Supporting the Process of Designing and Planning Heritage and Landscape by Spatializing Data on a Single Support Platform. Case Study: Romania


  • Atena-Ioana Gârjoabă "Ion Mincu" University of Architecture and Urbanism
  • Cerasella Crăciun



data handling, support platform, natural heritage, built heritage, cultural landscape


Data handling is a general objective of education, regardless of the educational level (middle school, high school, university or postgraduate) and branch. Being at the intersection between the humanities and the exact sciences, the field of design requires a continuous summation and overlapping of information from specialists. Obtaining data is essential for perceiving the current situation, but also for adapting the solution proposed in the planning process to the given situation, to the particularities and main characteristics of the context. How difficult it is to obtain information, but especially their overlap and correlation to obtain indicators specific to target areas, depends in most cases on the experience of the specialist in the field, but for a recent graduate, the training received during the years of university training is perhaps his most important support. However, there may be data that are predominantly available during university training and data that can be obtained predominantly outside the academic environment (financial data, communication with public institutions). The paper describes a proposal for a support platform to assist the process of architectural design, urban planning and landscaping in Romania, but which can also support adjacent studies and analyzes. The purpose of the platform is to support the design and planning process of heritage and landscape, architecture and urban planning, by simplifying the data acquisition process and also directing the design/planning process to a long-term perspective, which is based on resilient solutions for natural and built heritage and for the conservation of the local cultural landscape.


Acasandre, A., & Crăciun, C. (2015). "The Right to the Landscape" and "the Landscape Right". Landscape as a Tool of Meta-ethic and Multidimensional Education in the Knowledge Society [Conference presentation]. LUMEN International Conference – Multidimensional Education and Professional Development. Ethical Values – MEPDEV 2015.

Bachour, B. (2002). Digital Urban Planning. The Use of GIS in Urban Planning [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Department of Architecture, Urban Planning Division.

Bibri, S. E. (2019). The anatomy of the data‑driven smart sustainable city: instrumentation, datafication, computerization and related applications. Journal of Big Data, 6(59), 1-42.

Cao, X., Wang, M., & Liu, X. (2020). Application of Big Data Visualization in Urban Planning. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 440.

Chakraborty, A., Wilson, B., Sarraf, S., & Jana, A. (2015). Open data for informal settlements: Toward a user's guide for urban managers and planners. Journal of Urban Management, 4, 74-91.

Coll, E., Ruiz-Lopez, F., & Martinez-Llario, J. (2012). Planning and development of new data model for urban scales. The BTU. Procedia Technology, 1, 10-14.

Crăciun, C. (2008). Urban Metabolism. The Uncoventional Approach of The Urban Organism. Ion Mincu Publising House.

Crăciun, C. (2014). “The Landscape” - Promoter of the Public Space as “Message-Attitude” in the territory and “Engine-Product” for Urban Development. Urbanismul Serie Noua, 16-17, 158-160.

Crăciun, C., & Gârjoabă, A.-I. (2020). Strategic and Resilient Urban-Territorial Planning of the Integrated Landscape Related to the Natural and Anthropic Protected Areas. Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Philosophy & Humanistic Sciences, 8(1), 69-79.

Fathullah, A., & Willis, K. (2018). Engaging the Senses: The Potential of Emotional Data for Participation in Urban Planning. Urban Science, 2(98), 1-21.

Gârjoabă, A.-I., Crăciun, C., & Petrisor, A. I. (2020). Management of natural protected areas within the Romanian Cities. Case Study: Văcăreşti protected landscape and Natura 2000 Sites. The International Academic Forum (IAFOR), ACSEE2020, Tokyo, Japan.

Hao, J., Zhu, J., Zhong, R. (2015). The rise of big data on urban studies and planning practices in China: Review and open research issues. Journal of Urban Management, 4, 92-124.

Hasegawa, Y., Sekimoto, Y., Seto, T., Fukushima, Y., & Maeda, M. (2019). My City Forecast: Urban planning communication tool for citizen with national open data. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 77, 1-10.

Interreg Danube Transnational Programme. (2022). The Danube Transnational Programme - Programme presentation. Interreg Danube Transnational Programme.

Ivanov, N., & Gnevanov, M. (2018). Big data: perspectives of using in urban planning and management. MATEC Web of Conferences, 170. Matec.

Oliveira, A., Oliveira, G., & Lobo, H. (2020). Environmental Attitudes and Tourist Satisfaction in Overloaded Natural Protected Areas. Journal of Travel Research, 60(8), 1667–1676.

Planillo, A., Fiechter, L., Sturm, U., Voigt-Heucke, S., & Kramer-Schadt, S. (2021). Citizen science data for urban planning: Comparing different sampling schemes for modelling urban bird distribution. Landscape and Urban Planning, 211(6), 1-11.

Romanian Parliament - Chamber of Deputies. (2018). Dezvoltare urbană și arhitectură modernă în raport cu zonele verzi, parcurile municipale - Declarație politică prezentată în Plenul Camerei Deputaților din 18 martie 2018 [Urban development and modern architecture in relation to green areas, municipal parks - Political statement presented at the Plenary Session of the Chamber of Deputies on March 18, 2018]. Chamber of Deputies

Royds, D. (2018). The big data analysis challenge for landscape architecture. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 3, 191-199.

Sanchez, T. (2021). Innovations and Development in Urban Planning Scholarship and Research. Urban Planning, 6(1), 89-92.

Sorensen, J., Persson, A.S., & Olsson, J. A. (2021). A data management framework for strategic urban planning using blue-green infrastructure. Journal of Environmental Management, 299, 113658.

Tekouabou, S., Diop, E. B., Azmi, R., Jaligot, R., & Chenal, J. (2021). Reviewing the application of machine learning methods to model urban form indicators in planning decision support systems: Potential, issues and challenges. Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, 34(8B), 5943-5967.

Turkyilmaz, B., Kurucu, Y., Bolca, M., Altinbas, U., Esetlili, T., Gulgun, B., Ozen, F., Gencer, G., Guney, G., Hepcan, S., & Ozden, N. (2007). A GIS-based model for rating natural protection areas according to natural protection priorities. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 14(3), 278–286.

Yap, W., Janssen, P., & Biljecki, F. (2022). Free and open source urbanism: Software for urban planning practice. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 96, 101825.




How to Cite

Gârjoabă, A.-I., & Crăciun, C. (2022). Supporting the Process of Designing and Planning Heritage and Landscape by Spatializing Data on a Single Support Platform. Case Study: Romania. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 14(4), 54-68.



E-Learning and Software in Education

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now