Informal Environmental Education and Green Citizenship: Greenfluencers and Romanian Gen Z’s Eco-Conscious Social Media Practices

Authors

  • Adina Baya Department of Governance Studies, West University of Timişoara, Romania
  • Corina Turșie Department of Communication Sciences, West University of Timişoara, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/17.3/1029

Keywords:

informal environmental education, green citizenship, social media, greenfluencers, eco-conscious attitudes, youth engagement

Abstract

This empirical study investigates how social media “greenfluencers” – content creators who promote environmental awareness and sustainable living through their online platforms – contribute to informal environmental education and the shaping of green citizenship among Romanian Gen Z by motivating the display of eco-conscious attitudes and environmental responsibility online. Through focus group discussions and a survey of 395 respondents, we assessed young people’s trust in greenfluencers, their criteria for following environmental content creators, and their willingness to post such content themselves as part of their green civic identity. Results show that, despite heavy daily engagement with social media and consistent following of influencers, most Romanian Gen Zers feel that greenfluencers have limited success in raising awareness and changing behaviors. Although many respondents feel empowered to tackle climate change, they hesitate to share environmental content on their social media pages. This reluctance highlights their distrust of social media platforms and their wish to avoid being perceived as influencers. Our findings reveal important challenges for leveraging social media in informal environmental education and fostering active green citizenship among youth in Romania.

References

Anderson, K. J. (2024). What is news? Exploring differences in how younger and older cohorts use news in today’s media environment. Communication Research and Practice, 11(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2024.2344997

American Psychological Association (APA). (2023). Speaking of Psychology: Why our attention spans are shrinking, with Gloria Mark, PhD. APA Podcasts. https://www.apa.org/news/podcasts/speaking-of-psychology/attention-spans

Balaban, D., & Mustăţea, M. (2019). Users’ perspective on the credibility of social media influencers in Romania and Germany. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 21(1), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.21018/rjcpr.2019.1.269

Balaban, D., Mustăţea, M., Culic, L., Iancu, R.I. & Pavelea, A. (2020). What determines young people to follow influencers? The role of perceived information quality and trustworthiness on users’ following intentions. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 22 (3), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.21018/rjcpr.2020.3.306

Boerman, S. C., Meijers, M. H. C., & Zwart, W. (2022). The importance of influencer-message congruence when employing greenfluencers to promote pro-environmental behavior. Environmental Communication, 16(7), 920–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2115525

Bootrach, P., Thiengkamol, N., & Thiengkamol, T. K. (2015). Environmental education strategy. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 14(4), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2015.1096223

Breves, P., & Liebers, N. (2022). #Greenfluencing. The impact of parasocial relationships with social media influencers on advertising effectiveness and followers’ pro-environmental intentions. Environmental Communication, 16(6), 773–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2109708

Chuan, C., Seelig, M., Tsai, W. S., & Tao, W. (2024). Eco-warrior: a theory-based mobile app intervention for forming and sustaining pro-environmental habits. Mobile Media & Communication, 13(1), 234-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579241271066

De Witte, M. (2022). Gen Z are not ‘coddled.’ They are highly collaborative, self-reliant and pragmatic, according to new Stanford-affiliated research. Stanford Report. https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2022/01/know-gen-z

Dean, H. (2001). Green citizenship. Social policy and administration, 35(5), 490- 505. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.t01-1-00249

Dekoninck, H., & Schmuck, D. (2022). The mobilizing power of influencers for pro-environmental behavior intentions and political participation. Environmental Communication, 16(4), 458–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2027801

Deliana, Y., & Rum, I. A. (2019). How does perception on green environment across generations affect consumer behavior? A neural network process. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 43(4), 358-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12515

Dragolea, L. L., Butnaru, G. I., Kot, S., Zamfir, C.G., Nuţă, A.C., Nuţă, F.M., Cristea, D.S. & Ştefănică, M. (2023). Determining factors in shaping the sustainable behavior of the generation Z consumer. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1096183

Dobson, A. (1995). Green Political Thought (2nd ed.). Routledge

Eichorn, J., Solaz, A. G., & White, P. (2022). Shifting paradigms. Public perceptions of economic policy in shaping the climate crisis. Open Society Foundations. https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/publications/shifting-paradigms

European Commission. (2020). Attitudes of Europeans towards the Environment. https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2257

ENEC - European Network for Environmental Citizenship (2018). Defining Environmental Citizenship. https://enec-cost.eu/our-approach/enec-environmental-citizenship/

Gabrielson, T. (2008). Green citizenship: a review and critique. Citizenship Studies, 12(4), 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020802184275

IPCC - The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2022). IPCC sixth assessment report. Working group III: Mitigation of climate change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/

Huber, B., Lepenies, R., Quesada Baena, L., & Allgaier, J. (2022). Beyond individualized responsibility attributions? How eco influencers communicate sustainability on TikTok. Environmental Communication, 16(6), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2131868

Hutchinson, A. (2022, August 24). New report show that reels are generating the most reach on Instagram. Social media today. https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/new-report-show-that-reels-are-generating-the-most-reach-on-instagram/630454/

IRES - Institutul Român pentru Evaluare şi Strategie (2023). Schimbări climatice şi încălzire globală. (ediţia a-3-a). Percepţii, atitudini şi comportamente ale românilor. https://ires.ro/articol/446/schimbari-climatice--i-inc%C4%83lzire-global%C4%83-(edi%C8%9Bia-a-3-a,-2023)

Jung, J., Petkanic, P., Nan, D., & Kim, J. H. (2020). When a girl awakened the world: A user and social message analysis of Greta Thunberg. Sustainability, 12(7), https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072707

Kapoor, P.S., Balaji, M.S., & Jiang, Y. (2023). Greenfluencers as agents of social change: the effectiveness of sponsored messages in driving sustainable consumption. European Journal of Marketing, 57(2), 533-561. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2021-0776

Kim, E., & Drumwright, M. (2016). Engaging consumers and building relationships in social media: How social relatedness influences intrinsic vs. extrinsic consumer motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 970-979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.025

Knupfer, H., Neureiter, A. & Matthes, J. (2023). From social media diet to public riot? Engagement with “greenfluencers” and young social media users’ environmental activism. Computers in Human Behavior, 139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107527

Lapresta-Romero, S., Becker, L., Hernández-Ortega, B., Terho, H., & Franco, J. L. (2024). Getting the recipe right: how content combinations drive social media engagement behaviors. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 0(0) https://doi.org/10.1177/1094996824125169

Machin, A., & Tan, E. (2022). Green European citizenship? Rights, duties, virtues, practices and the European green deal. European Politics and Society, 25(1), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2022.2118984

MFB (2024). Media FactBook Romania. https://mediafactbook.ro/#download

Mihăilă, M., Jităreanu, A. F., & Costuleanu, C. L. (2022). The environmental values - A study on the students’ perception, attitudes and behaviours. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 14(1), 465-483. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/14.1/529

Munnukka, J., Uusitalo, O., & Toivonen, H. (2016). Credibility of a peer endorser and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(3), 182-192. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-11-2014-1221

Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers' perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191

Olbermann, Z., Mayer, F., & Schramm, H. (2024). Greenfluencing through the power of emotions? Impact of message frames and emotionally matching background music on the effectiveness of influencers’ environmental communication. Social Media + Society, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241254381

Oliver Wyman Forum. (2023). A Gen Z report. What business needs to know about the generation changing everything. https://www.oliverwymanforum.com/content/dam/oliver-wyman/ow-forum/template-scripts/a-gen-z/pdf/A-Gen-Z-Report.pdf

Oxley, L. & Morris, P. (2013). Global citizenship: A typology for distinguishing its multiple conceptions. British Journal of Educational Studies, 61(3), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2013.798393

Pashby, K., Da Costa, M., Stein, S., & Andreotti, V. (2020). A meta-review of typologies of global citizenship education. Comparative Education, 56(2), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2020.1723352

Pittman, M., & Abell, A. (2021). More trust in fewer followers: diverging effects of popularity metrics and green orientation social media influencers. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 56(1), 70-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2021.05.

Petrescu-Mag, R. M., Petrescu, D. C., Iván, A., & Tenter, A. R. (2023). An intergenerational reading of climate change-health concern nexus: a qualitative study of the millennials’ and gen z participants’ perceptions. BMC Public Health, 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15353-z

Schattle, H. (2008). Education for global citizenship: illustrations of ideological pluralism and adaptation. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(1), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310701822263

Sharma, A. P. (2021). Consumers’ purchase behaviour and green marketing: A synthesis, review and agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(6), 1217–1238. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12722

Stahl, C. C., & Literat, I. (2022). #GenZ on TikTok: the collective online self-portrait of the social media generation. Journal of Youth Studies, 26(7), 925–946. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2022.2053671

Stock, P. V., Darby, D. B., & Meyer, K. (2017). Teaching the environment with collaboration: Photo essays across disciplines. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 17(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2017.1348273

UNDP (2024). People’s climate vote 2024. https://www.undp.org/publications/peoples-climate-vote-2024

UNESCO (n.d). UNESCO Green citizens. https://www.unesco.org/en/green-citizens

Toma, S.G., Grădinaru, C.,Hudea, O.S., & Modreanu, A. (2023) Perceptions and attitudes of generation Z students towards the responsible management of smart cities. Sustainability, 15(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813967

WeAreSocial (2023). Digital 2023. Global overview report. https://wearesocial.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Digital-2023-Global-Overview-Report.pdf

Xiao, M., Wang, R., & Chan-Olmsted, S. (2018). Factors affecting YouTube influencer marketing credibility: a heuristic-systematic model. Journal of Media Business Studies, 15(3), 188–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2018.1501146

Downloads

Published

2025-09-19

How to Cite

Baya, A., & Turșie, C. (2025). Informal Environmental Education and Green Citizenship: Greenfluencers and Romanian Gen Z’s Eco-Conscious Social Media Practices. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 17(3), 417-450. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/17.3/1029

Issue

Section

Reform, Change and Innovation in Education