The Influence of Educational Level on Self-efficacy, Introversion, and Agreeableness: an Interpersonal Difference Analysis

Authors

  • Roxana Chiș Center of Research Development and Innovation in Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences Psychology and Social Work, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Arad, Romania
  • Sonia Ignat Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Arad, Romania
  • Regis Roman Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Arad, Romania
  • Edgar Demeter Center of Research Development and Innovation in Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences Psychology and Social Work, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Arad, Romania
  • Sabin Chiș Faculty of Food Engineering Tourism and Environment Protection, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Arad, Romania
  • Dana Rad Center of Research Development and Innovation in Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences Psychology and Social Work, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Arad, Romania http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6754-3585
  • Felix Arion Department of Economic Sciences University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine from Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.2/872

Keywords:

level of education, psychological traits, self-efficacy, introversion, agreeableness

Abstract

This research examines the impact of educational attainment on psychological traits such as self-efficacy, introversion, and agreeableness. The primary goal of this study is to see whether there are significant variations in these traits according to the educational level of the participants and to identify relationships between educational level and psychological traits. A number of hypotheses were formulated, anticipating that self-efficacy would be higher in participants with higher levels of education, while introversion would be lower. Agreeableness was also hypothesized to be influenced by level of education, with higher means in those with higher levels of education. To test these hypotheses, a questionnaire was completed by a sample of 238 respondents, who were grouped according to their level of education. Data analysis revealed significant differences between education groups on self-efficacy, introversion, and agreeableness. The findings were explored in light of current ideas, with a focus on their theoretical and practical consequences. Finally, the study underlines the role of education in forming personality characteristics and the necessity for more research in this area. The study's limitations were also acknowledged, and future research objectives were offered to help us better grasp this complicated link.

Author Biography

Dana Rad, Center of Research Development and Innovation in Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences Psychology and Social Work, Aurel Vlaicu University of Arad, Arad, Romania

 

Faculty of Educational Sciences, Psychology and Social Sciences

References

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (pp. ix, 604). W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.

Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44(6), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.001

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6(4), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1992.6.4.343

Dughi, D., & Bold, I. (2022). Language teaching and emotional intelligence developing at preschool age, through fairy tales and stories. Journal Plus Education, 31(2), 83-96. https://uav.ro/jour/index.php/jpe/article/view/1770

Dughi, T., & Ianc, R. (2022). Students’self-efficacy and feurstein instrumental enrichment. Journal Plus Education, 30(1), 53-66.

Edward Watkins Jr., C., Vîşcu, L. I., Cădariu, I. E., & Žvelc, M. (2022). Problematic self-efficacy inferences in beginning psychotherapy supervisees: Identification and management. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 52(2), 109-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-021-09525-4

Eysenck, H.J. (1991). Dimensions of personality. In J. Strelau, A. Angleitner (eds), Explorations in temperament. Perspectives on individual differences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0643-4_7

Gemene, C., Unguru, E., & Sandu, A. (2018). Sociological perspectives on the quality of life correlated with the state of health. Postmodern Openings, 9(3), 76-98. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/37

Graziano, W. G., Hair, E. C., & Finch, J. F. (1997). Competitiveness mediates the link between personality and group performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1394–1408. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1394

Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2008). Subjective well-being. In Handbook of emotions, 3rd ed (pp. 471–484). The Guilford Press.

Mowen, J. C. (2000). The 3M model of motivation and personality: Theory and empirical applications to consumer behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.

Nave, T., & Roman, A. (2019). Is positive thinking magical? In V. Chis, & I. Albulescu (Eds.), Education, Reflection, Development – ERD 2018, vol 63. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 259-265). Future Academy. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.06.33

Rad, D., Redeș, A., Roman, A., Egerău, A., Lile, R., Demeter, E., Dughi, T., Ignat, S., Balaș, E., Maier, R., Kiss, C., Mărineanu, V., Bocoș, M., Bâtcă-Dumitru, G. C., Cuc, L. D., Vancu, G., Rad, G., & Chiș, R. (2023). The use of theory of planned behavior to systemically study the integrative-qualitative intentional behavior in Romanian preschool education with network analysis. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 1017011. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017011

Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2009). Self-efficacy theory. In Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 35–53). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in Health Psychology: A User’s Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs (pp. 35-37). Windsor: NFER-NELSON.

Viscu, L. I., Cornelia-Ecaterina, C., Roxana, C., & Ioana-Eva, C. (2017). The role of emotional intelligence in online learning. In The International Symposium of Research and Applications in Psychology, 24th edition, with the theme “Cognitive characteristics of transdisciplinarity. Applications in psychology and psychotherapy,” Timisoara, At Timisoara, and Volume: SICAP 24 PROCEEDINGS.

Watkins Jr., C. E., Vîşcu, L. I., & Cadariu, I. E. (2021). Psychotherapy supervision research: On roadblocks, remedies, and recommendations. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, 23(1), 8-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2021.1881139

Downloads

Published

2024-05-31

How to Cite

Chiș, R., Ignat, S., Roman, R., Demeter, E., Chiș, S., Rad, D., & Arion, F. (2024). The Influence of Educational Level on Self-efficacy, Introversion, and Agreeableness: an Interpersonal Difference Analysis. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 16(2), 569-580. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.2/872

Issue

Section

Psycho-Social Competencies & Educational Strategies