Synthetic Biology - Cultural and Anthropological Perspectives

Authors

  • Olivia Macovei PhD Student, Doctoral School of Ștefan cel Mare University from Suceava, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.3/486

Keywords:

synthetic biology, cultural perspective, anthropological perspective

Abstract

This article aims to make an analysis of the cultural and anthropological issues raised by synthetic biology. The novelty of the field makes it relatively difficult to compose a comprehensive analysis, even for philosophers with experience, but who are not familiar with the specifics of the field. The article will follow the synthesis of the models of ethical decision applicable in the field of ethical evaluation of technologies from a cultural and anthropological perspective, their critical analysis and will highlight the limitations of each model, as well as a possible synthesis of a model of ethical evaluation of technologies. Afterwords, it can be decided whether a particular technology - such as those involved in synthetic biology - poses risks to the environment, to those involved in research, to future generations (including humans, but not only), to humanity as a whole or to present or future ecosystems.

References

Central Intelligence Agency & Directorate of Intelligence. (2003). The Darker Bioweapons Future. https://irp.fas.org/cia/product/bw1103.pdf

Cullet, P. (2006). Liability and redress for modern biotechnology. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, nr. 15/2006, pp. 165–195. https://www.ielrc.org/content/a0601.pdf

Douglas, T., & Savulescu, J. (2010). Synthetic biology and the ethics of knowledge. Journal of medical ethics, 36(11), 687–693. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.038232

Eisenhaber, F., Thakar, J., Ponte-Sucre, A., & Dandekar, T. (2022). Editorial: Innovative Strategies From Synthetic Biology and Bacterial Pathways to Master Biochemical Environmental Challenges. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 9:828632. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.828632

Mackelprang, R., Aurand, E. R., Bovenberg, R.A. L., Brink, K. R., Charo, R. A., Delborne, J. A., Diggans, J., Ellington, A. D., Fortman, J. L., Isaacs, F. J., Medford, J. I., Murray, R. M., Noireaux, V., Palmer, M. J., Zoloth, L., Friedman, D. C. (2021). Guiding Ethical Principles in Engineering Biology Research. ACS Synthetic Biology, 10(5), 907–910. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.1c00129

Maurer, S. M., & Zoloth, L. (2007). Synthesizing Biosecurity. Bulletin of the Atomic Sciences, 63(6), 16-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2007.11461114

Nordlee, J. A., Taylor, S. L., Townsend, J. A., Thomas, L. A., & Bush, R. K. (1996). Identification of a Brazil-Nut Allergen in Transgenic Soybeans. The New England Journal of Medicine, 334, 688-692. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199603143341103

Pauwels, E. (2013). Public Understanding of Synthetic Biology. BioScience, 63(2), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2013.63.2.4

Preston, C. J. (2018). The Synthetic Age. Outdesigning Evolution, Resurrecting Species, and Reengineering Our World. MIT Press.

Sandu, A. (2020). Bioetica în criză sau criza bioeticii? O filosofie a pandemiei în societatea medicalizată. Lumen.

Sandu, A., Caras, A. (2013). (CHRISTIAN) Bioethical dilemmas using synthetic biology and nanotechnologies. Journal For The Study Of Religions And Ideologies, 12(35), 158-177. http://jsri.ro/ojs/index.php/jsri/article/view/708/591

Sandu, A. (2016). A Levinasian Opening on the Affirmative Ethics of Care. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 15(43), 28-47. http://jsri.ro/ojs/index.php/jsri/article/view/790

Sands, G., Atwood, K., Collinson, S., Bohn, K., & CNN. (2020). US government report assesses China intentionally concealed severity of coronavirus. https://edition.cnn.com/2020/05/03/politics/mike-pompeo-china-coronavirus-supplies/index.html

Saukshmya, T., & Chugh, A. (2010). Commercializing Synthetic Biology: Socio-ethical Concerns and Challenges Under Intellectual Property Regime. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 16, 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1057/jcb.2009.28

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Philosophy of Technology (2018). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/technology/

Terec-Vlad, L. (2016). The Principle of Responsibility towards the Human Non-Presence or the

Non-Human Presence. Postmodern Openings, 7(2), 79-89.

http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/po/2016.0702.06

Van Dooren, T. (2008). Inventing Seed: The Nature(s) of Intellectual Property in Plants. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(4), 676–697. https://doi.org/10.1068/dtvd

Van den Belt, H. (2013). Synthetic biology, patenting, health and global justice. Systems and synthetic biology, 7(3), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11693-012-9098-7

Venter, C. (2022). Synthetic Biology. J. Craig Venter Institute. https://www.jcvi.org/research/synthetic-biology

Wilson, E. (2003). The Future of Life. Vintage.

Wodak, J. (2020). (Human-Inflected) Evolution in an Age of (Human-Induced) Extinction: Synthetic Biology Meets the Anthropocene. Humanities, 9(49), 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/h9040126

Downloads

Published

2022-08-08

How to Cite

Macovei, O. (2022). Synthetic Biology - Cultural and Anthropological Perspectives. Postmodern Openings, 13(3), 216-233. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.3/486

Issue

Section

Theoretical articles