Silence of the Idols: Appropriating the Myth of Sisyphus for Posthumanist Discourses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/47Keywords:
Prometheus, posthumanism, transhumanism, Sisyphus, Daedalus, mythsAbstract
Both current and past analyses and critiques of transhumanist and posthumanist theories have had a propensity to cite the Greek myth of Prometheus as a paradigmatic figure. Although stark differences exist amongst the token forms of posthumanist theories and transhumanism, both theoretical domains claim promethean theory as their own. There are numerous definitions of those two concepts: therefore, this article focuses on posthumanism thought. By first analyzing the appropriation of the myth in posthumanism, we show how the myth fails to be foundational and how we need to rethink the posthumanist mythological framework. We then introduce Haldane‟s Daedalus figure as a fruitful analogy to understand the demiurgic posture that critics mean to unveil by first using Prometheus. Daedalus embodies the artisan role, whose status as an inventor for the mighty preserves from the gods' direct opprobrium. Thereafter, we introduce the Camusian Myth of Sisyphus as a competing analogy that ultimately serves as a myth better suited to address the posthumanist position on an existential standpoint. we ultimately show that Sisyphus, as the „absurd man‟ that Camus claims him to be, is himself the posthuman, thus serving as a more ideal foundational myth for posthumanism and preserving the importance of narrative in posthuman discourses. To conclude, we specifically show that the concept of Sisyphus as a posthuman icon has significance that reaches beyond narrative value to current ecological debates in posthumanism.References
Apollodorus. (1921). The library. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0548.tl g001.perseus-eng1:1.9
Anders, G. (1956). Die antiquiertheit des menschen [The antiquity of man]. Munich, Germany: C.H. Beck.
Atlan, H. (2005). L’utérus artificiel [The artificial uterus]. Paris, France: Seuil. Retrieved from http://www.seuil.com/ouvrage/l-uterus-artificiel-henriatlan/9782020799782
Besnier, J.-M. (2016). Le transhumanisme est une machine de guerre contre la vie [Transhumanism is a machine of war against life]. UP Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.up-magazine.info/index.php/hommeaugmente/homme-augmente/6182-le-transhumanisme-machine-de-guerrecontre-la-vie
Bostrom, N. (2005). A history of transhumanist thought. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 14(1), 1–25. Retrieved from https://nickbostrom.com/papers/history.pdf
Camus, A. (1942). The myth of sisyphus. New York, USA: Penguin Random House.
Chifflet, S. (2009). L‟imaginaire technoscientifique récit, mythe, image [The technoscientific imaginary story, myth, image]. Raison Présente, (171), 63–74.
Collard, M. (2002). Sisyphe : Histoire d’une liberté. La version grecque du châtiment comme illustration de la pensée camusienne [Sisyphus: History of a freedom. The Greek version of retribution as an illustration of Camusian thought]. l‟Université de Louvain. Retrieved from http://bcs.fltr.ucl.ac.be/fe/03/Sisyphe.html
Decker, D. B. (2010). The liberation of humanism of Albert Camus. California, USA: California State University. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/openview/73d9c16e2c826c209947ad49cf42a 88c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Drexler, K. E. (2006). Engines of creation 2.0. The coming era of nanotechnology. New York, USA: Anchor Books - Doubleday. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/cortiz/www/3.052/3.052CourseReader/3_Enginesof Creation.pdf
Dreyfus, H. L. (1991). Being-in-the-world: A commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
Ferrando, F. (2013). Posthumanism, transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism, and new materialisms: Differences and relations. Existenz, 8(2), 26–32. Retrieved from https://existenz.us/volumes/Vol.8- 2Ferrando.pdf
Franssen, T. (2014). Prometheus: Performer or transformer? In R. Ranisch & S. L. Sorgner (Eds.), Post- and transhumanism: An introduction. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
Fuller, S. (2013). Preparing for life in humanity 2.0. Architectural review. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137277077
Hadot, P. (2004). Le voile d’Isis. Essai sur l’histoire de l’idée de nature [The veil of Isis. Essay on the history of the idea of nature]. Paris, France: Gallimard.
Haldane, J. B. S. (1923). Deadalus of science and the future. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Harman, G. (2002). Tool-being: Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects. Chicago, USA: Open Court Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.opencourtbooks.com/books_n/tool_being.htm
Harman, G. (2016). Immaterialism: Objects and social theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity. Retrieved from http://ca.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd1509500960.html
Hassan, I. (1977). Prometheus as performer: Toward a posthumanist culture? The Georgia Review, 31(4), 830–850. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41397536
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. New York, USA: Harper Collins.
