Reflection of the Specifics of the Supervision Process in the Environment of Social and Legal Protection of Children

Authors

  • Bohuslav Kuzyšin PhDr., PhD., Department of Christian Anthropology and Social Work, Faculty of Orthodox Theology of Prešov University in Prešov, Masarykova 15, 080 01 Prešov, the Slovak Republic
  • Milan Schavel St. Elisabeth College of Health and Social Work in Bratislava
  • Jaroslava Pavelková Doc. RNDr., CSc., Department of Health Care Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Štefánikova 5670, 760 01 Zlín, the Czech Republic; St. Elisabeth College of Health and Social Work in Bratislava, Nám. 1. mája, P. O. Box 104, 810 00 Bratislava, det. Institute of St. Jan Nepomuk Neumann, Jiráskovy sady 240, 261 01 Příbram 1, the Czech Republic;

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.1sup1/126

Keywords:

Supervision, social work, social protection, current state, efficiency, helping professionals.

Abstract

The article presents a selected part of the research that was carried out in 2019 in Slovakia the aim of which was to assess feedback on the perception of the supervisory process in social protection entities as offered by the supervisor. The basic set consisted of supervisors in helping professions operating under Act No. 305/2005 Coll. They are specialists with a second degree education in the humanities or social sciences who have completed an accredited supervision course in the minimum range of 240 hours and have appropriate practice. 10.68 % of Slovak supervisors participated in the research. A probing research was used, which carried elements of quantitative strategies, but has not been moved to the area of verification, comparative or correlation investigation. The secondary benefit of this study is the depiction of the structure of supervisors in Slovakia and its longitudinal development. The primary method of collecting empirical data was a questionnaire created by the authors. More than 90.0 per cent of respondents stated a positive perception of the supervision provided by Social and Legal Protection (hereinafter SLP) employees. Among the dominant themes of supervision in the SLP were clearly “relational areas”, reflection of workflow including case supervision and burnout. Our findings confirmed that active listening and its essence concentrates on an interview from a methodological point of view. According to our findings and assuming a reasonable degree of generalization, it can be stated that the supervision is primarily performed according to the established standards and codes of ethics.

References

Bährer-Kohler, S. (2013). Burnout for experts: Prevention in the context of living and working. Springer.

Balint, M. (1979). The basic fault: Therapeutic aspects of regression. Tavistock Publications.

Beddoe, L. (2011). External supervision in social work: Power, space, risk, and the search for safety. Australian Social Work, 65(2), 197 - 213. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407x.2011.591187

Bérešová, A. (2018). Syndróm vyhorenia sociálnych pracovníkov – Teória a empirické zistenia [Explosion syndrome in social workers - Theory and empirical findings]. In M. Schavel, B. Kuzyšin, &. S. Hynyadiova (Eds.), Podoby supervízie a prevencia syndrómu vyhorenia [Forms of supervision and prevention of burnout] (pp. 41-50). St. Elisabeth College of Health and Social Work.

Gabura, J. (2018). Tímová supervízia [Team supervision]. In M. Schavel, B. Kuzyšin, &. S. Hynyadiova (Eds.), Podoby supervízie a prevencia syndrómu vyhorenia [Forms of supervision and prevention of burnout] (pp. 63-72). St. Elisabeth College of Health and Social Work.

Gavora, P. (2001). Úvod do pedagogického výzkumu [Introduction to pedagogical research]. Iris.

Gavora, P., Koldeová, L., Dvorská, D., Pekárová, J., & Moravčík, M. (2010). Elektronická učebnica pedagogického výskumu [Electronic textbook of educational research]. Comenius University.

Hanzel, I. (2009). Kvalitatívne, alebo kvantitatívne metódy v sociálnych vedách [Qualitative or quantitative methods in social sciences]. Filozofia, 64(7), 646 -657.

Havrdová, Z., & Hajný, M. (Coords.). (2008). Praktická supervize: Průvodce supervizí pro začínající supervizory, manažery a příjemce supervize [Practical supervision: A supervision guide for beginning supervisors, managers and supervised]. Galén.

Hunyadiová, S. (2018). Techniky v supervízii pri syndróme vyhorenia zamestnancov v zariadeniach sociálnych služieb [Supervision techniques for the socrates of the employees of social services]. In M. Schavel, B. Kuzyšin, &. S. Hynyadiova , S. (Eds.), Podoby supervízie a prevencia syndrómu vyhorenia [Forms of supervision and prevention of burnout] (pp. 28-40). St. Elisabeth College of Health and Social Work.

Kadushin, A. (1992). Supervision in social work. Columbia University Press. Kadushin, A., & Harkness, D. (2014). Supervision in social work (5th ed.). Columbia University Press.

Kuzyšin, B. (2018). Vplyv supervízie na predchádzanie alebo zmierňovanie syndrómu vyhorenia u odborných zamestnancov zariadení sociálnych služieb [Impact of supervision on prevention or alleviation of burnout syndrome in professional employees of social service facilities]. In M. Schavel, B. Kuzyšin, &. S. Hynyadiova , S. (Eds.), Podoby supervízie a prevencia syndrómu vyhorenia [Forms of supervision and prevention of burnout] (pp. 20-27). St. Elisabeth College of Health and Social Work.

Kuzyšin, B., & Schavel, M. (2014). The structure of the social work supervisors in Slovakia. Clinical Social Work: International Scientific Group of Applied Preventive Medicine I, 5(1), 17-21.

Mátel, A. (2018). Etický kódex supervízie - Analýza v kontexte medzinárodných etických princípov supervízie [Ethical Code of the Supervision. Analysis in the context of international ethical principles of supervision]. In M. Schavel, B. Kuzyšin, &. S. Hynyadiova , S. (Eds.), Podoby supervízie a prevencia syndrómu vyhorenia [Forms of supervision and prevention of burnout] (pp. 51-62). St. Elisabeth College of Health and Social Work.

Morrison, T. (2003). Staff supervision in social care. Ashford Press.

Muntean, A. (2007). Supervizare. Aspecte practice şi tendinţe actuale [Supervision. Practical aspects and current trends]. Polirom.

National Council of the Slovak Republic. (2005). Act No. 305/2005 Coll. on social and legal protection of children and social guardianship and on amendments and supplements to certain acts, as amended.

Nová, M. (2016). Migration - Models and principles of immigrant integration. In E. Kovářová, L. Melecký & Staníčková, M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on European Integration (pp. 673-678). VŠB - Technical University of Ostrava.

Ondrejkovič, P. (2005). Úvod do metodológie sociálnych vied: Základy metodológie kvantitatívneho výskumu [Introduction to the methodology of social sciences: fundamentals of quantitative research methodology]. Regent.

Ponea, S., & Sandu, A. (2011). Grupul de socializare apreciativ. Un model de creativitate socială colaborativă [Appreciative socialization group. A collaborative model of social creativity]. Lumen.

Pružinský, Š. (2019). General letter of Saint Apostle James. Exegesis of 3rd chapter. University of Bialystok.

Richmond, M. E. (1922). What is social case work? An introductory description. Russell Sage Foundation.

Ritomský, A. (2004). Metodológia sociálnopsychlogického výskumu [Methodology of social psychological research]. In T. Kollárik (Ed.), Social psychology (pp. 53-72). Comenius University.

Růžička, J. (1995). Psychoterapie [Psychotherapy]. Triton. Sandu, A. (2016). Social construction of reality as communicative action. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Sandu, A., & Unguru, E. (2017). Several conceptual clarifications on the distinction between constructivism and social constructivism. Postmodern Openings, 8(2), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/2017.0802.04

Schavel, M. (2018). Význam supervízie na predchádzanie syndrómu vyhorenia v zariadeniach sociálnych služieb z pohľadu supervízorov [The importance of supervision for prevention of burnout in social services facilities from the perspective of supervisors]. In M. Schavel, B. Kuzyšin, & S. Hunyadiova (Eds.), Podoby supervízie a prevencia syndrómu vyhorenia [Forms of supervision and prevention of burnout] (pp. 6-19). St. Elisabeth College of Health and Social Work.

Schavel, M., Kuzyšin, B., Berešová, A., & Hunyadiová, S. (2018). The impact of supervision in social work on the burnout syndrome prevention. Social Space Scientific Journal, 2(16), 81-100.

Scherpner, M. (1999). Principles of agogical action. German Association for Private and Public Care.

Šip, M. (2017). Mental health care services. Social and Spiritual Review, 2(8), 29-35.

Škodová, Z. (2013). Praktický úvod do metodológie výskumnej práce [Practical introduction to the methodology of research work]. Comenius University in Bratislava, Jessenius Faculty Medicine in

Martin.

Towle, C. (1957). Some reflections on social work education. Family Welfare Association.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-18

How to Cite

Kuzyšin, B., Schavel, M., & Pavelková, J. (2020). Reflection of the Specifics of the Supervision Process in the Environment of Social and Legal Protection of Children. Postmodern Openings, 11(1Sup1), 116-130. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.1sup1/126

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now