Psychosocial Dimensions of Power in the Organization

Authors

  • Georgiana CORCACI Petre Andrei University of Iasi, Romania

Keywords:

organizational behavior, leadership, power in organizations, motivational persistence, social influence

Abstract

New realities social, economic and political dictates the manner in which the management, tasks are completed and demonstrated competence, reliability and value leaders (Drucker, 1973). Social psychology perspective defines leadership as the ratio of communication, knowing each other, socioaffective relations of subordination and dependence between people. Organizational psychology considers a form of behavior involving dynamic leader traits, needs, attitudes and characteristics of subordinates, the nature of the organization, purpose, structure, tasks, organizational, social, economic and political. At the individual level, the power elements are rank individual position and the possibility of pursuing and obtaining information (Foucalt, 1978 McNay, 1994). The purpose of research is to identify the profile leaders by analyzing the type of leadership and motivational persistence level. Also, we are interested to identify the influence of motivational persistence on labor relations and the style of leadership. To accomplish research goals and objectives we intend to use these tools: questionnaire motivational persistence, persistence motivational factors questionnaire, questionnaire transactionaltransformational leadership style. These tools will be used on a sample of 110 subjects. On a pragmatic level, the work provides a model for the assessment of effective networking in the workplace.

References

Chazel, F. (1997). Puterea. In Raymond Boudon, Tratat de sociologie, Bucureşti: Editura Humanitas, p. 102.

Constantin, T., Iarcuczewicz, I., Constantin L., Fodorea, A., & Caldare, L. (2007). Persistenţa motivaţională şi operaţionalizarea ei în vederea evaluării potenţialului motivaţional individual. Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii ”A. I. Cuza” din Iaşi, Psihologie, XVI, Studii empirice, pp. 5- 6.

De Vissscher, P. (2001). Animatori, Lideri, Monitori şi diferenţierea rolurilor. In De isscher Pierre, Neculau, Adrian, Dinamica grupurilor, Bucureşti: Editura Polirom, p. 68.

Finkelstein, S. (1992). Power in Top Management Teams: Dimentions, Measurement and Validation. Academy of Management Journal, 8.

Heifetz, A., R., &. Donald, L., L. (1998). The Work of Leadership. In Harvard Business Review on Leadership, Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.

Hendrikse, G. (2003). Economics and Management of Organizations. Coordination, Motivation and Strategy. Berkshire: The McGraw-Hill, Education, p. 134.

Hofstede, G. (1996). Managementul structurilor multiculturale. Bucureşti: Editura Economică, p. 38.

Jeffrey, P. (1981). Power in Organizations. MarshfIeld: Pitman Publishing, pp. 59-60.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-26

How to Cite

CORCACI, G. (2018). Psychosocial Dimensions of Power in the Organization. Anuarul Universitatii Petre Andrei Din Iasi - Fascicula: Asistenta Sociala, Sociologie, Psihologie, 19, 73-88. Retrieved from https://www.lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/upa-law/article/view/848

Most read articles by the same author(s)

> >>