Implications Generated by the Moment Established by the Law for Introducing the Civilly Responsible Party and the Moment Up Until the Injured Person Can Constitue as a Civil Party
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenlaw/8.1/36Keywords:
preliminary chamber, the civilly responsible party, the civil party, the prejudice, the rights of the best interests of the childAbstract
The civilly responsible party can be introduced, according to art 21, alin (1), C.p.p. as modified through CCR Decision up until the end of the criminal persecution by the person in right according to the civil law, in order to be able to formulate requests and to raise exceptions in the preliminary chamber.
So, the civil party, as the person in right by the civil law, can ask to be introduced the civilly responsible party by the end of the criminal prosecution.
On the other hand, the injured person can constitue as a civil party, as art. 20, alin (1) C.p.p. statues, up until the beginning of the judicial research.
Therefore, in the situation that the civil party is not constituted up until the beginning of the preliminary chamber and she does not ask to be introduced the civilly responsible party is there an infringement of the right of the prosecuted? Nor the ones of the civilly responsible party? Are there any remedies?
References
Constitutional Court of Romania. (2004). Decizia nr. 482/2004 referitoare la admiterea excepţiei de neconstituţionalitate a dispoziţiilor art. 362 alin. 1 lit. d) din Codul de procedură penală [Decision no. 482/2004 regarding the admission of the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. 362 para. 1 lit. d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure]. Monitorul Oficial al României, 1200, 2004, December 15.
Constitutional Court of Romania. (2017). Decizia nr. 257/2017 referitoare la excepţia de neconstituţionalitate a dispoziţiilor art. 20 alin. (1) şi art. 21 alin. (1) din Codul de procedură penală [Decision no. 257/2017 regarding the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. 20 para. (1) and art. 21 para. (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure]. Monitorul Oficial al României, 472, 2017, June 22.
Constitutional Court of Romania. (2019). Decizia nr. 671/2019 referitoare la respingerea excepţiei de neconstituţionalitate a dispoziţiilor art. I pct. 3, ale art. II şi ale art. III alin. (1) din Ordonanţa de urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 1/2013 pentru modificarea şi completarea Legii nr. 263/2010 privind sistemul unitar de pensii publice [Decision no. 671/2019 regarding the rejection of the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. I pt. 3, of art. II and of art. III alin. (1) of the Government Emergency Ordinance no. 1/2013 for the amendment and completion of Law no. 263/2010 on the unitary public pension system]. Monitorul Oficial al României, 93, 2020, February 07.
Romanian Parliament. (2009). Lege nr. 287/2009 privind Codul civil [Law no. 287/2009 on the Civil Code]. Monitorul Oficial al României, 505, 2011, July 15.
Romanian Parliament. (2010). Lege nr. 135/2010 privind Codul de procedură penală [Law no. 135/2010 on the Code of Criminal Procedure]. Monitorul Oficial al României, 486, 2010, July 15.
The Constituent Assembly of Romania. (1991). Constitution of Romania. http://www.cdep.ro/pls/dic/site.page?id=339
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
LUMEN Law Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