Herbrechter, S. (2013). Posthumanism : A critical analysis. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing. Retrieved from https://books.google.ca/booksid=ddnUAAAAQBAJ&dq=posthumanis m+prometheus&source=gbs_navlinks_s
Hesiod. (1959). The works and days. Theogony. The shield of Herakles. Ann Arbor, USA: University of Michigan Press.
Homer. (1900). The Odyssey. London, UK: Perseus Digital Library. Retrieved from http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A199 9.01.0218%3Abook%3D11%3Acard%3D13
Hottois, G., & Goffi, J.-Y. (2017). Philosophie et idéologies trans-posthumanistes [Transposthumanist philosophy and ideologies]. Paris, France: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.
Jones, G., & Whitaker, M. (2012). Transforming the human body. In C. Blake, C. Molloy & S. Shakespeare (Eds.), Beyond human: From animality to transhumanism (pp. 254–279). New York, USA: Bloomsbury Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/beyond-human9781441150110/
Kurzweil, R. (2006). Transcript for Ray Kurzweil on Transcending Biology. To the best of our knowledge. Retrieved from http://www.ttbook.org/book/transcript/transcript-ray-kurzweiltranscending-biology.%0D
Law, J., & Mol, A. (1995). Notes on materiality and sociality. The Sociological Review, 43(2), 274–294. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1995.tb00604.x
Leroy-Gourhan, A. (1965). Le Geste et la Parole II. La mémoire et les rythmes [Gesture and the The Speech II. Memory and rhythms] (vol. 2). Paris, France: Albin Michel.
Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple : Ontology in medical practice. Durham, USA: Duke University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ca/books?id=qdltz8N9qSEC&dq=the+body+multi ple&source=gbs_navlinks_s
Morton, T. (2007). Ecology without nature: Rethinking environmental aesthetics. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674034853
Morton, T. (2012). The ccological thought. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674064225
Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. Minneapolis, USA: University of Minnesota Press. Retrieved from https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/books/hyperobjects
Morton, T. (2016). Dark ecology: For a logic of future coexistence. New York, USA: Columbia University Press.
Müller, K. (1841). Pherecydis fragmenta. In Fragmenta historicorum graecorum . Parisiis Editore Ambrosio Firmin Didot. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/fragmentahistori04mueluoft
Pausanias. (1918). Description of Greece. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Paus. 2.5.1&lang=original
Plato. (1997). Protagoras. In J. M. Cooper & D. S. Hutchinson (Eds.), Plato: Complete works. Indianapolis, USA: Hackett Pub Co Inc.
Roco, M. C., Bainbridge, W. S., Tonn, B., & Whitesides, G. (2013). Overview and recommendations. In M. C. Roco, W. S. Bainbridge, B. Tonn & G. Whitesides (Eds.), Convergence of knowledge, technology and society: Beyond convergence of nano-bio-info-cognitive technologies (pp. 7–32). New York, USA: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02204-8
Sandel, M. J. (2009). The case against perfection. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674036383
Shakespeare, S. (2012). Articulating the inhuman: God, animal, machine. In C. Blake, C. Molloy & S. Shakespeare (Eds.), Beyond human: From animality to transhumanism (pp. 227–253). New York, USA: Bloomsbury Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/beyond-human9781441150110/
Sorgner, S. L. (2014). Pedegrees. In R. Ranisch & S. L. Sorgner (Eds.), Post- and transhumanism: An introduction (pp. 29–48). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang. doi:10.15496/publikation-738
Stock, G. (2002). Redesigning humans : Our inevitable genetic future. Boston, USA: Houghton Mifflin. Retrieved from https://books.google.ca/books/about/Redesigning_Humans.html?id=Y2f TqbOTHEcC
Theognis. (1931). Elegy and Iambus. (vol. I) The elegiac poems of Theognis. Retrieved from http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2008.01.0479%3Avolume%3D1%3Atext%3D11%3Asection%3D2#note174
Von Hassel, M. E. (2017). The rebel hero: Albert Camus and the Search for Meaning Amidst the Absurd. Inquiries, 9(6). Retrieved from http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1609/the-rebel-hero-albertcamus-and-the-search-for-meaning-amidst-the-absurd
Wadlow, R. (2013). Albert Camus at 100: Stoic humanist and world citizen. Retrieved from https://towardfreedom.com/archives/europe/albertcamus-at-100-stoic-humanist-and-world-citizen/
Welsch, W. (2017). Postmodernism – Posthumanism – Evolutionary anthropology. Journal of Posthuman Studies, 1(1), 75–86. doi:10.5325/jpoststud.1.1.0075
Wheeler, M. (2011). Being-in-the-world in Martin Heidegger. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/heidegger/#BeiWor
Wolfe, C. (2009). What is posthumanism? Minneapolis, USA: University of Minnesota Press. Retrieved from https://www.upress.umn.edu/bookdivision/books/what-is-posthumanism
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND