Empathy. A Neuropsychological Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/upasw/29/87Keywords:
empathy, prefrontal cortex, neuroscience, mental flexibility, representationsAbstract
In order for social interactions in general, and empathic understanding in particular to be carried out optimally, an adjustment of the common representations is necessary. If projecting the traits of the self upon others does not require the storage of knowledge about them, empathic understanding necessarily presupposes the inclusion of the catacteristics of others in the personal self. However, empathy means no complete overlap or confusion of one’s emotions with others, so mental flexibility becomes an important aspect of empathy. The individual needs to calibrate his own perspective, which is activated by interaction with the other, or even by his mere imagination. This calibration involves the involvement of executive functions that are mediated by the prefrontal cortex
References
Adolphs, R., Damasio, H., & Tranel, D. (2002). Neural systems for recognition of emotional
prosody: a 3-D lesion study. Emotion, 2, 23–51.
Adolphs, R., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., Cooper, G., & Damasio, A. (2000). A role for the
somatosensory cortices in the visual recognition of emotion as revealed by three dimensional lesion mapping. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 2683–2690.
Anderson, S. W., Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1999). Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 1032–1037.
Batson, C.D., Early, S., & Salvari, G. (1997). Perspective taking: imagining how another feels
versus imagining how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25,
–758.
Beer, J. S., Heerey, E. A., Keltner, D., Scabini, D., & Knight, R. T. (2003). The regulatory function of self-conscious emotion: insights from patients with orbitofrontal damage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 594–604.
Blakemore, S.-J., & Decety, J. (2001). From the perception of action to the understanding of
intention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 561–567.
Bush, G., Luu, P., & Posner, M. I. (2000). Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior
cingulate cortex. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 215–222.
Carr, L., Iacoboni, M., Dubeau, M. C., Mazziotta, J. C., & Lenzi, G. L. (2003). Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: a relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas. Proceedings of National Academy of Science USA, 100, 5497–5502.
Cicerone, K. D., & Tanebaum, L. N. (1997). Disturbance of social cognition after traumatic
orbitofrontal brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 12, 173–188.
Critchley, H. D. (2004). The human cortex responds to an interoceptive challenge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 101, 6333–6334.
Davidson, R. J. (2002). Anxiety and affective style: role of prefrontal cortex and amygdala.
Biological Psychiatry, 51, 68–80.
Decety, J., Jackson, P. L., Brunet, E. (2020). The cognitive neuropsychology of empathy. Cambridge Books Online.
Decety, J., & Chaminade, T. (2003). Neural correlates of feeling sympathy. Neuropsychologia, 41, 127–138.
Decety, J., & Grezes, J. (2006). The power of simulation: imagining one’s own and other’s
behavior. Brain Research, 1079, 4–14.
Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3, 71–100.
Decety, J., & Sommerville, J. A. (2003). Shared representations between self and others: a social cognitive neuroscience view. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 527–533.
Derryberry, D., & Rothbart, M. K. (1988). Arousal, affect, and attention as components of
temperament. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 958–966.
Eidelberg, D., & Galaburda, A. M. (1984). Inferior parietal lobule. Archives of Neurology, 41, 843–852.
Eisenberg, N., Shea, C. L., Carlo, G., & Knight, G. (1991). Empathy related responding and
cognition: A ‘chicken and the egg’ dilemma. În W. Kurtines, & J. Gewirtz (eds.), Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development (Vol. 2). Research (pp. 63–68). Erlbaum.
Ekman, P., & Davidson, R. J. (1993). Voluntary smiling changes regional brain activity.
Psychological Science, 4, 342–345.
Eslinger, P. J. (1998). Neurological and neuropsychological bases of empathy. European
Neurology, 39, 193–199.
Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London B, 358, 459–473.
Gallup, G. G. (1998). Self-awareness and the evolution of social intelligence. Behavioural
Processes, 42, 239–247.
Grattan, L. M., Bloomer, R. H., Archambault, F. X., & Eslinger, P. J. (1994). Cognitive flexibility and empathy after frontal lobe lesion. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 7, 251–257.
Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: an integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271–289.
Hutchison, W. D., Davis, K. D., Lozano, A. M., et al. (1999). Pain-related neurons in the human cingulate cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 403–405.
Jackson, D. C., Malmstadt, J. R., Larson, C. L., & Davidson, R. J. (2000). Suppression
and enhancement of emotional responses to unpleasant pictures. Psychophysiology, 37, 512–522.
