The Publicity of Education: Challenges of Modern Communication Strategies

Authors

  • Lyudmila Vasylieva Аssociate professor National Aerospace University "Kharkiv Aviation Institute", Kharkiv, Ukraine
  • Olga Procenko Professor National Aerospace University  "Kharkiv Aviation Institute", Kharkiv, Ukraine
  • Svitlana Chmykhun Аssociate professor National Aerospace University “Kharkiv Aviation Institute", Kharkiv, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.2/427

Keywords:

publicity, technogenic society, information society, education, moral-communicative discourse, communicative competence

Abstract

The article investigates the publicity phenomenon in modern education as a moral-communicative discourse of a technogenic society. The study confirms that a person's identity falls under the manipulative influence and becomes the target of direct social and communicative coercion in the public environment. The educational environment includes a lot of public informatization. The article proves that educational media practices in public communications form certain public strategies such as the social organization of society, its socio-cultural norms, and values. The nature of these strategies is sometimes contrived, perfunctory and favorable for information confrontation, serves the only material interests and needs. The study proves that the concept of communicative competence of modern youth, which is constantly in a changing, information-saturated public environment, becomes especially important in the modern educational environment. It must have complex communication skills of social and public adaptation, techniques of effective interpersonal communication in which morality would not have a hidden nature, would not focus only on the physiologically-hidden nature of a person and would not invent surrogate identities. Such kind of publicity including the skills of communicative competence in the educational environment is the requirements of a modern technogenic civilization trying to survive. It is stated that in the present time when information and communication can act as effective activators of value-moral principles of educational culture. Such communication skills are necessary for the fast formation of sustainable principles of cross-cultural understanding that would support the values of tolerance and a healthy lifestyle. In such a case, the development of science and educational competences of all participants of the educational process should lead to periodic modification, improvement of the whole system of interpersonal communication, giving them new forms directed to the tolerance, in which the subject of communication finds himself in the "Other", or find "Other" in himself.

Author Biographies

Lyudmila Vasylieva, Аssociate professor National Aerospace University "Kharkiv Aviation Institute", Kharkiv, Ukraine

Аssociate professor National Aerospace University  "Kharkiv Aviation Institute", Kharkiv, Ukraine

Olga Procenko, Professor National Aerospace University  "Kharkiv Aviation Institute", Kharkiv, Ukraine

Professor National Aerospace University  "Kharkiv Aviation Institute", Kharkiv, Ukraine

Svitlana Chmykhun, Аssociate professor National Aerospace University “Kharkiv Aviation Institute", Kharkiv, Ukraine

Аssociate professor National Aerospace University “Kharkiv Aviation Institute", Kharkiv, Ukraine

References

Arendt, H. (2000). Vita Activia, ili o dejatel'noj zhizni [Vita activia, or about active life] [V. V. Bibikhina, Trans.]. Aletheia.

Aristotle. (1990). Politika [Politics]. Thought.

Baudrillard, J. (2006). Obshhestvo potreblenija. Ego mify i struktura [Consumer society. His myths and structure] [E. A. Samarskoy, Trans.]. Cultural Revolution.

Bauman, Z. (2008). Tekuchaja sovremennost' [Flowing modernity] [Y. V. Asochakova, Trans.]. Peter.

Bell, D. (1999). Grjadushhee postindustrial'noe obshhestvo. Opyt social'nogo prognozirovanija [The upcoming post-industrial society. Experience of social forecasting] [V. L. Inozemtseva, Trans.]. Academia.

Blumer, G. (2017). Simvolicheskii interaktcionizm [Symbolic interactionism] [A. Korbut, Trans.]. http://filosofy.vuzlib.net/book_o021_page_6.html

Bodrunova, S. (2011). Koncepcija publichnoj sfery i mediakraticheskaja teorija: poisk tochek soprikosnovenija [The concept of the public sphere and media theory: the search for common ground]. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 14(1), 110–132.

Castells, M. (2000). Informacionnaja jepoha: jekonomika, obshhestvo i kul'tura [Information age: Economics, society and culture]. HSE.

Dahl', V. (2006). Tolkovyi slovar zhivogo velikorusskogo iazyka [Explanatory dictionary of the living great Russian language ] (2nd vol.). AST.

Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. Basic Books.

Fromm, E. (2014). Imet' ili byt'? [To have or to be?] [E. M. Telyatnikova, Trans.]. AST.

Fukuyama, F. (2004). Konec istorii i poslednij chelovek [The end of the story and the last man] [M. B. Levin, Trans.]. ACT.

Gazniuk, L. (2003). Somatichne buttja personal'nogo svіtu osobistostі [Somatic being of the personal world of the personality]. CDAFC.

Giddens, E. (2003). Ustroenie obshhestva. Ocherk teorii strukturacii [Community building. Essay on the theory of structure] [I. Tyurina, Trans.] (2nd ed.). Academic Project.

Habermas, J. (2016). Strukturnaja transformacija publichnoj sfery [Structural transformation of the public sphere] [V. Ivanova, Trans.]. The Whole World.

Hegel, G. W. H. (2019). Vvedenie v istoriiu filosofii. Lektcii po estetike. Nauka logiki. Filosofiia prirody [Introduction to the history of philosophy. Lectures on aesthetics. Science of logic. Philosophy of nature]. Eksmo.

Husserl, E. (2010). Kartezianskie razmyshlenija [Cartesian Reflections] [V. I. Molchanova, Trans.]. Academic Project.

Jaspers, K. (1991). Smysl i naznachenie istorii [The meaning and purpose of history] [P. Gaidenko, Trans.]. Politizdat.

Kalashnikov, M. (2005). Tretiy proyekt [Tird project] (2nd vol.), Tochka perekhoda [Point of transition]. http://rulibs.com/ru_zar/sci_politics/kalashnikov/7/j120.html (Access date 30.04.2018).

Kant, I. (2018). K vechnomu miru. Sochinenija [To eternal peace. Works]. Ripol Classic.

Karasik, V. (2000). Obshhie problemy izuchenija diskursa. Jazykovaja lichnost': institucional'nyj personal'nyj diskurs [General problems of studying discourse. Language personality: institutional and personal discourse]. Change.

Kopilov, V. (2009). Vlada і znannja: Genezis іdeї epіstemokratії [Power and knowledge: The genesis of the ideological democracy]. KhAI.

Korets, M. & Chumachenko, D. (2020). The use information and communication technologies for the organization of documentation studies distance learning for bachelors of vocational education. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 78(4), 64–74.

Koroblyova, V. (2009). Pokolіnnja v polі kul'turi: mnozhinnіst' reprezentacії [Generations in the field of culture: plural representation]. KhNU.

Lazarsfeld, P. (1999). Massovaja kommunikacija, massovye vkusy i organizovannoe social'noe dejstvie. Massovaja kommunikacija v sovremennom mire: metodologija analiza i praktika issledovanij [Mass communication, mass tastes and organized social action. Mass communication in the modern world: analysis methodology and research practice]. Editorial URSS.

Lebon, G. (2018). Psikhologiia mass [Psychology of the masses]. Peter.

Lippman, W. (2004). Publichnaja filosofija [Public Philosophy] [I. Mürberg, Trans.]. Idea Press.

Locke, J. (1988). Mysli o vospitanii. Sochinenija [Thoughts on education. Works] (3rd ed.) [Y. M. Davidson, E. S. Lagutin, Y. V. Semenov & N. A. Fedorov, Trans.]. Thought.

Maksymenko, N., Bei, I., & Khimchuk, L. (2020). Formation of communicative culture of students by means of project teaching in higher educational establishments. Journal of History Culture Art Research, 3(3), 267-276. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i3.2719

Marcuse, G. (2003). Odnomernyj chelovek: Issledovanie ideologii razvitogo obshhestva [One-dimensional person: A study of the ideology of a developed society] [A. Yudina, Trans.]. AST.

Mounye, E. (1992). Personalizm [Personalism] Moscow : Iskusstvo, 1992. 143.

Musset, Alfred de (2010). La confession d'un enfant du Siocle [The confession of a child of Siocle]. Editions Flammarion.

Naumov, S. (2019). Publichnye kommunikacii kak fenomen netradicionnogo upravlenija. Filosofija upravlenija: problemy i strategii [Public communications as a phenomenon of non-traditional management. Management Philosophy: Problems and Strategies]. IFRAN.

Noel-Neuman, E. (1996). Obshhestvennoe mnenie. Otkrytie spirali molchanija [Public opinion. Opening the spiral of silence] [N. S. Mansurova, Trans.]. Progress Academy.

Odinokaya, M., Krepkaia, T., & Sheredekina, O. (2019). The culture of professional self-realization as a fundamental factor of students' internet communication in the modern educational environment of higher education. Education Sciences, 9(3), 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030187

Ovcharuk, O., & Soroko, N. (2016). Information and communication competency development in education system: Modern studies and prospects. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 51(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v51i1.1372

Pantiukova, R. (2009). Tip teksta kak komponentnaia sostavliaiushchaia vida i podvida diskursa. Lingvistika: traditcii i sovremennost [Type of text as a component of the type and subspecies of discourse. Linguistics: tradition and modernity] IPO PI SFU.

Pareto, W. (2011). Transformacija demokratii [Transformation of democracy] [M. Yusima, Trans.]. Territory of the Future.

Parsons, T. (2000). O strukture social'nogo dejstvija [On the structure of social action] [V. F. Chesnokova & S. A. Belanovsky, Trans.]. Academic Project.

Plato. (1993). Sobranie sochinenij [Collected works] (2nd vol.). Thought.

Prigogine, I. (1986). Porjadok iz haosa. Novyj dialog cheloveka s prirodoj [Order out of chaos. A new dialogue between man and nature] [Y. A. Danilova, Trans.]. Progress.

Protsenko, O. (2002). Etiket v prostorі praktichnoї fіlosofії [Etiquette in the vast practical philosophy]. KhNU.

Pulkki, J., Varpanen, J., & Mullen, J. (2020). Ecosocial philosophy of education: Ecologizing the opinionated self. Studies in Philosophy and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-020-09748-3

Puppel, P. (2014). Communication, power, education. Women in the cultural process of the early modern period. Zeitschrift fur Historische Forschung, 41(1), 141–143. ISSN: 0340-0174, WOS:000339688100010

Sennet, R. (2002). Padenie publichnogo cheloveka [The fall of a public person] [O. Isaeva, E. Rudnitskaya, V. Sofronov, K. Chukhrukidze, Trans.]. Logos.

Sorokin, P. (2003). Sistema sociologii [The system of sociology] [V. Lipsky & V. Sapov, Trans.]. Nauka.

Sosnowska, P. (2020) Instrumentalism: A worthwhile critical concept for philosophy of education? Policy Futures in Education, 18(7), 850–863. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1478210320960880

Veblen, T. (1984). Teorija prazdnogo klassa: Monografija [Idle class theory: Monograph] [S. D. Sorokina, Trans.]. Progress.

Voitovich, R. (2013). Metodologiia postroeniia silnogo gosudarstva: postsovetskii i evropeiskii opyt [Methodology for building a strong state: post-Soviet and European experience]. Bulletin of the National Academy of Public Administration under the President of Ukraine. Public “Administration series”, 3, 11–16. ISSN: 2310-2837, http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vnadu_2013_3_4

Waghid, Y. (2020). Philosophy of education in a new key: Cultivating a living philosophy of education to overcomecoloniality and violence in African universities. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1793714

Weber, M. (2016). Hozjajstvo i obshhestvo: ocherki ponimajushhej sociologii [Economy and society: essays in understanding sociology]. [L. G. Ionina, Trans.]. Higher School of Economics.

Weintraub, J. (1995). Varieties and vicissitudes of public space. Metropolis: Center and symbol of times. New York University Press.

Wolton, D. (1997). Penser la communication [Thinking about communication]. Flammarion.

Zajetz, D. (2014). Publіchnіst' jak socіokul'turnij fenomen [Publicity is a sociocultural phenomenon]. KhNU.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-13

How to Cite

Vasylieva, L., Procenko, O. ., & Chmykhun, S. . (2021). The Publicity of Education: Challenges of Modern Communication Strategies. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 13(2), 382-406. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.2/427

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now