The Impact of Feedback on Students’ Autonomous ESP Learning Outcomes

Authors

  • Natalia Yevheniivna Dmitrenko Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University
  • Iuliia Oleksiivna Budas Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.2/424

Keywords:

autonomous ESP learning, feedback, foreign language proficiency, English for Specific Purposes, educational process, proficiency of professionally oriented English communication

Abstract

The present paper provides the results of the feedback influence on students’ autonomous ESP learning. It is aimed to study the impact of feedback on autonomous learning outcomes of first-year students, who are studying a two-year university course of “English for Specific Purposes (ESP)”, the significant part of which is dedicated to self-regulated learning. The aim of the course is to improve the students’ proficiency in professionally oriented English communication to the level of B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). The investigation has proved the importance of teachers’ support in students’ autonomous ESP learning. The outcomes of those students who received the feedback regularly signify that even being self-sufficient, students strive for teachers’ or peer observation and feedback in the educational process. In the article, the interdependence between the level of students’ autonomous ESP learning competence and students’ feedback literacy is presented. The results of the study suggest that students’ autonomous ESP learning outcomes are considerably influenced by supportive external written feedback if it is sought, and their feedback literacy level is at least moderate or higher. A higher level of students’ feedback literacy is observed among students with a more advanced level of autonomous ESP learning competence and who demonstrate better academic achievements in professionally oriented English communication. The coherence of the elaborated levels of Ukrainian students’ feedback literacy and the ways of its enhancing can be significant for educators in other countries.

Author Biography

Natalia Yevheniivna Dmitrenko, Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University

PhD in Pedagogy, Associate Professor of the Department of Methods of Foreign Languages Teaching at Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University (Vinnytsia, Ukraine); Doctoral Student of Kyiv National Linguistics University.

References

Balzer, W., Doherty, M., & O’Connor, R. (1989). Effects of cognitive feedback on performance. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 410-433.

Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38 (6), 698-712.

Boud, D., Lawson, R., & Thompson D. (2015). The Calibration of Student Judgement through Self-Assessment: Disruptive Effects of Assessment Patterns. Higher Education Research & Development, 34 (1), 45-59.

Boud, D., Lawson, R., & Thompson, D. (2013). Does Student Engagement in Self-Assessment Calibrate Their Judgement over Time? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38 (8), 941-956.

Burksaitienie, N. (2012). Promoting Student Learning Through Feedback in Higher Education. Socialinių mokslų studijos: mokslo darbai, 4(1), 33-46.

Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical syntheses. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281.

Carless, D. (2013). Trust and Its Role in Facilitating Dialogic Feedback. In Feedback in Higher and Professional Education: Understanding It and Doing It Well, edited by D. Boud and E. Molloy, 90-103. London: Routledge.

Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354

Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implication for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 4, 33-67.

Dickinson, L. (1987). Self-instruction in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dmitrenko, N., Nikolaeva, S., Melnyk, L., & Voloshyna, O. (2020). Autonomous ESP Learning of Prospective Teachers of Mathematics. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 2020, 12(1), 86-104. doi.org/10.18662/rrem/201

Esterhazy, R., & Damsa, C. (2017). Unpacking the Feedback Process: An Analysis of Undergraduate Students’ Interactional Meaning-Making of Feedback Comments. Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1359249.

Gökçe, Erturan-Ilker. (2014). Effects of feedback on achievement goals and perceived motivational climate in physical education. Issues in Educational Research, 24(2), 152-161.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77 (1), 81-113.

Hattie, J., & Yates, G. (2014). Using Feedback to Promote learning in V. A. Benassi, C. E. Overson, & C. M. Hakala (Eds.), Applying science of learning in education: Infusing psychological science into the curriculum. pp.45-58. Society for the Teaching of Psychology.

Linn, R. L., & Miller, M. D. (2005). Measurement and assessment in teaching (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Little, D. (2007). Reconstructing Learner and Teacher Autonomy in Language Education, in Barfield, A., & Brown, S. (Eds.) Reconstructing Autonomy in Language Education: Inquiry and Innovation. pp 1-13. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Nicol, D., Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, Volume 31, 199-218. doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Nunan D. (2003). Nine steps to Learner Autonomy. In Nunan, D. (Ed.), Practical English Language Teaching. New York. McGraw Hill.

Pintrich, P. R., & Zucho, A. (2002). Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom, in: J. C. Smart and W. G. Tierney (Eds). Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research , Volume XVII. New York, Agathon Press.

Robinson, S., Pope, D., & Holyoak, L. (2013). Can we meet their expectations? Experiences and perceptions of feedback in the first year undergraduate students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. Vol.38, №3, 260-272. doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.629291

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144. doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714

Schommer, M. (1993). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 406-411.

Sutton, P. (2012). Conceptualizing Feedback Literacy: Knowing, Being, and Acting. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 49 (1), 31-40.

Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2017). Developing Evaluative Judgement: Enabling Students to Make Decisions about the Quality of Work. Higher Education. doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3

Xu, J. (2009). A survey study of autonomous learning by Chinese non-English major post-graduates. English language teaching, 4 (2), 25-32.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-13

How to Cite

Dmitrenko, N. Y., & Budas, I. O. (2021). The Impact of Feedback on Students’ Autonomous ESP Learning Outcomes. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 13(2), 323-339. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.2/424