postmodern challenges. Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 61, 131-164. https://doi.org/10.17968/jcek.2020..61.005

Coleman, S., & Simpson, B. (1999). Unintended consequences?: Anthropology, pedagogy and personhood. Anthropology Today, 15(6), 3-6. https://doi.org/10.2307/2678353

Czerniawska, M., & Szydlo, J. (2020). Conditions for attitudes towards native culture, religion and church and religiously motivated ethics. European Research Studies Journal, 23(4), 123-134. https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/75505

Davis, R. B. (2002). Can there be an "Orthodox" postmodern theology?. https://digitalcollections.tyndale.ca/bitstream/handle/20.500.12730/537/Davis_Richard_2002a.pdf?sequence=1

Derrida, J. (1982). “Différance,” in margins of philosophy. trans. Bass Alan. Britain. The Harvester Press

Feinstein, D. (2008). Energy psychology: A review of the preliminary evidence. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 45(2), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.45.2.199.

Ferrarotti, F. (2020). Faith without dogma: the place of religion in postmodern societies. Routledge.

Hankey, W. J., & Hedley, D. (2017). Deconstructing radical Orthodoxy: Postmodern theology, rhetoric and truth. Routledge.

Harrison, V. S. (2010). Postmodern thought and religion: open‐traditionalism and radical orthodoxy on religious belief and experience. The Heythrop Journal, 51(6), 962-974. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2265.2008.00441.x

Hoodfar, H. (1992). Feminist anthropology and critical pedagogy: The anthropology of classrooms' excluded voices. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'éducation, 303-320. https://doi.org/10.2307/1495298

Hyman, G. (2001). The predicament of postmodern theology: radical orthodoxy or nihilist textualism?. Westminster John Knox Press.

Jabeen, A., & ul Ain, A. Q. (2021). Deconstruction of Christianity in the postmodern age: What remains after that? Journal of Islamic and Religious Studies, 6(2), 1-14.

Kahlon, T. U. M., & Salman, A. (2017). From paradigms of Orthodoxy to postmodernism: The changing perspective of government. Islamabad Policy Research Institute, 17(2), 20-48. https://ipripak.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/art2ijs2017.pdf

Kaye, M. F. (2019). Jewish theology for a postmodern age. Liverpool University Press.

Khoruzhiy, S.S. (2000) O starom i novom [ On the old and the new]. SPb. Aletheia. https://platona.net/load/knigi_po_filosofii/antropologija/khoruzhij_starom_novom/5-1-0-4407

Khoruzhiy, S.S. (2012b) Issledovaniya po isikhastskoy traditsii: V 2 t. T. 1. K fenomenologii askezy [Studies in the Hesychasm tradition]: In Two Volumes. Vol. 2. Toward a phenomenology of ascesis. SPb. Russian Christian Academy of Humanities. https://esxatos.com/horuzhiy-issledovaniya-po-isihastskoy-tradicii-v-2-t

Khoruzhiy, S.S. (2012а) Issledovaniya po isikhastskoy traditsii: V 2 t. T. 1. K fenomenologii askezy [Studies in the Hesychasm Tradition]: In Two Volumes. Vol. 1. Toward a phenomenology of ascesis. SPb. Russian Christian Academy of Humanities. https://esxatos.com/horuzhiy-issledovaniya-po-isihastskoy-tradicii-v-2-t

Lee, R. L. (2021). Death and the postmodern self: Individualism, religion, and the transformation of the modern self. In Making Sense of Death (pp. 85-99). Routledge.

MacDonald, D., & Kirk, D. (1999). Pedagogy, the body and Christian identity. Sport, Education and Society, 4(2), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357332990040202

Mahn, J.A. (2014). Christianity in higher education: Pedagogy, disciplinarity, and the university. Journal of Christian Higher Education, 13(1), 15-29. DOI: 10.1080/15363759.2014.855759

Montessori, M. (2014). Pedagogical anthropology. Montessori Helper.

Nerubasska, A., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). The demarkation of creativity, talent and genius in humans: a systemic aspect. Postmodern Openings, 11(2), 240-255. https://www.lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/po/article/view/2625

Nerubasska, A., Palshkov, K., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). A systemic philosophical analysis of the contemporary society and the human: New potential. Postmodern Openings, 11(4), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.4/235

Noddings, N. (2018). Philosophy of education. Routledge.

Papanikolaou, A. (2007). Orthodoxy, postmodernity, and ecumenism: The difference that divine-human communion makes. Journal of Ecumenical Studies, 42(4), 527-546 https://eclass.uoa.gr/modules/document/file.php/THEOL312/Papanikolaou,%20ORTHODOXY_POSTMODERNITY_AND_ECUMENISM_TH.pdf

Polemis, I. (2022). The Hesychast controversy: Events, personalities, texts and trends. A companion to the intellectual life of the Palaeologan period, 345.

Ruether, R. R. (2006). Interpreting the postmodern: Responses to "radical orthodoxy". International Clark.

Sharp, A. (2012). Orthodox Christians and Islam in the postmodern age (Vol. 16). Brill.

Shevchenko, N., Shypko, M., Dolynska, L., Stroianovska, O., Gorban, G., & Temruk, O. (2022). Ethical consciousness of university students in the context of postmodernism. Postmodern Openings, 13(4), 472-496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.4/528

Širka, Z. (2022). Integrating Hesychast insights into mainstream Western tradition. In Essays in Ecumenical Theology 2 (pp. 103-128). Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004518001_006

Thouki, A. (2019). The role of ontology in religious tourism education – exploring the application of the postmodern cultural paradigm in European religious sites. Religions, 10(12), 649. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10120649

Toti, M. (2008). The Hesychast method of prayer: its anthropological and symbolic significance. International journal for the Study of the Christian Church, 8(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742250701841699

Vanhoozer, K. J. (2003). The Cambridge companion to postmodern theology. Cambridge. UniversityPress

Wenzel, N. G. (2009). Postmodernism and religion. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199588961.013.0010

Wineland, R. K. (2005). Incarnation, image, and story: Toward a postmodern orthodoxy for Christian educators. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 14(1), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10656210509484978

Yuldashov, I., Parpiev, O., Makhmutaliev, A., Tukhtanazarov, I., & Umaralievich, K. U. (2021). Pedagogical bases of formation of physical culture and social culture in Youth. Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research, 10(11), 54-58. DOI : 10.5958/2278-4853.2021.01010.7

Downloads

Published

2024-03-01

How to Cite

Ihnatiev, V., Patlaichuk, O., Stupak, O., Bobryk, A., Moskalyk, H., & Shymanovych, A. (2024). The Use of S. Khoruzhyi’s Ideas of Energetic Hesychasm in the Educational Strategies of Postmodern Society. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 16(1), 591-607. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.1/839