Innovative Teaching Technologies in Postmodern Education: Foreign and Domestic Experience

Authors

  • Olena Haidamaka Institute of Education Content Modernization,Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Yuliia Kolisnyk-Humeniuk National Pedagogical Dragomanov University, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Liudmyla Storizhko National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute", Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Tetiana Marchenko Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, Lutsk, Ukraine
  • Iryna Poluboiaryna Kharkiv National I.P. Kotlyarevsky University of Arts, Kharkiv, Ukraine
  • Nataliia Bilova South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky, Odesa, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.1Sup1/419

Keywords:

Postmodern approach, postmodern tendencies, professionalization of future specialists, the needs of applicants for education, professional competence of a teacher, higher school, educational process

Abstract

The article provides a theoretical analysis of the study of the issue of introducing innovations into educational activities on the basis of foreign and domestic experience of postmodern education. The essence of the problem of introducing innovative technologies in the system of postmodern education in the countries of the world and in Ukraine is revealed. The role of the teacher's professional competence in the application of innovative techniques for organizing the educational process was emphasized. The essential features of postmodern tendencies in foreign and domestic education and teaching practice are combined. In the context of professional postmodern education and to optimize innovative teaching with postmodern tendencies, pedagogical recommendations were submitted on the new conditions and requirements of innovative teaching. The goals of the article, as well as its scientific novelty, theoretical and practical significance for postmodern or innovative pedagogy are determined. It is substantiated that the development of innovative technologies in the field of training future specialists is carried out on the basis of a postmodern approach to the analysis of vocational education, which was integrated by means of personality-oriented, activity-based, professional-creative and psychological-pedagogical approaches at the systemic universal level. Considered professional requirements for educators-innovators.

References

Artyomov, I. V. (2015). Innovatsiyi u vyshchiy osviti: vitchyznyanyy i zarubizhnyy dosvid [Innovations in higher education: domestic and foreign experience]. State University «Uzhhorod National University». Educational and Research Institute Of European Integration Studies. https://www.uzhnu.edu.ua/uk/infocentre/get/9701

Askeland, G. A., & Payne, M. (2006). The postmodern student: piloting through uncertainty. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 26(3/4), 167-179. https://doi.org/10.1300/J067v26n03_11

Bakhtiyarova Kh. (Ed.). (2017). Innovatsiyni tekhnolohiyi navchannya [Innovative learning technologies Textbook for students of higher technical educational institutions]. National Technical University. https://ukreligieznavstvo.wordpress.com/2019/01/18/itn

Baldzhy, E., & Palamarchuk, O. (2017). Osobystisnyy ta profesiynyy rozvytok suchasnoho vykladacha-lidera [Personal and professional development of a modern teacher-leader]. Higher education of Ukraine (pp. 6–9). Education for Leadership, Intelligence and Talent Encouraging. https://ihed.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/conf_Elite-III_05.2017_ELITE.Education-for-Leadership_VOU_II-2017-170p.pdf

Beck, C. (1993). Postmodernism, Pedagogy and Philosophy of Education. Philosophy of Education, 27, 1-13. http://www.ed.uiuc/edu/EPS/PES_Yearbook

Best, S., & Kellner, D. (1991). Postmodern Theory: Critical interrogations. Guilford Press.

Bondarchuk, V. H. (2020). Osoblyvosti innovatsiynykh osvitnikh tekhnolohiy [Peculiarities of innovative educational technologies]. In V. H. Bondarchuk (Ed.), Interaktyvnyy osvitniy prostir universytetiv [Interactive educational space of universities: materials of the all-Ukrainian scientific-practical webinar]. Vinnytsia Institute of Trade and Economics. http://www.vtei.com.ua/doc/doc/27_04_2020_zb_.pdf

Bryant, I., Johnston, R. & Usher, R. (1997). Adult Education and the Postmodern Challenge. Learning beyond the Limits. Routledge.

Burbules, N. C. (2010). Postmodernism and Education . In H. Siegel (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195312881.003.0029

Dubasenyuk, O. A. (2009). Innovatsiyni osvitni tekhnolohiyi ta metodyky v systemi profesiyno-pedahohichnoyi pidhotovky [Innovative educational technologies and methods in the system of professional and pedagogical training] In O.A. Dubasenyuk (Ed.), Profesiyna pedahohichna osvita: innovatsiyni tekhnolohiyi ta metodyky [Professional pedagogical education: innovative technologies and methods] (pp. 14-47). Publishing House of Zhytomyr State University named after I. Franko. http://eprints.zu.edu.ua/13363/1/Дубасенюк%20О.pdf

Dychkivska, I. M. (2004). Innovatsiyni pedahohichni tekhnolohiyi [Innovative pedagogical technologies]. Akademvydav. http://194.44.152.155/elib/local/r726.pdf

Giroux, H. (1999). Border Youth. Difference and Postmodern Education. In P. McLaren (Ed.), Critical Education in the New Information Age (pp. 93-115). Rowman and Littlefield.

Hurevych, R. S., Kademiya, M. Yu., & Umanets, V. O. (2018). Innovatsiyni tekhnolohiyi u zakladakh vyshchoyi osvity [Innovative technologies in higher education institutions]. In Suchasni informatsiyni tekhnolohiyi ta innovatsiyni metodyky navchannya u pidhotovtsi fakhivtsiv: metodolohiya, teoriya, dosvid, problemy [Modern information technologies and innovative teaching methods in training: methodology, theory, experience, problems], 51. Planer

Hytten, K. (1994). Pragmatism. Postmodernism and Education [Conference presentation]. American Educational Studies Association Annual Meeting Chapel Hill, North Carolina, November 13th, 1994. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED378181.pdf

Ivanova, S. V., & Elkina, I. M. (2016). Postmodernizm i kachestvo obrazovaniya (postanovka problemy) [Postmodernism and the quality of education (problem statement)]. Tsennosti i smysly [Values and meanings], 1, 6(46), 115-124.

Jacobs, K. D., & Kritsonis, W. A. (2006). National Strategies for Implementing Postmodern Thinking for Improving Secondary Education in Public Education in the United States of America. National Forum of Educational Administration and Suspervision Journal, 23(4), 1-10. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED492157.pdf

Martynets, L. A. (2015). Suchasni modeli osvity [Modern models of education]. Donetsk.

Milova, O. E. (2009). Tendentsiyi postmodernizmu v pedahohichniy teoriyi ta praktytsi SSHA (60 – 90-ti 01 – zahalʹna pedahohika ta istoriya pedahohiky. – Luhansʹk,XX stolittya) [Trends of postmodernism in the pedagogical theory and practice of the USA (60 - 90 01 - general pedagogics and history of pedagogics. - Luhansk, XX century)] [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Poltava National Technical University named after Yuri Kondratyuk.

Nerubasska, A., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). The Demarkation of Creativity, Talent and Genius in Humans: a Systemic Aspect. Postmodern Openings, 11(2), 240-255. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2/172

Nerubasska, A., Palshkov, K., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). A Systemic Philosophical Analysis of the Contemporary Society and the Human: New Potential. Postmodern Openings, 11(4), 275-292. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.4/235

Sá, M. J., & Serpa, S. (2018). Transversal Competences: Their Importance and Learning Processes by Higher Education Students. Education Sciences 8(3), 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030126

Downloads

Published

2022-03-14

How to Cite

Haidamaka, O., Kolisnyk-Humeniuk, Y., Storizhko, L., Marchenko, T., Poluboiaryna, I., & Bilova, N. (2022). Innovative Teaching Technologies in Postmodern Education: Foreign and Domestic Experience. Postmodern Openings, 13(1 Sup1), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/13.1Sup1/419

Issue

Section

Theoretical articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)