On the Problem of Lexical Meaning Representation: A Semiotic Aspect

Authors

  • Halyna Onyshchak Uzhhorod National University
  • Kateryna Nykytchenko Kyiv National Linguistic University
  • Nataliia Loskutova Mariupol State University
  • Inna Berkeshchuk Kamianets-Podilskyi Ivan Ohiienko National University
  • Nadiia Horbach The Municipal Higher Educational Institution "Lutsk Pedagogical College" of the Volyn Regional Council
  • Nataliia Stakhniuk Kamianets-Podіlskyi Ivan Ohiienko National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/15.3/771

Keywords:

Seme stock, formalized analysis, lexical semantics, quantitative and qualitative characteristics, common and distinctive features

Abstract

The paper provides comparative analysis of the seme stocks denoting good in modern English and French. The formalized analysis of lexical semantics integrating both mathematical and purely linguistic methods has been employed to conduct the research. The study shows that each word in question is internally structured and presents an organized hierarchy of lexical meanings.

The seme stocks of the nouns denoting good in English and French present hierarchical systems, subdivided into subsets of polyfunctional, semes with the average degree of functionality, and monofunctional. The comparison of the seme stocks under study has shown that they differ in quantitative characteristics more than qualitative ones. The views on good are partially concurrent in the English and French language world pictures. Both cultures associate it with a good-doer, his/her inner world, social rank, acts of favour, courteous attitude to others, spiritual and material values that promote the highest happiness. The distinctive features reveal the socio-pragmatic character of the concept in English and socially conditioned – in French.

References

Ahearn, L. M. (2017). Living Language: An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell. http://doi.org/10.1002/9781444340563

Asoulin, E. (2018). Language as an instrument of thought. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 1(1): 46, pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.34

Beni, M. D. (2019). Cognitive Structural Realism: A Radical Solution to the Problem of Scientific Representation. Switzerland: Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05114-3

Bibok, K. (2019). A Lexical Pragmatic Account of Polysemy. Argumentum, vol. 15, pp. 145-154. https://argumentum.unideb.hu/2019-anyagok/special_issue_I/bibokk.pdf

Brinton, L. J., Brinton, D. M. (2010). The Linguistic Structure of Modern English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.156

Carston, R. (2010). Explicit communication and ‘free’ pragmatic enrichment. In Belén, S., & Romero, E. (Eds.), Explicit Communication: Robyn Carston’s Pragmatics (pp. 217-285). Palgrave Macmillan. http://doi.org/10.1057/9780230292352_14

Chandler, D. (2017). Semiotics: The Basics. 3d ed. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315311050

Cruse, D. A. (2000). Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.014

Evans, V. (2009). How Words Mean: Lexical Concepts, cognitive Models, and Meaning Construction. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234660.001.0001

Fabian, M. (2019). Comparative Research of Etiquette Nouns in English, Ukrainian and Hungarian. In: Development of Philology and Linguistics at the Modern Historical Period (pp. 161-179). Liha Pres. https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-146-9/161-179

Finch, G. (2013). Word of Mouth: A New Introduction to Language and Communication. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://books.google.ne/books?id=BUQdBQAAQBAJ

Geeraerts, D. (2010). Theories of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://books.google.com.ua/books?hl=uk&lr=&id=JC8TDAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=Geeraerts,+D.+(2010).+Theories+of+Lexical+Semantics.+Oxford:+doi&ots=sBEL3JWuDh&sig=50kwsZI8no-l4aNikM_y6oD5spU&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Geeraerts, D. (2014). Deliteralization and the Birth of ‘Emotion’. In Masataka, Y., Dennis, T., & Blount, B. (Eds.), Approaches to Language, Culture, and Cognition: The Intersection of Cognitive Linguistics and Linguistic Anthropology (pp. 50–67). Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9781137274823

Gilbert, L., Laḉane, R., & Niobey, G. (1986). Grand Larousse de la Langue Française en 7 vols. https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k1200532b.texteImage

Gillon, B. S. (2019). Natural Language Semantics: Formation and Valuation. Cambridge/London: The MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/natural-language-semantics

Goddard, C. (2018). Ten Lectures on Natural Semantic Metalanguage: Exploring Language, Thought and Culture Using Simple Translatable Words. Leiden / Boston: Brill. https://brill.com/view/title/35972

Goddard, C., & Wierzbicka, A. (2014). Words and Meanings: Lexical Semantics across Domains, Languages and Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://salahlibrary.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/words-and-meanings-lexical-semantics.pdf

Israel, M. (2014). Semantics: How Language Makes Sense. In: How Languages Work: An Introduction to Language and Linguistics. Ed. C. Genetti. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 150–179. https://salahlibrary.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/how-languages-work-an-introduction-to-languages-and-linguistics.pdf

Jaszczolt, K. M. (2016). Meaning in Linguistic Interaction: Semantics, Metasemantics, Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://books.google.com.ua/books?hl=en&lr=&id=5iXRCwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&ots=zqmRbIel1H&sig=zNSLypKotev0blDojn9EQtM2RPU&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Konnova, M., & Babenko, N. (2019). Conceptual Metaphors of Time in English: An Axiological Perspective. Lege Artis. Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, IV (2), pp. 86–127. https://lartis.sk/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/KonnovaBabenko_Issue-2_2019.pdf

Kornai, A. (2020). Semantics. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65645-8

Kroeger, P. R. (2019). Analyzing Meaning: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Berlin: Language Science Press. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/c1bfc918-bc36-42fd-afc8-628f33b6b1d4/1000382.pdf

Lyons, J. (1981). Language and Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com.ua/books/about/Language_and_Linguistics.html?hl=fr&id=8Wg57a3DdYYC&redir_esc=y

Lyons, J. (1995). Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com.ua/books/about/Linguistic_Semantics.html?id=Na2g1ltaKuAC&redir_esc=y

Mel’čuc, I., & Milićević, J. (2020). An Advanced Introduction to Semantics: A Meaning-Text Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339914726_An_Advanced_Introduction_to_Semantics_A_Meaning-Text_Approach

Mel’čuc, I., & Polguère, A. (2018). Theory and Practice of Lexicographic Definition. Jornal of Cognitive Science, 19(4), pp. 417–470. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330011634_Theory_and_Practice_of_Lexicographic_Definition

Nerubasska, A., Maksymchuk, B. (2020). The Demarkation of Creativity, Talent and Genius in Humans: a Systemic Aspect. Postmodern Openings, 11 (2), 240-255. https://www.lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/po/article/view/2625

Nerubasska, A., Palshkov, K., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). A Systemic Philosophical Analysis of the Contemporary Society and the Human: New Potential. Postmodern Openings, 11(4), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.4/235

Nykytchenko, K. (2019). Nonce Words in Mass Media Discourse (A Case Study of Travel Journalism Innovations). Communication Today, 10 (1), pp. 62–75. https://www.communicationtoday.sk/nonce-words-in-mass-media-discourse-a-case-study-of-travel-journalism-innovations/

Onishchuk, I., Ikonnikova, M., Antonenko, T., Kharchenko, I., Shestakova, S., Kuzmenko, N., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). Characteristics of Foreign Language Education in Foreign Countries and Ways of Applying Foreign Experience in Pedagogical Universities of Ukraine. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(3), 44-65. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.3/308

Onyshchak, H. (2018). Systemno-strukturna parametryzaciya leksyko-semantychnoyi hrupy “Zlo” v ukrayinsjkij, anhlijsjkij ta francuzjkij movax (System and Structural Parametrization of the Lexico-Semantic Group “Evil” in Ukrainian, English and French). [Dissertation Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Philology (PhD), Uzhhorod National University, Kyiv National Linguistic University]. http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/ASUA/1468416

Oxford English Dictionary in 20 volumes on CD-ROM (v. 4.0). 2nd ed. (2009) Oxford: Oxford University Press

Paolucci, C. (2021). Cognitive Semiotics: Integrating Signs, Minds, Meaning and Cognition. Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42986-7

Pirelli, V., Plag, I., & Dressler, W. U. (2019). Word Knowledge in a Cross-Disciplinary World. In Pirelli, V., Plag, I., & Dressler, W. U. (Eds.), Word Knowledge and Word Usage: A Cross-Disciplinary Guide to the Mental Lexicon (pp. 1–20). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110440577-001

Prihodko, G. (2019). Polistatusnist katehorii otsinky [Polystatus Nature of the Evaluation Category]. Naukovyi zhurnal Lvivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu bezpeky zhyttiediialnosti “Lvivskyi filolohichnyi chasopys” [Scientific journal of the Lviv State University of Life Safety “Philological Periodical of Lviv”], vol. 5, pp. 128–133. https://doi.org/10.32447/2663-340X-2019-5-22

Pustejovsky, J., & Batiukova, O. (2019). The Lexicon. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com.ua/books?hl=en&lr=&id=q1N-DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR15&ots=ndKOxNqIZt&sig=j82c7GLoAUDkws-JF90n2YtU1jg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Sharifian, F. (2017). Cultural Linguistics: Cultural Conceptualizations and Language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345061412_Cultural_Linguistics_Cultural_conceptualisations_and_language

Valenzuela, J. (2017). Meaning in English: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/9781316156278

Violi, P. (2018). Regularities and Singularities in the Encyclopaedic Labyrynth. In Galkowski, A. & Kopytowska, M. (Eds.), Current Perspectives in Semiotics: Signs, Signification, and Communication (pp. 47-57). Peter Lang GmbH. http://doi.org/10.3726/b14638

Weiner, E. (2018). Modelling Lexical Structures in the Oxford English Dictionary. In Hoffman, S., Sand, A., Arndt-Lappe, S., & Marie, L. (Eds.), Corpora and Lexis (pp. 7-39). Brill Rodopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004361133_003

Wierzbicka, A. (2014). Imprisoned in English: The Hazards of English as a Default Language. 1st ed. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press. http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199321490.001.0001

Wu, Y., & Yuan, Y. (2019). Lexical Ontological Semantics. London/New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315720463

Ye, Z. (2017). The Semantics of Nouns: A Cross-linguistic and Cross-Domain Perspective. In Ye, Z. (Ed.), The Semantics of Nouns (pp. 1-18). Oxford University Press. http://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198736721.001.0001

Downloads

Published

2023-09-01

How to Cite

Onyshchak, H., Nykytchenko, K., Loskutova , N., Berkeshchuk, I., Horbach, N., & Stakhniuk, N. (2023). On the Problem of Lexical Meaning Representation: A Semiotic Aspect. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 15(3), 360-375. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/15.3/771

Issue

Section

Reform, change and innovation in education

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now