Attitude of Young People to the Criminality Problem in Ukrainian Postmodern Society
Keywords:police, youth, criminality, victimization
The research paper contains key findings of the random monitoring survey of the Ukrainian students covering the period 2002-2017, in the course of which it was explored the attitude of young people to the problems of crime and the police’s activities aimed at counteracting it in the city (Kyiv). The analysis of the survey findings allowed to identify the level of students’ fear to become victims of certain types of crime, a degree of their victimization in general and their fear to suffer from particular crimes, their assessments of the character of crime dynamics in the city and the police’s activities, to learn the opinions on the situation with personal security at a given time and in future. Among the trends identified in the course of the research are a high level of the respondents’ fear to become a victim of violent and most spread minor offences; high level of their victimization that distinctly decreased in recent years; prevailing negative assessments of the crime dynamics, assessment of the police’s activities and trust to it as unsatisfactory irrespective of the improvements in these indicators in the recent three years, prevailing negative assessment of the situation with personal security and positive expectations in relation to the changes in future.
Berthelot, R. E., McNeal, B. A., & Baldwin, J. M. (2018). Relationships between agency-specific contact, victimization type, and trust and confidence in the Police and courts. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 768-791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-018-9434-x
Birzu, B. (2017). Europol objectives and tasks in the construction of the European Union. Some critical opinions and proposals. Juridical Tribune, 7(1), 157-166.
Damme, A. V. (2017). The impact of police contact on trust and police legitimacy in Belgium. Policing and Society, 27(2), 205-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2015.1045510
Hashima, P. Y., & Finkelhor, D. (1999). Violent victimization of youth versus adults in the national crime victimization survey. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(8), 799-820. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626099014008002
Hoggett, J., Redford, P., Toher, D., & White, P. (2019). Challenges for police leadership: Identity, experience, legitimacy and direct entry. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 34, 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-018-9264-2
Kohlström, K., Rantatalo, O., Karp, S., & Padyab, M. (2017). Policy ideals for a reformed education: How police students value new and enduring content in a time of change. Journal of Workplace Learning, 29(7/8), 524-536. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-09-2016-0082
Kulyk, O. H. (2011). Zlochynnist v Ukraini: Tendentsii, zakonomirnosti, metody piznannia [Crime in Ukraine: Trends, patterns, methods of cognition]. Yurinkom Inter.
Langton, L., Planty, M., & Lynch, J. P. (2017). Second major redesign of the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). Criminology and Public Policy, 16(4), 1049-1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12335
Littleton, H., Layh, M., Rudolph, K., & Haney, L. (2019). Evaluation of the sexual experiences survey-revised as a screening measure for sexual assault victimization among college students. Psychology of Violence, 9(5), 555-563. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000191
Lorincz, A. L., & Măgureanu, A. F. (2017). The right of certain persons of not giving statements as witnesses in the Romanian Code of Criminal Procedure. Tribuna Juridică, 7(1), 198-206.
Mendel, J., Fyfe, N. R., & den Heyer, G. (2017). Does police size matter? A review of the evidence regarding restructuring police organizations. Police Practice and Research, 18(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2015.1135399
Morris, W., Norris, G., & Dowell, D. (2020). The business of farm crime: evaluating trust in the police and reporting of offences. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 22, 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41300-019-00083-5
Owens, J. G. (2017). Revealing victimization: The impact of methodological features in the National Crime Victimization Survey. Violence and Victims, 32(4), 688-713. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-16-00017
Royband, K. H. (2001). Ot isterii vokrug prestupnosti k normalnomu sostoyaniyu? [From hysteria around crime to normal]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 11, 77-83.
Săraru, C. S. (2016). Competence determined strictly by the law and the discretionary power of public administration. Tribuna Juridică, 6(2), 247-251.
Valieiev, R., Polyvaniuk, V., Antonenko, T., Rebkalo, M., Sobakar, A., & Oliinyk, V. (2019). The effects of gender, tenure and primary workplace on burnout of Ukrainian Police officers. Postmodern Openings, 10(4), 116-131. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/97
Valieiev, R., Tohochynskyi, O., Pekarchuk, V., Sobakar, A., & Iermakov, S. (2019). The job satisfaction of Ukrainian Police officers: Condition, structure and key predictors. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 11(1), 272-286. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/110
Van Dijk, J. (2015). The case for survey-based comparative measures of crime. European Journal of Criminology, 12(4), 437-456. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370815585446
Van Dijk, J., Van Kesteren, J., & Smit, P. (2007). Criminal victimisation in international perspective. Key findings from the 2004-2005 ICVS and EU ICS. Eleven International Publishing.
Vorona, V. M., & Shulha, M. O. (2016). Ukrainske suspilstvo: Monitorynh sotsialnykh zmin [Ukrainian society: Monitoring social changes]. Instytut sotsiolohii NAN Ukrainy.
Xie, M., & Baumer, E. P. (2019). Neighborhood immigrant concentration and violent crime reporting to the police: A multilevel analysis of data from the National Crime Victimization Survey. Criminology, 57(2), 237-267. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12204
Yesberg, J. A., & Bradford, B. (2019). Affect and trust as predictors of public support for armed police: evidence from London. Policing and Society, 29(9), 1058-1076. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2018.1488847
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs