Remedies and Sanctions for Non-Compliance with the Aspects Aiming at the Authorization and Development of Supervision and Research Special Methods

Authors

  • Denisa Barbu Lecturer PhD Valahia University of Targoviste Department of Public Administration

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenlaw/8.2/41

Keywords:

criminal evidence, sanctions for non-compliance, criminal sanctions, criminal procedure

Abstract

The distinction between the notion of sanction and that of remedy is very important from the perspective of the present analysis, as the idea of sanction implies, in addition to bringing the whole criminal process within lex limits and the idea of punitive, sanctioning the individual’s conduct, the last being the basis of the institution, while the notion of remedy pursues and at the same time places in the main plan the idea of safeguarding the entire procedure by trying to keep the procedural and processual activities within reasonable limits. From the perspective of the analysis of the existence and the need to implement the legislation, we can easily conclude in the regard that these methods, techniques are intrusive. Thus, in order to be able to determine the concrete content of the intrusion, we must appeal to the principles of criminal processual law.

The latter principles benefit both from a framework regulation in the Fundamental Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, but also from an internal regulation in the Code of Criminal Procedure, as amended by Law no. 255/2013 for the implementation of Law 135/2010 on the Code of Criminal Procedure and for amending and supplementing some normative acts that include criminal procedural provisions.

References

Boţic, S. (2016). Regula exclusiunii. Excluderea probelor obţinute nelegal în procesul penal [Exclusion rule. Exclusion of illegally obtained evidence in criminal proceedings]. Universul Juridic.

Bulea, E. A. (2017a). Cercetarea la faţa locului în cazul accidentelor de muncă urmate de moartea victimei [On-site investigation in case of work accidents followed by the death of the victim]. Lumen.

Bulea, E. A. (2017b). Acte de urmarire penală efectuate în investigarea accidentelor de muncă urmate de moartea victimei [Criminal investigation procedures carried out in the investigation of work accidents followed by the death of the victim]. Lumen.

Ciucă, A. (2019). Vespasian V. Pella şi idealul păcii prin drept [Vespasian V. Pella and the ideal of peace through law]. Lumen.

Constitutional Court of Romania. (2018). Decizia nr. 22/2018 referitoare la excepţia de neconstituţionalitate a dispoziţiilor art. 102 alin. (3), art. 345 alin. (3) şi art. 346 alin. (4) din Codul de procedură penală [Decision no. 22/2018 regarding the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. 102 para. (3), art. 345 para. (3) and art. 346 para. (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure]. Monitorul Oficial al României, 177, 2018, February 26.

Mateuț, G. (2019). Procedură penală. Partea generală [Criminal procedure. The general part]. Universul Juridic.

Romanian Parliament. (2010). Legea nr. 135/2010 privind Codul de Procedură Penală (NCCP) [Law no. 135/2010 on the Code of Criminal Procedure]. Monitorul Oficial al României, 486, 2010, July 15.

Udroiu, M. (2017). Procedură penală. Partea generală [Criminal procedure. The general part]. CH Beck.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-12

How to Cite

Barbu, D. (2020). Remedies and Sanctions for Non-Compliance with the Aspects Aiming at the Authorization and Development of Supervision and Research Special Methods. Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Law, 8(2), 11-16. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenlaw/8.2/41

Most read articles by the same author(s)