The Image of Women – a Sociological analysis of Social Stereotypes

Authors

  • Iulian Apostu Romanian Academy, Institute of Sociology
  • Otilia Apostu Institute of Educational Science (ISE), Bucharest

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/15.4/805

Keywords:

gender, woman, man, gender stereotypes, marital inequality, conjugality

Abstract

Nowadays, the image of the woman assimilates all valences, from the submissive and depreciated woman to the independent, dominant or the powerful woman. For a very long time, the imperative power of traditions provided a framed image of the status and roles associated with each gender, obviously favoring the male status. The social evolution of the last decades has caused the force of tradition to consistently lose its power and the gap between the male and the female status to shrink and, in certain communities, even reverse the power ratio. The contemporary social moment surprises two large categories of situations: a female status anchored for a long time in the struggle to obtain equity in the couple and a male status, predominantly traditionally socialized. The male is surprised by the fact that the tradition can no longer support the status culture in which he was educated. Thus, the changing of a behavior, as Bandura (1977) states, involves the changing of old thinking systems.

However, this process stage is more advanced for women; the applicability thereof is difficult because of the male opposition. The changing of cognitions is therefore more difficult to achieve, which is why women try to act on behaviors while men, abandoned by the protection of traditions, re-argue their status by appealing to social stereotypes about women, which, being widespread, appear as generally legitimate arguments. The study aims to analyze the social opinions regarding the social stereotypes about women.

References

Apostu I. (2022). Legalizarea uniunii consensuale în România – aspecte socio-juridice şi consecinţe sociale. Revista Română de Sociologie, 5-6/2022-1

Bandura A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall

Bărăian, A. M.. (2022). Essay on the feminine essence and gender equality implications. Drepturile Omului, 2, 2022. https://revista.irdo.ro/pdf/2022/revista_2_2022/04_Baraian.pdf

De Beauvoir, S (2004), Al doilea sex. vol. I, II, Editura UNIVERS, Bucureşti

Direcţia Rutieră. (2021). Buletinul siguranţei rutiere, 2020. Bucureşti: Institutul de Cercetare şi Prevenire a Criminalităţii; link: https://www.politiaromana.ro/files/pages_ files/Buletinul_sigurantei_rutiere_raport_anul_2020.pdf

Dubar, C. (2001) La crise des identités. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France

Festinger, L. (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press

Mitrofan I., Ciupercă C. (1998). Incursiuni în psihosociologia şi psihosexologia cuplului şi a familiei, Bucureşti, Editura Şansa

Mooyaart, J.E., Liefbroer, A.C. (2016). The influence of parental education on timing and type of union formation: Changes over the life course and over time in the Netherlands. Demography 53, 885–919 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-016-0473-y

Pasti V., (2003). Ultima inegalitate. Relaţii de gen în România, Iaşi, Editura Polirom

Pease A., & Pease, B. (2001). De ce bărbaţii se uită la meci şi femeile se uită în oglindă, Bucureşti, Editura Curtea Veche

Popescu, L. (2004). Politica sexelor [Gender politics]. Maiko.

Sandu A., Huidu A., Frunza A., (2020). Social perception of ethical values in the Romanian post-secular society. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 55:105- 120.

Smiley G., (2005), Când unu plus unu fac noi, Bucureşti, Editura Curtea Veche

Roussel, L. (1989). La famille incertaine. Odile Jacob.

Tudose, C. (2005). Gen şi personalitate. Psihologie feminină şi psihologie masculină, Bucureşti, Editura Tritonic

Seligman, M. E. (2002). Positive psychology, positive prevention, and positive therapy. Handbook of positive psychology, 2(2002), 3-12.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-28

How to Cite

Apostu, I., & aPOSTU, O. C. (2023). The Image of Women – a Sociological analysis of Social Stereotypes. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 15(4), 474-488. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/15.4/805

Issue

Section

Psycho-Social Competencies & Educational Strategies