The Role of Ethical Factors in Organizational Communication
Keywords:organizational communication, ethics, ethical counselling, philosophical counseling
AbstractThere is a growing need for ethical counseling on behalf of all organizations. Thus, various practices that are typical for philosophical counseling are also becoming, to a greater extent, a part of the development of organizations. Especially the growing complexity of organizational communication within the context of digital era results in the increase of the number and difficulty of the ethical dilemmas that arise in the area of both internal and external communication of organizations. Here one can witness a series of interventions of organizational ethical counseling. The major impact of the “digital turn” in the field of organizational communication generates more complex and challenging situations that need to be addressed in innovative ways. While the major importance of ethical reflection in organizational communication has become a generally accepted fact, the paper underscores the potential held by the ethical and philosophical counseling in organizational communication. Given their efficiency to value personal resources in ensuring an ethical climate, to balance the internal and external dimensions in the plan of the organizational communication and especially to create a vision of the organization, ethical counseling is similar in importance to what we identify as a personal vision of the world assumed at a personal level.
Arnett, R. C. (2012). Dialogic ethics: Meeting differing grounds of the good. In R. C. Arnett, J. M. Harden Fritz & L. M. Bell (Eds.). Communication ethics literacy: Dialogue and difference (pp. 79-98). London, UK: SAGE Publications.
Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, USA: University of Texas Press. Bohm, D. (2003). On dialogue. New York, USA: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). Economia bunurilor simbolice [The economy of symbolic goods], (M. D. Gheorghiu, Trans.). Bucharest, Romania: Meridiane.
Brown, M. T. (2005). Corporate integrity: Rethinking organizational ethics and leadership. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Buber, M. (1992). Eu şi tu [Me and you]. Bucharest, Romania: Humanitas.
Corbu, N. (2009). Brandurile globale. O cercetare cross-culturală [Global brands. A crosscultural research]. Bucharest, Romania: Tritonic.
Cotton, M. (2014). Ethics and technology assessment: A participatory approach. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
Deckers, E., & Lacy, K. (2010). Branding yourself. How to use social media to invent or reinvent yourself. Indianapolis, USA: Que.
Foucault, M. (2004). Hermeneutica subiectului. Cursuri la Collège de France (1981-1982) [Hermeneutics of the subject. Courses at the Collège de France (1981-1982)] (B. Ghiu, Trans.). Ias I, Romania: Polirom.
Frunză, M. (2008). Tematizări în eticile applicate. Perspective feministe [Thematizations in applied ethics. Feminist perspectives]. Cluj-Napoca, Romania: Limes.
Frunză, S. (2019a). Philosophical counseling and communication. Cluj-Napoca, Romania: Presa Universitară Clujeană.
Frunză, S. (2019b). Storytelling in the organizational brand development and personal brand construction in the perspective of symbolic conscience. European Journal of Science and Theology, 15(6), 129-143.
Gergen, K. J., Gergen, M. M., & Barrett, F. J. (2004). Dialogue: Life and death of the organization. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, N. Phillips & L Putnam. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 39-61). Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage.
Grad, I. (2017). The symbolic dimension of responsibility in organizational communication. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 16(48), 112-124.
Hancock, P. A. (2009). Mind, machine and morality. Toward a philosophy of humantechnology symbiosis. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press.
Hansson, S. O. (Ed.). (2017). The ethics of technology: Methods and approaches. Lanham, USA: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Hațegan, V. P. (2018). Involving philosophical practice in solving life situations. The action of 4C theory. Postmodern Openings, 9(3), 20-35. doi:10.18662/po/34
Van den Hoven, J., & Weckert, J. (Eds.). (2008). Information technology and moral philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Koestenbaum, P. (2003). The philosophic consultant. Revolutionizing organizations with ideas. San Francisco, USA: Josey-Bass.
Koslowski, P. (Ed.). (2010). Elements of a philosophy of management and organization. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
Lucaci, F. (2018). Logical thinking and spiritual projections in Ioan Biris’s philosophy. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 17(50), 125-139.
Marinoff, L. (2002). Philosophical practice. New York, USA: Academic Press.
Morariu, I. M. (2019). Philosophical counselling and personal development in the contemporary world. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 18(53), 171- 175.
Morgan, G. (2006). Images of organization. New York, USA: Sage.
Muhr, S. L., Bent, M. S., & Steen, V. (Eds). (2010). Ethics and organizational practice. Questioning the moral foundations of management. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Nickel, J. W. (1988). Philosophy and policy. In D. M. Rosenthal & F. Shedadi (Eds). Applied ethics and ethical theory (pp. 139-148). Salt Lake City, USA: University of Utah Press.
Peters, J. D. (2000). Speaking into the air: A history of the idea of communication. Chicago, USA: The University of Chicago Press.
Preda, A. (2019). How faith-based marketing can forestall the crisis of institutionalized religion. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 18(52), 125-141.
Rein, I., Kotler, P., Hamlin, M., & Stoller, M. (2006). High visibility. Transforming your personal and professional brand (3rd ed.). New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.
Ruah-Midbar Shapiro, M. (2018). Abracadabra! Postmodern therapeutic methods: Language as a neo-magical tool. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 17(49), 3-17.
Sandu, A. (2019a). Preliminarii la un model socio-semiotic al act iunii comunicative [Preliminaries to a socio-semiotic model of communicative action]. In A. Sandu (Coord.) Consilierea filosofica apreciativa [Appreciative philosophical counselling] (pp. 129-149). Ias I, Romania: Lumen.
Sandu, A. (2019b). Philosophical counselling as a ground for philosophizing. Reflections based on the volume: Communication and philosophical counselling, author Sandu Frunza , Eikon Publishing House, Bucharest, 2019. Postmodern Openings, 10(1), 296-302. doi:10.18662/po/68
Scherer, A. G., Does, E., & Marti, E. (2016). Epistemology. In M. Raza, H. Willmott, & M. Greenwood (Eds.) The Routledge companion to philosophy in organization studies (pp. 33-50). Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis.
Taylor, J. R. (2005). Engaging organization through worldview. In S. May & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), Engaging organizational communication theory and research: Multiple perspectives (pp. 197-222). London, UK: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452204536.n9
Thyssen, O. (2009). Business ethics and organizational values: A systems theoretical analysis. New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (Eds.). (2011). Philosophy and organization theory. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Wittgenstein, L. (2012). Tractatus logico-philosophicus (2nd ed.) (M. Dumitru & M. Flonta, Trans.). Bucharest, Romania: Humanitas.
Wolff, J. (2011). Ethics and public policy: A philosophical inquiry. New York, USA: Routledge.
Wray-Bliss, E. (2016). Ethical philosophy, organization studies and good suspicions. In M. Raza, H. Willmott, & M. Greenwood (Eds.) The Routledge companion to philosophy in organization studies (pp. 51-65). Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs