Intensionality, Reference and Games of Partial Information I. Intensional Transitive Verbs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/38Keywords:
Existential entailment, substitution salva veritate, interpretation de dicto, Nash equilibrium, Pareto efficiency, intensionality,Abstract
In this paper I focus on the linguistic constructions in which intensional transitive verbs (ITVs) occur. In order to present the complex semantic profile of the ITVs, I contrast them with the extensional transitive verbs and I inspect the semantic differences of their inferential behaviour with respect to the existential entailment, to the substitution salva veritate of the coreferential terms and to the semantic specificity. Insofar as the sentences containing ITVs are structurally ambiguous between an intensional, de dicto interpretation, and an extensional, de re interpretation, they threaten the coordination between agents. For this reason, if the speaker uses an ITV in one way and the hearer’s reading of it diverges from the speaker’s intended meaning, both agents have a coordination problem. In this regard, using the mathematical framework of games of partial information, I show what conditions have to be satisfied in order for a rational speaker and a rational hearer to efficiently communicate with a sentence in which an ITV occurs and to converge on the right interpretation of the intensional verb construction, when the sentence’s surface syntax is probabilistically silent about which of the de re or de dicto meaning the hearer has to choose in order to coordinate with the speaker. This is the first part of a two-part study.References
Abbott, B. (2010). Reference. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Abbott, B. (2011). Reference: foundational issues. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger & P. Portner (Eds.). Semantics. An international handbook of natural language meaning (pp. 49-74), vol. 1. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.
Clark, R. (2012). Meaningful games. Exploring language with game theory. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
D’Ambrosio, J. (2017). Semantic verbs are intensional transitives. Mind (2017, December 21). doi:10.1093/mind/fzx029. Retrieved from http://justindambrosio.wixsite.com/philosophy/research
Forbes, G. (2006). Attitude problems: An essay on linguistic intensionality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Forbes, G. (2013). Intensional transitive verbs. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, USA: Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/intensional-transverbs
Kaplan, D. (1968). Quantifying in. Synthese, 19(1/2), 178-214. doi:10.1007/bf00568057
Moltmann, F. (1997). Intensional verbs and quantifiers. Natural Language Semantics, 5(1), 1-52. doi:10.1023/a:1008245409172
Moltmann F. (2008). Intensional verbs and their intentional objects. Natural Language Semantics, 16(3): 239-270. doi:10.1007/s11050-008-9031-5
Parikh, P. (1991). Communication and strategic inference. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14(5), 473-514. doi:10.1007/bf00632595
Parikh, P. (2000). Communication, meaning, and interpretation. Linguistics and Philosophy, 23(2), 185-212. doi:10.1023/a:1005513919392
Parikh, P. (2001). The use of language. Stanford, USA: CSLI Publications.
Parikh, P. (2007). Situations, rules, and conventional meaning: Some uses of games of partial information. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(5), 917-933. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.01.004
Parikh, P. (2010). Language and equilibrium. Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.
Quine, W. V. (1956). Quantifiers and propositional attitudes. The Journal of Philosophy, 53(5), 177-187. doi:10.2307/2022451
Recanati, F. (2000). Oratio obliqua, oratio recta: An essay on metarepresentation. Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.
Ross, I. (2011). Say what? A game-theoretic approach to the said/implicated distinction. In K. Turner (Ed.), Making semantics pragmatic (pp. 205-226). Bradford, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Schwarz, F. (2015). Intensional transitive verbs: I owe you a horse. To appear in: L. Matthewson, C. Meier, H. Rullman & T. E. Zimmermann (Eds.), Companion to semantics. Retrieved from http://www.florianschwarz.net/
Van Rooy, R. (2004). Signalling games select Horn strategies. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27(4), 493-527. doi:10.1023/b:ling.0000024403.88733.3f
Watson, J. (2013). Strategy: An introduction to game theory. (3rd ed.). New York, USA: W. W. Norton & Company
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND