Evaluation of Primary School Mathematics Curricula of Northern and Southern Cyprus for NCTM Principles and Standards
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.3/306Keywords:
NCTM Principles, NCTM Standards, Primary School Mathematics Curricula, Northern Cyprus, Southern Cyprus.Abstract
Although the basic knowledge and skills that each generation must acquire vary by country, such knowledge and skills are somewhat standardized depending on the requirements of the modern era. As one of the basic parts of education, curricula are essential in that they include the knowledge, communication and technological developments required by the age. The objective of this study is to analyze the primary school 3rd grade mathematics education curricula in Northern and Southern Cyprus in line with NCTM (National Council of Teacher of Mathematics) principles and standards and to evaluate them according to teachers' opinions. In the research, document analysis and the interview technique, which are both qualitative analysis methods, were used. As a result of the study, it has been observed that the 3rd grade mathematics curricula in Northern and Southern Cyprus have similarities and differences in line with NCTM principles and standards. As a result of this comparison, it has been found that there are differences in NCTM principles in terms of equity, learning and assessment-evaluation. It has also been determined that in terms of standards, there are differences in geometry, measuring and data analysis-probability of the ‘content’ element, as well as in the notation and expression of the ‘process’ element. In addition, although the opinions of the teachers were analyzed and a common view was put forward with regard to several topics, it was concluded that there were differences of opinion regarding 'which course content should be used in mathematics lessons' and 'whether the mathematics curriculum should be changed or whether it is satisfactory’.
References
Adams, A. A. (1999, November 17-19). An evaluation of a district-developed NCTM standards-based elementary school mathematics curriculum. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Point Clear, Alabama.
Alshehri, M. A., & Ali, H. S. (2016). The Compatibility of Developed Mathematics Textbooks' Content in Saudi Arabia (Grades 6-8) with NCTM Standards. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(2), 137-142. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1089809.pdf
Blanton, M., Stephens, A., Knuth, E., Murphy Gardiner, A., Isler, I., & Kim, J. (2015). The development of children’s algebraic thinking: The impact of a comprehensive early algebra intervention in third grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 39–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.1.0039
Boote, S. K., & Boote, D. N. (2018). ABC problem in elementary mathematics education: Arithmetic before comprehension. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 21, 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-016-9350-2
Bråting, K., Madej, L., & Hemmi, K. (2019). Development of algebraic thinking: opportunities offered by the Swedish curriculum and elementary mathematics textbooks. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 24(1), 27–49.
Büyüköztürk, S., Kiliç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2012). Scientific Research Methods (18th Edition). Pegem Academy Publishing.
Çağlar, M. (2003). A comparative study on math education rendered in the educational systems in the two societies on the Island of Cyprus. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(2), 3-13. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1101934.pdf
Casa, T.M., MacSwan, J. R., LaMonica, K. E., Colonnese, M. W. & Firmender, J. M., (2019). An analysis of the amount and characteristics of writing prompts in Grade 3 mathematics student books. School Science and Mathematics, 119, 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12333
Der-Ching, Y. (2018). Study of fractions in elementary mathematics textbooks from Finland and Taiwan. Educational Studies, 44(2), 190-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2017.1347493
Doğanay, A. (2007). Üst düzey düşünme becerilerinin öğretimi. A. Doğanay (ed.), Öğretim ilke ve yöntemleri [Teaching of higher-order thinking skills. A. Doğanay (Ed.), Teaching principles and methods], (pp.279-331). PegemA Publishing.
Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri: Felsefe Yöntem Analiz [Qualitative research methods in social sciences: philosophy method analysis, (2nd Edition)]. Seckin.
Handal, B., & Herrington, A. (2003). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and curriculum reform. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(1), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217369
Weinberg, P. (2019). Generalizing and Proving in an Elementary Mathematics Teacher Education Program: Moving Beyond Logic. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, science and technology education, 15(9), em1740. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108450.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2015). Qualitative data analysis (Trans. Ed Sadegül Akbaba Altun and Ali Ersoy). Pegem Academy.
Ministry of Education and Culture. (2016a). Annual report 2016, Southern Cyprus. http://www.moec.gov.cy/en/annual_reports/annual_report_2016_en.pdf.
Ministry of National Education and Culture. (2016b). Annual report 2016, Northern Cyprus. http://talimterbiye.mebnet.net/Ogretim%20Programlari/2016-2017/Dersler/mat1-8.pdf
Ministry of National Education and Culture. (2017a). Annual report 2017, Southern Cyprus. http://www.moec.gov.cy/en/annual_reports/annual_report_2017_en.pdf .
Ministry of National Education and Culture. (2017b). Annual report 2016, Northern Cyprus. http://talimterbiye.mebnet.net/Ogretim%20Programlari/2017-2018/OgerimProgramlari/matematik.pdf
Ministry of National Education and Culture. (2018). Temel Eğitim Programı (Matematik Dersi Öğretim Programı 1. – 8. Sınıflar) [Basic Education Program (Mathematics Education Curriculum 1.-8. Grades)]. Okman Printing Ltd. http://talimterbiye.mebnet.net/Ogretim%20Programlari/2018-2019/Matematik.pdf
Mink, D. V. & Fraser, B. J. (2005). Evaluation of a K-5 mathematics program which integrates children’s literature: classroom environment and attitudes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 59–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-2975-0
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2019a). Executive Summary, Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. https://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Standards_and_Positions/PSSM_ExecutiveSummary.pdf
NCTM Publications, (2019b). 2018-19 Catalog. https://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Publications/NCTM-Catalog-1819.pdf
Osgood, C. E. (1962). Studies on the generality of affective meaning systems. American Psychologist, 17(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045146
Özreçberoğlu, N., & Çağanağa, Ç. K. (2016). Differences between the educational system in mathematics in South Korea and TRNC. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports &Science Education, 5(2), 21-37. http://www.ijge.info/ojs/index.php/IJTASE/article/view/486
Sawada, D. (1997). NCTM's standards in Japanese elementary schools. Teaching Children Mathematics, 4(1), 20-23. https://www.nctm.org/Publications/Teaching-Children-Mathematics/1997/Vol1/Issue1/Full-issue-PDF-of-Teaching-Children-Mathematics-volume-4,-number-1-(September-1997)_/
Şimşek, H., & Yıldırım, A. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Seckin Publishing.
Umay, A., Akkuş, O., & Paksu, A. D. (2006). Examination of Mathematics Course 1st – 5th Grade Curriculum According to NCTM Principles and Standards. Journal of Hacettepe Education Faculty, 31, 198-211.http://efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/844-published.pdf
Uysal, R., & İncikabı, L. (2017). A Research on the General Purposes of the Last Period Mathematics Teaching Programs. Ondokuz Mayıs University Journal of Education Faculty, 37(1), 223-247. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/489114
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journalright of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND