The Modern State and “Death of god”: Absurdity and Chaos in Ibuse’s Black Rain
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenss/11.1/63Keywords:
Black Rain, Friedrich Nietzsche, The Death of God, PostmodernismAbstract
The birth of modern state with her technological advancements was hailed as a new dawn for humankind. The merits of enlightenment had finally been realized and the ensuing scientific inventions would finally perpetuate the entry of humanity towards a universal culture. The problems such as disease, ignorance and poverty that had perennially affected humanity would be forgotten given that science and industrialization had heightened human reason and production. In spite of this grand narrative, emerging voices have singled out the failures of modernism and the narrative project. They have decried modernist tendencies to mechanize humanity and eradicate the individual’s creativity and morality. Through coercion and conformity, the modern state replaces individual revaluation of culture and perpetuates violence and intellectual passivity hence the demise of progress. This article is a postmodernist critique of modernism and her grand narrative with reference to Ibuse (1970), Black Rain. It shows how the ideals of modernism can only lead humanity to inhumanity, violence and chaos. The ideas of Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger will form a theoretical basis of interpretation. This is an analytical study that proceeds through close textual reading of primary and secondary texts.
References
Crow, C. (1942). Japan's dream of world empire: the Tanaka memorial. Harper Brothers.
Dar-Khalil, A. K., & Alshetawi, M. F. (2020). What the Survivors are Telling: Nuclear Trauma and Narratives of Toxicity in Japan. International Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Science, 8(11), 41-50. https://ijlass.org/articles/8.11.5.41-50.pdf
Gatewood, W. B. (1992). Theodore Roosevelt and the Shaping of the Modern Presidency [Review of The Presidency of Theodore Roosevelt., by L. L. Gould]. Reviews in American History, 20(4), 512–517. https://doi.org/10.2307/2702868
Hawley, R., & Turner, W. (1994). Nuclear power: the environmental benefits. Energy & Environment, 5(2), 95–103. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43734218
Heidegger, M. (1954). The Question Concerning Technology. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, pp.3-35. Garland Publishing Inc.
Hore-Lacy, I. (2007). History of Nuclear Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012373622-2/5001
Ibuse, M. (1969). Black Rain. Kodansha International.
Jerrold, M. (2002). Killing in the Name of God. Air University.
Kamanzi, A. (2011). Modernity: foundation for universal environmental degradation. Journal of the College of Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(3), 204 – 213. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261548678_
Modernity_Foundation_for_Universal_Environmental_Degradation
Livingstone, S. (2008). Seminar Introductions: Setting the Scene. Theorising the benefits of new technology for youth: Controversies of learning and development, 5-19. ESRC. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33821/1/Theorising_the_benefits_of_new_technology_for_youth.pdf.
Nietzsche, F. (2013) The Friedrich Nietzsche’s Collection: 22 Classic Works. Works Keep Publishing.
Rorty, R. (1992). Human Rights, Rationality and Sentimentality. In Shute and Hurley (Eds.). On Human Rights. Basic Books, pp 112-134.
Rufus E. M. (1985). Hiroshima: The Strange Myth of Half a Million American Lives Saved. International Security, 10(2), 121-140. https://doi.org/10.2307/2538830
Selwyne, N. (2008). Developing the technological imagination: theorising the social shaping and consequences of new technologies. Theorising the benefits of new technology for youth: Controversies of learning and development, 19-29. ESRC. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33821/1/Theorising_the_benefits_of_new_technology_for_youth.pdf
Schulz, M. (2006). Nuclear Power is the Future. The Wilson Quarterly, 30(4), 59-63. http://econ2.econ.iastate.edu/faculty/bhattacharya/102H/nuclear2.pdf
Swan, L. W. (1996). Japan’s Intentions for its Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere as indicated in Its Policy Plans for Thailand. Journal of South East Asian Studies, 27(1), 139-149. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20071764.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
LUMEN SS Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
