Developing Technical Creativity in Future Engineering Educators

Authors

  • Leonid Byvalkevych T.H. Shevchenko National University «Chernihiv Colehium»
  • Olena Yefremova T.H. Shevchenko National University «Chernihiv Colehium»
  • Svitlana Hryshchenko T.H. Shevchenko National University «Chernihiv Colehium»

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/206

Keywords:

pedagogical conditions, problem approach, problem elements, search for creative solutions, creation of appropriate content, specialized course.

Abstract

The dynamics of scientific and technological progress incorporates new content into the goals and objectives of special education in training specialists as creative and thinking individuals. As a result, it leads to specific problems that must be solved immediately. There is a need to rethink theoretical and psychoeducational foundations and accumulated practical experience of higher education institutions. The research aims to prove theoretically and to verify the effectiveness of pedagogical conditions for developing technical creativity in future engineering educators experimentally. The pedagogical conditions for developing technical creativity in future engineering educators are as follows: creating appropriate content and nature of teachers’ activities; providing a creative environment for developing technical creativity. It must be noted that 261 students were involved in the experiment (a bachelor’s degree): the control group (CG) consists of 134 students and the experimental group (EG) – of 127 students. Relevant control tests and questionnaires were employed during the experimental stage, which allowed assessing the effectiveness of the proposed activities. According to the results of the calculations, the statistics of the criterion is Тobs. > Тcrit. (14.94>11.34). Thus, with a probability of 0.99, one can argue that the level of technical creativity in EG students differs from the level in CG. Indeed, the high level is 29.92% G and the average level in 53.54%. At the same time, the high and average levels of CG students are 16.42% and 47.76% respectively. The analysis of experimental work shows the expediency of the justified and verified pedagogical conditions for developing the technical creativity in future engineering educators.

References

Aleksyuk, A. M., Aiurzanain, A. A., & Pidkasystyi, P. I. (1993). Organizing students’ independent work under the conditions of intensification study. Ukraine, Kyiv: ISDO.

Andrianov, P., Halahuzova, M., & Katkova, L. (1990). Developing technical creativity in junior school pupils. Russia, Moscow: Education.

Babanskyi, Y. K. (1989). Selected pedagogical works. Russia, Moscow: Pedagogy. Bakhmat, N., Maksymchuk, B., Voloshyna, O., Kuzmenko, V., Matviichuk, T., Kovalchuk, A. … Maksymchuk, I. (2019). Designing cloud-oriented university environment in teacher training of future physical education teachers. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 19(4):1323–1332.

Bezliudnyi, O., Kravchenko, O., Maksymchuk, B., Mishchenko, M., & Maksymchuk, I. (2019). Psycho-correction of burnout syndrome in sports educators. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 19(3): 1585–1590.

Bychkov, A. V. (1990). Foundations of inventive culture. Russia, Moscow: Moscow worker.

Diachenko, V. K. (1989). The organizational structure of the educational process and its development. Russia, Moscow: Pedagogy.

Freud, S. (1990). Psychology of unconscious. Russia, Moscow: Education.

Gerasymova, I., Maksymchuk, B., Bilozerova, M., Chernetska, Yu., Matviichuk, T., Solovyov, V., & Maksymchuk, I. (2019). Forming professional mobility in future agricultural specialists: the sociohistorical context. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 11(4Sup1): 345-361. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/rrem/195

Goldin, I. I. (1979). Problem training in vocational and technical schools. Russia, Moscow: Higher Education.

Holovachova, O. (2008). Developing creative skills in pupils of technical training colleges of sewing profile in the course of studying “art modelling of clothes”. Master, 5: 94–96.

Ilyinskaya, I. A. (1985). Problem situations and ways of their creation during a lesson. Russia, Moscow: Knowledge.

Khymynets, V. V. (2009). Innovation educational activity. Ukraine, Ternopil: Mandrivets.

Koroteiev, S. G. (2000). Developing professional qualities of a technical creativity organizer in students from pedagogical universities. (PhD thesis). Armavir State Pedagogical Institute, Armavir.

Lerner, P. S. (1989). Training for prospective production. Russia, Moscow: High Education.

Luriya, A. R. (2006). Lectures on general psychology. Russia, Saint-Petersburg: Peter.

Maksymchuk, I., Maksymchuk, B., Frytsiuk, V., Matviichuk, T., Demchenko, I., Babii, I. … Savchuk, I. (2018). Developing pedagogical mastery of future physical education teachers in higher education institutions. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 18(2): 810–815. DOI:10.7752/jpes.2018.02119

Malinnikova, N. A. (2000). Future teacher training for the development of creative abilities at pupils in the course of training. (PhD thesis). I. G. Petrovsky Bryansk State Pedagogical University, Bryansk.

Matyushkin, O. M. (1993). Riddles endowments: problems of practical diagnostics. Russia, Moscow: School Press. May, R. (2001). Courage is to create. Russia, Moscow: Initiative.

Melnyk, N., Bidyuk, N., Kalenskyi, A., Maksymchuk. B., Bakhmat, N., Matviienko, O. … Maksymchuk, I. (2019). Models and organizational characteristics of preschool teachers’ professional training in some EU countries and Ukraine. Zbornik of the Institute for Pedagosti, 51(1):46–93.

Pavlov, I. P. (1951). Selected Works. Russia, Moscow: Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of RSFSR.

Sheremet, M., Leniv, Z., Loboda, V., & Maksymchuk, B. (2019). The development level of smart information criterion for specialists' readiness for inclusion implementation in education. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 72: 273–285.

Simonov, P. V. (1992). Brain and creativity. Issues of Philosophy, 1: 3–24.

Veretennikova, L. K. (1997). Future teacher training for the formation of creative potential at pupils. (PhD thesis). Udmurt State University, Kazan.

Vihotskyi, L. S. (1991). Imagination and creativity in childhood: a psychological essay. Russia, Moscow: Education.

Downloads

Published

2020-02-24

How to Cite

Byvalkevych, L., Yefremova, O., & Hryshchenko, S. (2020). Developing Technical Creativity in Future Engineering Educators. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(1), 162-175. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/206

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now