Creative Pedagogical Development of Students Based on the Implementation of Didactic Games
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.4/339Keywords:
Creative development, didactic games, students, teacher educationAbstract
This article discusses the implementation of innovative technologies in the process of training students of a pedagogical university. The purpose of the study: to develop a set of didactic games for students - future teachers and experimentally prove the effectiveness of its implementation to enhance their creative pedagogical development. The experimental study was attended by full-time, part-time and evening students (n=286) of the Pedagogical Institute. Students of the experimental group implemented a set of special didactic games (n=14) in extracurricular activities during the school year. Didactic games were implemented by students independently on the basis of a university-wide student scientific society at the center of the council of students and student scientific initiatives. Didactic games for research and practical implementation were differentiated by target, long-term and structural features. The obtained statistical data in the study (p<0.05) proved the effectiveness of introducing a variety of didactic games in extracurricular time of students without the participation of teachers, in the mode of independent control over the process of their conduct. The didactic games implemented during the school year had a significant positive impact on creative pedagogical development through raising the level of creative well-being, communication skills and pedagogical improvisation of students. The study revealed new scientific data on the processes of increasing creative extracurricular activities of students and patterns that exist in the studied pedagogical science on this issue. This is one of the key conditions for improving the quality of professional training of future teachers.
References
Baryshnikov, N. V., & Bernshteyn, V. L. (2018). The formation of professional communicative intercultural competence: summarising the experience and searching for new didactic solutions. Yazyk i kultura-language and culture, 43, 136 - 147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2010.540328
Beghetto, R. A. (2016). Creative learning: a fresh look. Journal of cognitive education and psychology, 15(1), 6 - 23. DOI: 10.1891/1945-8959.15.1.6.
Bereczki, E. O., & Karpati, A. (2018). Teachers' beliefs about creativity and its nurture: A systematic review of the recent research literature. Educational research review, 23, 25 - 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.10.003
Byrge, C., & Tang, C. (2015). Embodied creativity training: Effects on creative self-efficacy and creative production. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 16, 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.01.002
Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4
Chagovets, A., Chychuk, A., Bida, O., Kuchai, O., Salnyk, I., & Poliakova, I. (2020). Formation of Motivation for Professional Communication among Future Specialists of Pedagogical Education. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(1), 20-38. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/197
Cheung, C. K., Rudowicz, E., Yue, X. D., & Kwan, A. S. F. (2003). Creativity of university students: Whet is the impact of field and year of study? Journal of creative behavior, 37(1), 42 - 63. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2003.tb00825.x
Cheung, R. H. P. (2012). Teaching for creativity: Examining the beliefs of early childhood teachers and their influence on teaching practices. Australasian journal of early childhood, 37(3), 43 - 51. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911203700307
Daly, S. R., Mosyjowski, E. A., & Seifert, C. M. (2019). Teaching creative process across disciplines. Journal of creative behavior, 53(1), 5 - 17. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.158
Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education-A systematic literature review. Thinking skills and creativity, 8, 80 - 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004
Deguang, Z. (2012). Using games to improve students’ communicative ability. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(4), 801 – 805. DOI:10.4304/jltr.3.4.801-805.
Dvoryatkina, S., Dyakina, A., & Shcherbatykh, S. (2019). Project technologies in a university’s media educational strategy in developing a probabilistic style of thinking for future mathematics teachers. Amazonia Investiga, 8(23), 526 - 537.
Fedirchyk, T., & Nitalia N. (2019). Formation of methodology culture of would-be elementary school teachers in the context of introduction of “New Ukrainian School” concept. Revista Românească pentru Educaţie Multidimensională, 11(1), 41 - 56. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/95
Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Creativity and academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Journal of educational psychology, 109(2), 269 - 299. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000133
Goldenberg, O., & Wiley, J. (2019). Individual and group brainstorming: does the question matter? Creativity research journal, 31(3), 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1619399
Gribanov, D. V., Kovalenko, K. E., & Kovalenko, N. E. (2018). Educational business games in the educational process. Revista conrado, 14(61), 191 - 194. https://conrado.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/conrado/article/view/640
Hemdan, A. H., & Kazim, A. M. (2019). Creativity development of high-achieving students. Creativity research journal, 31(3), 296 - 308. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1641684
Hernandez-Torrano, D. & Ibrayeva, L. (2020). Creativity and education: A bibliometric mapping of the research literature (1975-2019). Thinking skills and creativity, 35, 100625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100625
Justice, L. J., & Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2015). Identifying the barriers to games and simulations in education: creating a valid and reliable survey. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 44(1), 86 - 125. doi:10.1177/0047239515588161.
Kampylis, P., Berki, E., & Saariluoma, P. (2009). In-service and prospective teachers' conceptions of creativity. Thinking skills and creativity, 4(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.10.001
Klinkov, G., Rodionov, M., Kozlova, O., Vezetiu, E., & Vovk, E. (2020). Implementation of discussion technologies in a personality-centered professional education. Amazonia Investiga, 9(26), 82 - 87. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.26.02.9
Kostikova, I., Holubnycha, L., Shchokina, T., Soroka, N., Budianska, V., & Marykivska, H. (2019). A role-playing game as a means of effective professional english teaching. Amazonia Investiga, 8(24), 414 - 425. https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/1001
Maksic, S. B. & Spasenovic, V. Z. (2018). Educational science students' implicit theories of creativity. Creativity research journal, 30(3), 287 - 294. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1488200
Moizer, J., Lean, J., Towler, M., & Abbey, C. (2009). Simulations and games: Overcoming the barriers to their use in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(3), 207 - 224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787409343188
Mumford, M. D., & McIntosh, T. (2017). Creative thinking processes: the past and the future. Journal of creative behavior, 51(4), 317 - 322. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.197
Nagovitsyn, R. S., Bartosh, D. K., Ratsimor, A. Y. & Maksimov, Y. G. (2018). Formation of social tolerance among future teachers. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 7(4), 754 - 763. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.28.04.22
Nagovitsyn, R. S., Osipov, A. Y., Kudryavtsev, M. D., Markov, K. K., Savchuk, A. N., Zakharova, L. V., & Orlova I. I. (2020). Styles of professional activity of a teacher of higher education of a pedagogical profile. Amazonia Investiga, 9(26), 341 - 348. doi: 10.34069/AI/2020.26.02.39
Nagovitsyn, R. S., Volkov, P. B., & Miroshnichenko, A. A. (2017). Planning of physical load of annual cycle of students', practicing cyclic kinds of sports, training. Physical education of students, 21(3), 126 - 133. https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2017.0305
Nagovitsyn, R. S., Zamolotskikh, E. G., Potashova, I. I., & Rybakova L. V. (2019). Model of the system of raising the social status of the teacher in the region on the basis of a pedagogical university. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 8(2), 315 - 327. doi: 10.13187/ejced.2019.2.315.
Osipov, A., Kudryavtsev, M., Kopylov, Y., Kuzmin, V., Panov, E., & Kramida, I. (2018). The possibility of a significant increase in the level of motor activity in students with the use of the potential of computer technology. Physical education of students, 22(5), 265 - 271. doi: 10.15561/20755279.2018.0506.
Oztop, P., Katsikopoulos, K., & Gummerum, M. (2018). Creativity through connectedness: the role of closeness and perspective taking in group creativity. Creativity research journal, 30(3), 266 - 275. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1488347
Pilcher, K. (2017). Politicising the 'personal': the resistant potential of creative pedagogies in teaching and learning 'sensitive' issues. Teaching in higher education, 22(8), 975 - 990. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1332030
Sushchenko, L., Gladysh, M., Zubtsova, Y., Sushchenko, R., & Kniazian, M. (2020). Organization of research work of future pedagogues in higher education institutions: experiential learning results. Revista Românească pentru Educaţie Multidimensională, 12(1), 265 - 290. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.2Sup1/294
Tejedor, G., Segalas, J., Barron, A., Fernandez-Morilla, M., & Fuertes, M. T. (2019). Didactic strategies to promote competencies in sustainability. Sustainability, 11(7), 2086. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072086
Vaganova, O. I., Smirnova, E. V., Bezusova, T. A., Gordienko, T. P., & Baikina, J. O. (2020). Training in cooperation with the use of information technology. Amazonia investiga, 9(27), 501 - 508. doi: 10.34069/AI/2020.27.03.54.
Zhang, W., Sun, S. L., Jiang, Y., & Zhang, W. Y. (2019). Openness to experience and team creativity: effects of knowledge sharing and transformational leadership. Creativity research journal, 31(1), 62 - 73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1577649
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journalright of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
