@article{Stanciu_David_2022, title={Discursive Hypostatisations. Philosophic, Scientific, Literary, Artistic and Religious Discursivity}, volume={13}, url={https://www.lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/po/article/view/4647}, DOI={10.18662/po/13.1/401}, abstractNote={<p><em>The realm of discursivity is in truth heteroclite, submitted to metamor-phoses that testify the various correspondences between the axis of being (the on) and that of the existent (gegonos) is testified. Discursivity “pre-sentifies” in a manifested manner a referent that at the same time is not able to determine its existence without associating itself with a situation of knowledge, implicitly with a form of rendering and representation. Be-ing articulated as a conceptual hypostatisation of reason (the philosophic discourse), or a form that creates significance (the artistic discourse), a textual and socio-historical device (the literary discourse),  as a closing up of the circle of interpretations (the scientific discourse) or as resignation in silence (the religious discourse), discourse itself emerges as a reflection of conscience about things, that is, it acts, produces, searches for affirmation, thus and ultimately crafting out a possible world.</em></p>}, number={1}, journal={Postmodern Openings}, author={Stanciu, Raluca - and David, Anca-Elena}, year={2022}, month={Jan.}, pages={363-371} }