Study of Gender Conceptual Sphere: Historiography of the Question
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.3/325Keywords:
women's research, universalized man experience, positions of women's experience, the root and applications of the concept, unstable (mobile) structureAbstract
The article attempts to analyze the concept of gender, study philosophical preconditions of its emergence and trace the main postmodern aspects of the gender category. It proves that gender research in the postmodern era is not identical to the theories of feminism. It deals with social life of both sexes, their behavior, roles, characteristics, common and different between them, the social relationships of the sexes, considering the world from the standpoint of both socio-gender groups. The article shows that an urgent need for more purposeful development of independent women's research in the developing countries. Such research should holistically reflect and study the lives of women on the basis of the so-called women's rather than universalized man experience. The main idea of this scientific research was to emphasize that the world can be explored not only from a man perspective, but also from the standpoint of woman experience. The level of scientific study of the gender conceptual sphere is clarified, in particular, the gender concept is a multidimensional complex represented in the language, which has a certain ethnocultural specificity. The concept has an unstable structure, which is reflected in the model of the concept developed by us, in which we highlight the root and applications of the concept, the possible movement of features in the relevant semantic directions from and to the root. The unstable (mobile) structure of the concept is also characteristic of its root: during historical development, the root may change, but the semantic meaning is not lost, but only replaced by synonyms or verbal innovations relevant to today.
References
Ageeva, V. P., Kobelyanska, L. S., & Skoryk, M. M. (2004). Osnovy teoriyi henderu [Fundamentals of gender theory]. К. І. S.
Ageeva, V. (2003). Zhinochyy prostir: feministychnyy dyskurs ukrayinskoho modernizmu [Women’s space: feminist discourse of Ukrainian modernism]. Fact.
Baudrillard, J. (2000). Zabyt Fuko [To forget Foucault]. Vladimir Dal.
Bogaerts, J., & Carpentier, N. (2013). The postmodern challenge to journalism: strategies for constructing a trustworthy identity. In C. Peters, & M. Broersma (Eds.), Rethinking Journalism Again (pp. 60–72). London: Routledge.
Braidotti, P. (2000). Putem nomadizma [By nomadism]. Retrieved from https://www.livelib.ru/work/1002396615/about-putem-nomadizma-rozi-brajdotti#content
Darmanto, N., & Delliana, S. (2017). Citizen journalism as postmodern journalism. Publipreneur Polimedia: Jurnal Ilmiah Jurusan Penerbitan Politeknik Negeri Media KreaTIF, 5(1), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.46961/jip.v5i1.60
Deleuze, J. (1998). Razlichiye i povtoreniye [Difference and Repetition]. Petropolis.
Foucault, M. (1971). Nitsshe, genealogiya, istoriya [Nietzsche, genealogy, history]. In A. Usmanova (Ed.), Filosofiya epokhi postmoderna: sbornik perevodov i referatov [Philosophy of the Postmodern Era: the Collection of Translations and Abstracts] (pp. 74-97). Krasiko-print.
Frunza, M., Iulia, G., & Frunza, S. (2016). Ethical aspects of gender stereotypes in Romanian advertising. ESSACHESS - Journal for Communication Studies, 9(1), 143-157. https://www.essachess.com/index.php/jcs/article/view/328
Gapon, N. (2002). Hender u humanitarnomu dyskursi: filosofsko-psykholohichnyy analiz [Gender in the humanities discourse: philosophical and psychological analysis]. Litopys.
Gerasymova, I., Maksymchuk, B., Bilozerova, M., Chernetska, Y., Matviichuk, T., Solovyov, V., Maksymchuk, I. (2019). Forming Professional Mobility in Future Agricultural Specialists: the Sociohistorical Context. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 11(4 Suppl. 1), 345-361. http://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/195
Greyson, D. L., Becu, A. R., & Morgan, S. G. (2010). Sex, drugs and gender roles: mapping the use of sex and gender based analysis in pharmaceutical policy research. International Journal for Equity in Health, 19, 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-9-26
Heidegger, M. (2001). Sein und Zeit [Being and time]. Niemeyer.
Husserl, E. (1994). Filosofiya kak strogaya nauka [Philosophy as a strict science]. Saguna.
Jung, J., & Lennon, S. J. (2003). Body image, appearance self-shema, and media images. Family and Consumer Sciences. Research Journal, 32(1), 27-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X03255900
Kamenska, O. L. (2002) Gendergetika – nauka budushchego [Gendergetics is the science of the future]. In D. A. Dobrovolskiy, & A. V. Kirilina (Eds.), Gender kak intriga poznaniya [Gender as the Intrigue of Cognition] (pp. 13–19). Rudomino.
Melnyk, T. M. (1999). Henderna polityka v Ukrayini [Gender policy in Ukraine]. Aconite.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1999). Fenomenologiya vospriyatiya [Phenomenology of Perception]. Nauka.
Nerubasska, A., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). The demarkation of creativity, talent and genius in humans: a systemic aspect. Postmodern Openings, 11(2), 240-255. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2/172
Onishchuk, I., Ikonnikova, M., Antonenko, T., Kharchenko, I., Shestakova, S., Kuzmenko, N., & Maksymchuk, B. (2020). Characteristics of foreign language education in foreign countries and ways of applying foreign experience in pedagogical universities of Ukraine. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(3), 44-65. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.3/308
Rosenbury, L. A. (2019). Chapter 7: Postmodern feminist legal theory. In R. West, & C. G. Bowman (Eds.), Research Handbook on Feminist Jurisprudence (pp. 127–137). Elgar Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786439697.00015
Sartre, J.-P. (2000). Bytiye i nichto: opyt fenomenologicheskoy ontologii [Being and nothing: the experience of phenomenological ontology]. Respublika.
Sheremet, M., Leniv, Z., Loboda, V., & Maksymchuk, B. (2019). The development level of smart information criterion for specialists’ readiness for inclusion implementation in education. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 72(4), 273-285. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v72i4.2561
Trifonas, P. (2003). The ethics of science and/as research: deconstruction and the orientations of a new academic responsibility. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35(3), 285–295. http://doi.org/10.1111/1469-5812.00028
Vlasova, O. P., & Makieshyna, Y. V. (2018). Transformation of the gender dichotomy of spirit and body in postmodern philosophy and culture. Antropolohichni vymiry filosofskykh doslidzhen [Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research], 14, 107–118. https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr.v0i14.150751
Zosuls, K. M., Miller, C. F., Ruble, D. N., Martin, C. L., & Fabes, R. A. (2011). Gender development research in sex roles: historical trends and future directions. Sex Roles, 64(11-12), 826–842. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9902-3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
