The Demarkation of Creativity, Talent and Genius in Humans: a Systemic Aspect
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2/172Keywords:
concept, structure, substrate, the system-parametric method, organic creature, creative being, artAbstract
A person becomes a part of a system that can “crush” him or her emotionally, sensually, psychologically and physically. At the same time, a person is still a self-organizing system that has a high degree of adaptability. The study aims to consider creativity, talent and genius in human beings, identify their grounds for subordination and manifestation and justify the content of their demarcation in a systemic aspect. The system-parametric method developed by A. Uyemov allows revealing the nature of the creative principle of a person. The basis of this method is a dual definition of the system to which any object can be represented. When defining an object, the concept, structure and substrate are highlighted in it. This hierarchy constitutes integrity in the system under consideration. A systemic model of several objects is proposed to determine the demarcation lines in the properties of person, which are creative, talented and ingenious: a person is a biological creature; a person is a creative human being. Sub-systems are distinguished: “creative and talented people”, “creative, talented and genius people”. Isolating subsystems helps to analyze demarcation lines. Using the system parameters “minimum-non-minimum” systems and “strong-weak” systems shows that the “creative person” system is minimal and strong, as well as more complex than the “human-biological being” system. The “creative person” system includes the other powerful systems listed above. The study proves that the weakest demarcation line in the system is “creative, talented and genius people” since it is difficult to imagine genius without talent.
References
Agamben, G. (2018). Chelovek bez soderzhaniya [Man without content]. New Literary Review.
Arnoldov, A. I. (1993). Vvedenie v kulturologiiu [Introduction to culturology]. The National Academy of Culture.
Bartlett, F. (1958). Thinking: An experimental and social study. Basic Books.
Berdyaev, N. (1936). The problem of person (towards the construction of a Christian anthropology). http://www.berdyaev.com/berdiaev/berd_lib/1936_408.html
Berkeley, J. (2012). About spiritual attachment. Historical and Philosophical Alpersonac, 4, 123–125.
Blackburn, S. (2019). On reading Scruton: Art, truth, and temperament. Philosophy, 94(3), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031819119000251
Bogdanov, A. A. (1989). Tektologiia: (Vseobshchaia organizatsionnaia nauka) [Tectology as a general organizational science]. Economics.
Burno, L. I. (2004). O razvitii koncepcii tvorcheskim samovyrazheniem [On developing the concept of creative expression]. Advances in Science and Technology, 4(23), 31.
Buzhilova, A. P., & Haritonov, A. V. (2009). Perechityvaya Charlza Darvina “Proishozhdenie cheloveka i polovoj otbor”. Darvin kak antropolog [Rereading Charles Darwin’s “The descent of person, and selection in relation to sex” (Darwin as an anthropologist)]. Journal of Moscow University. Anthropology, XXIII(4), 15–24. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/perechityvaya-charlza-darvina-proishozhdenie-cheloveka-i-polovoy-otbor-darvin-kak-antropolog
Byvalkevych, L., Yefremova, O., & Hryshchenko, S. (2020). Developing technical creativity in future engineering educators. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(1), 162175. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/206
Curley, E. (2016). The collected works of Spinoza. Princeton University Press.
Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of person, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray.
Davydov, Y. N. (1968). Iskusstvo kak sotsiologicheskii fenomen. K kharakteristike estetiko-politicheskikh vzgliadov Platona i Aristotelia [Art as a sociological phenomenon. On the description of aesthetic and political views of Plato and Aristotle]. Science.
Feyerabend, P. K. (1975). Against method. Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. New Left Books.
Gelen, A. O. (1988). O sistematike antropologii. Problema cheloveka v zapadnoj filosofii [On the systematicity of anthropology]. http://filosof.historic.ru/books/item/f00/s00/z0000341/index.shtml
Gerasymova, I., Maksymchuk, B., Bilozerova, M., Chernetska, Y., Matviichuk, T., Solovyov, V., & Maksymchuk, I. (2019). Forming professional mobility in future agricultural specialists: the sociohistorical context. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 11(4), 345361. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/195
Guilford, J. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
Holton, G. (1981). Thematische analyse der wissenschafti [Thematic analysis of science]. Suhrkamp.
Isrow, Z. (2017). Defining art and its future. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 6(6), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v6i6.1207
Jung, C. (1996). Sobranie sochinenii [Collected edition]. Canon.
Kagan, M. N. (1996). Postmodernism as the birth of a new type of culture. International Yearbook of Aesthetics, 1, 47–58.
Kant, I. (2007). Estetyka [Aesthetics]. Avers.
Khrenov, N. A. (2016). Filosofiya iskusstva v situacii vozniknoveniya koncepta kultury [The philosophy of art in the сontext of emerging the concept of culture]. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/filosofiya-iskusstva-v-situatsii-vozniknoveniya-kontsepta-kultury-nachalo/viewer
Kleiberg, Y. A. (2016). Kreativnaya deviantologiya [Creative deviantology]. IIU MGOU.
Kozlovskyi, S., Grynyuk, R., Baidala, V., Burdiak, V., & Bakun, Y. (2019). Economic security management of Ukraine in conditions of European integration. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 15(3), 137153. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2019.15-3.10
Leontev, A. N. (1960). O formirovanii sposobnostei [On the development of capabilities]. Issues of Psychology, 1, 7–17. http://ebooks.grsu.by/psihologia/leontev-a-n-o-formirovanii-sposobnostej.htm
Lismann, K. (2009). The age of significant events. In E. Y. Rezhabeka, B. V. Markova, & Y. M. Shilkova (Eds.), Languages of Philosophy. Publishing House of Saint Petersburg University.
Markov, B. V. (2013). Filosofiya i iskusstva kak praktiki obrazovaniya cheloveka [Philosophy and art as a practice of human education]. Journal of Saint Petersburg State University. Series 17: Philosophy and Conflictology, 1, 5–11. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/filosofiya-i-iskusstvo-kak-praktiki-obrazovaniya-cheloveka
Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and personality. Harper & Row.
Melnyk, N., Bidyuk, N., Kalenskyi, A., Maksymchuk. B., Bakhmat, N., Matviienko, O., Matviichuk T., Solovyov V., Golub N., & Maksymchuk, I. (2019). Models and organizational characteristics of preschool teachers’ professional training in some EU countries and Ukraine. Zbornik: Institut za Pedagoška Istraživanjа, 51(1), 46–93. http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/Article.aspx?id=0579-64311901046M#.XvHg5ZozY_4
Mesarović, M. (1972). Organizational structure: Cybernetic systems foundation. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Mishchenko, L. V. (2015). Individualnost podrostkov v ramkah sistemnogo issledovaniya s pozicii pola i gender [The individuality of adolescents in a systematic study from the perspective of sex and gender]. Direct MEDIA.
Nadler, S. (1999). Spinoza: A life. Cambridge University Press.
Oancea, R. I. (2018). Art and politics in posthuman paradigm. Annals of the University of Bucharest. Philosophy series, LXVII(1), 185–204.
Ortega y Gasset, J. (2000). Kamen i nebo [Stone and sky]. Grant.
Plessner, H. (2004). Stupeni organicheskogo i chelovek: Vvedenie v filosofskuyu antropologiyu [Organic degrees and human: an introduction to philosophical anthropology]. ROSSPEN.
Prozumentik, K. V. (2018). Siate iniperosy: Poetika bezdejstviya Dzhordzho Agambena [Siate inoperosi: The poetics of the inaction of Giorgio Agamben]. Journal of Perm National Research Polytechnic University. Series: Culture. History. Philosophy. Law, 4, 7–19. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/siate-inoperosi-poetika-bezdeystviya-dzhordzho-agambena/viewerC/ 7
Punchenko, O., & Doroshenko, P. (2004). O estestvennyh predposylkah tvorcheskoj odarennosti lichnosti [On natural prerequisites for creative talent of personality]. Advances in Science and Technology, 4(23), 26–35.
Reichert, K. V. (2013). Filosofsko-metodolohichni zasady dvoistoho systemno-parametrychnoho modeliuvannia [Philosophical and methodological principles of dual system-parametric modelling]. PhD Thesis. Odesa I. Mechnykov National University, Odesa. http://194.44.11.130/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?C21COM=S&I21DBN=EC&P21DBN=EC&S21FMT=fullwebr&S21ALL=%28%3C.%3EA%3D%D0%A0%D0%B0%D0%B9%D1%85%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%82%20%D0%9A$%3C.%3E%29&FT_REQUEST=&FT_PREFIX=&Z21ID=&S21STN=1&S21REF=10&S21CNR=20
Roerich, N. (2018). Vechnaia zhizn [Eternal life]. Alphabet.
Sadovskiy, V. N., & Lekterskiy, V. A. (1960). O printsipakh issledovaniia sistem [On the principles of researching systems]. Issues of Philosophy, 8, 67–79.
Schelling, F. V. (1966). Filosofiia iskusstva [The philosophy of art]. Thought.
Schopenhauer, А. (2001). Sobranie sochinenii v shesti tomakh [Collected works issued in six volumes]. TERRA-Book Club.
Sebalo, L., & Teslenko, T. (2020). Future teacher training for selfeducation activity in physical education at elementary school. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(1), 105119. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/202
Sheremet, M., Leniv, Z., Loboda, V., & Maksymchuk, B. (2019) The development level of smart information criterion for specialists’ readiness for inclusion implementation in education. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 72, 273285. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v72i4.2561
Skorkin, O. A. (2014). Dialog hudozhnika i zritelya [A dialogue between an artist and a spectator]. A Philosophical Thought, 6, 15–38. https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=12575
Soyarslan, S. (2019). Two ethical ideals in Spinoza’s ethics: The free person and the wise person. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 5(3), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2019.19
Turkina, V. G., & Antonova, E. L. (2019). Massovaya kultura v ee sovremennyh fenomenah [Mass culture in its modern phenomena]. Science. Culture. Art, 3(23), 28–44. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/massovaya-kultura-v-ee-sovremennyh-fenomenah
Uyemov, A. I. (1978). Sistemnyj podhod i obshaya teoriya sistem [A systemic approach and a general theory of systems]. Thought.
Uyemov, A. I., Tsofnas, A., & Saraeva, I. (2001). Obshaya teoriya sistem dlya gumanitariev: uchebnoe posobie dlya gumanitariev [A general theory of systems for soft scientists]. http://www.philosof.onu.edu.ua/elb/uemov/system_general_theory_for_guperson.pdf.
Vidmenko, M. O. (2013). Deviantnist tvorchoi osobystosti [The deviance of creative personality]. Scientific Knowledge, Methodology and Technology, 1(30), 25–31. http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?I21DBN=LINK&P21DBN=UJRN&Z21ID=&S21REF=10&S21CNR=20&S21STN=1&S21FMT=ASP_meta&C21COM=S&2_S21P03=FILA=&2_S21STR=Npmt_2013_1_7
Von Bertalanffy, L. (1969). General system theory – a critical review. In V. N. Sadovskiy & E. G. Yudin (Eds.), Studies on general theory of systems (pp. 23–82). Progress.
Voskresenskaya, M. V. (2005). Simvolizm kak mirovidenie Serebrennogo veka: sociokulturnye faktory formirovaniya obshestvennogo soznaniya rossijskoj kulturnoj elity rubezha XIX – XX vekov [Symbolism as the worldview of the Silver Age: sociocultural factors in the development of public consciousness of the Russian cultural elite at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries]. Logos.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1956). Problema obucheniia i umstvennogo razvitiia v shkolnom vozraste [The problem of learning and intellectual development at school age]. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problema-obucheniya-i-umstvennogo-razvitiya-v-shkolnom-vozraste/viewer
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
