Pedagogical Conditions of Organizational Culture Formation of Future Border Guard Officers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.1Sup1/273Keywords:
organizational culture, border guard officer, pedagogical conditions, experimentAbstract
The article presents the study of the effectiveness of pedagogical conditions of organizational culture formation of future border guard officers, as well as the essence and features of its content. It has been found out that organizational culture is a professionally important quality of future border guard officers, which covers knowledge about the mission and values of the border guard agency, ability to maintain and contribute to the harmonized work of the border guard unit and is expressed through adhering to professional standards in interpersonal interaction and in performing border security tasks, as well as in self-organization and mobilization. In the conditions of higher military educational institution it is recommended to intensify the value-motivational attitude of cadets to learn current issues of organizational culture of the border guard officers; to develop their abilities and skills of team work by introduction of social and psychological training; to apply modern dialogic forms, methods and interactive technologies of training for the development of skills of professional communicative interaction; to develop cadets’ organizational abilities, managerial decision making skills and leadership by gradually introducing into the educational process professionally oriented situational tasks, gradually complicating content with each course. The results of the pedagogical experiment regarding formation of organizational culture of future border guard officers in the course of their professional training are described in detail.
References
Alvesson, М. (2005). Organizatsionnaya kultura [Organizational culture]. Gumanitarnyj Centr.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, М. (1991). Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. London; New York: McGraw-Hill.
Schein, E. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. https://agustinazubair.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/13-organizational_culture_and_leadership_3rd_edition-p-4581.pdf
Scott, L. (1985). Postmodernity and desire. Theory and Society, 14, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00160926
Gergen, K. (1992). Organization theory in the postmodem era. In M. Reed & M. Hughes (Eds.), Rethinking Organizations: new directions in organization theory and analysis (pp. 207–226), London, UK: Sage.
Tabrizi, S., & Rideout, G. (2016). Styles of educational leadership for modernist and postmodernist approaches. International Journal for Infonomics, 9 (4), 1239-1246. https://doi.org/10.20533/iji.1742.4712.2016.0152
Tkhu Chang To (2014). Issledovanie organizatsionnoi kultury: metodologiia kolichestvennoi otsenki i analiza [The research of organizational culture: methodology of quantitative evaluation and analysis]. Statistika i ekonomika, 2, 130-133. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/issledovanie-organizatsionnoy-kultury-metodologiya-kolichestvennoy-otsenki-i-analiza/viewer
Bayanova, A., Vodenko, K., Sizova, Z., Chistyakov, A., Prokopyev, A., & Vasbieva, D. (2019). A philosophical view of organizational culture policy in contemporary universities. European Journal of Science and Theology, 15 (3), 121-131. http://www.ejst.tuiasi.ro/Files/76/11_Bayanova%20et%20al.pdf
Keough, T., & Tobin, B. (2001). Postmodern leadership and the policy lexicon: From theory, proxy to practice. Paper presented at the The Pan-Canadian Education Research Agenda Symposium Teacher Education/Educator Training: Current Trends and Future Directions, Quebec City. https://tarjomefa.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/9099-English-TarjomeFa.pdf
Sorensen, J. (2009). Note on Organizational Culture. Stanford Graduate School of Business, Case OB-69.
Cameron, K., & Quinn, R. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Shapovalova, I. (2009). Modelirovaniye organizatsionnoy kultury [Modeling organizational culture]. Belgorod: Publishing house of BSU.
Avilova, Z., Gulei, I., & Shavyrina, I. (2015). Formation of the Customer-Centric Organizational Culture of the University as a Factor of Effective Social and Economic Development of the Region. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. Doi: 10.5901/Mjss.2015.V6n3s5p207
Wahyuningsih, S., Sudiro, A., Troena, A., & Irawanto, D. (2019). Analysis of organizational culture with Denison’s model approach for international business competitiveness. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17 (1), 142-151. Doi: 10.21511/ppm.17(1).2019.13
Wu, J. (2008). A general behavior model and new definitions of organizational cultures. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37 (6), 2535-2545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2007.10.002
Soroka, O., Kalaur, S., & Balendr, A. (2019). Diagnostics of leadership qualities of specialists of «man-man» type of professions in military and civil higher education institutions: Psychological and pedagogical approach. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 11 (4S1), 264-277. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/189
Harris, P., Moran, R., & Moran, S. (2007). Managing cultural differences: Global leadership strategies for the 21st century (7th ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann
Soroka, O., Kalaur, S., & Balendr, A. (2020). Monitoring of Corporate Culture Formation of Specialists of Social Institutions. Postmodern Openings/Deschideri Postmoderne, 11. Doi: 10.18662/PO/11.1SUP1/131
Karamushka, L. (Ed.). (2005). Tekhnolohiyi roboty orhanizatsiynikh psykholohiv [Technologies of organizational psychologists' work]. Kyiv: Firma «INKOS».
Parker, G., & Kropp, R. (2001). Team Workout: A Trainer's Sourcebook of 50 Team-Building Games and Activities. New York: AMACOM.
Fopel, K. (2003). Sozdanie komandy. Psikhologicheskie igry i uprazhneniia [Team building. Psychological games and exercises] (M. Iankov, Trans.). Moscow: Genezis.
Balendr, A., Komarnytska, O., Bloshchynskyi, I., & Didenko, O. (2018). Informatsiino-komunikatsiini tekhnolohii v inshomovnii pidhotovtsi fakhivtsiv z okhorony kordonu krain Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu [Information and communication technologies in foreign languages training of the border guards in the European Union Countries]. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 67 (5), 56-71. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v67i5.2305
Handy, C. (1998). Beyond Certainty: The changing worlds of organization. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Postmodern Openings Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