Jackson, P. L., Brunet, E., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2006). Empathy examined through the neural mechanisms involved in imagining how I feel versus how you feel: an event-related fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 44, 752–761.
Jackson, P. L., & Decety, J. (2004). Motor cognition: a new paradigm to study self other
interactions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14/2, 259–263.
Jeannerod, M. (2003). The mechanisms of self-recognition. Behavioural Brain Research, 142,
–15.
Keenan, J. P., Gallup, G. G., & Falk, D. (2003). The Face in the Mirror: The Search for the Origins of Consciousness. HarperCollins Publishers.
Knoblich, G., & Flach, R. (2003). Action identity: evidence from self-recognition, prediction,
and coordination. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 620–632.
Levenson, R. W., Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1990). Voluntary facial action generates emotionspecific autonomic nervous system activity. Psychophysiology, 27, 363–384.
Levesque, J., Eugene, F., Joanette, Y., et al. (2003). Neural circuitry underlying voluntary
suppression of sadness. Biological Psychiatry, 53, 502–510.
Levine, B., Freedman, M., Dawson, D., Black, S. E., & Stuss, D. T. (1999). Ventral frontal
contribution to self-regulation: convergence of episodic memory and inhibition. Neurocase, 5, 263–275.
Ochsner, K. N., Bunge, S.A., Gross, J. J., & Gabrieli, J.D. E. (2002). Rethinking feelings: an
fMRI study of the cognitive regulation of emotion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1215–1229.
Phillips, M. L., Young, A.W., Senior, C., et al. (1997). A specific neural substrate for perceiving facial expressions of disgust. Nature, 389, 495–498.
Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 1–72.
Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154.
Rankin, K. P., Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Weiner, M. W., & Miller, B. L. (2003). Neuroanatomy of impaired empathy in frontotemporal dementia. 55th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurologists, Honolulu.
Reiman, E. M., Lane, R. D., Ahern, G. L., et al. (1997). Neuroanatomical correlates of externally and internally generated emotion. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 918–925.
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying
the understanding and the imitation of action. Nature Review Neuroscience, 2, 661– 670.
Royzman, E. B., Cassidy, K. W., & Baron, J. (2003). I know you know: epistemic egocentrism in children and adults. Review of General Psychology, 7, 38–65.
Ruby, P., & Decety, J. (2001). Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: a PET investigation of agency. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 546–550.
Ruby, P., & Decety, J. (2004). How would you feel versus how do you think she would feel? A neuroimaging study of perspective taking with social emotions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 988–999.
Seger, C. A., Stone, M., & Keenan, J. P. (2004). Cortical activations during judgments about the self and an other person. Neuropsychologia, 42(9), 1168–1177.
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Tomer, R., Berger, B. D., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2003). Characterization of empathy deficits following prefrontal brain damage: the role of right ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 1–14.
Shaw, P., Lawrence, E. J., Radbourne, C., et al. (2004). The impact of early and late damage to the human amygdala on ‘theory of mind’ reasoning. Brain, 127, 1535–1548.
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J., et al. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective
but not sensory components of pain. Science, 303, 1157–1161.
Snowden, J. S., Gibbons, Z. C., Blackshaw, A., et al. (2003). Social cognition in frontotemporal dementia and Huntington’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 41, 688–701.
Stone, V. E., Baron-Cohen, S., Calder, A., Keane, J., & Young, A. (2003). Acquired theory of
mind impairments in individuals with bilateral amygdala lesions. Neuropsychologia, 41, 209–220.
Stone, V. E., Baron-Cohen, S., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Frontal lobe contributions to theory of
mind. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 640–646.
Stuss, D. T., Gallup, G., & Alexander, M. P. (2001). The frontal lobes are necessary for theory of mind. Brain, 124, 279–286.
Stuss, D. T., & Levine, B. (2002). Adult clinical neuropsychology: lessons from studies of the
frontal lobes. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 401–433.
Wallbott, H. G. (1991). Recognition of emotion from facial expression via imitation? Some
indirect evidence for an old theory. British Journal Social Psychology, 30, 207–219.
Wicker, B., Keysers, C., Plailly, J., et al. (2003). Both of us disgusted in my insula: the common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron, 40, 655–664.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Anuarul Universitatii "Petre Andrei" din Iasi & LUMEN Publishing House

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).