The Divorce and It’s Psycho-Social Impact on the Couple

Authors

  • Iulian Apostu PhD, Scientific Researcher, Institute of Sociology, Romanian Academy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenss/9.2/43

Keywords:

divorce, family, functionality, conflict, mediation

Abstract

The image of divorce in Romania is very much dependent on stereotypes that consistently distort the real situation of Romanian families. Thus, the most common stereotype, unfortunately, in some scientific publications, is that of marital disaster generated by the high divorce rate and the accelerated growth rate. A second problem is the acceptance of the condition of being divorced, because within social mentality divorce is still seen as a negative statute, through which an individual is appreciated. Beyond the objective reality of divorce indicators in Romania, that show stability and low values ​​of divorce in the last 3 decades, the issue of mentalities regarding divorce and the image of divorcees still needs updating. For Romania, the difficulty of deciding to get a divorce also depends on the social context, on the legitimacy of the action at the level of the extended family group and, at the same time, on the assumption of a certain social image of the divorced individual. The study aims to analyze the functional changes of individuals separated by divorce and to highlight the new challenges of functional reorganization. The paper is based on the functionalist theory (Talcott Parsons and Robert K. Merton) and proposes a type of qualitative research with the help of a semi-structured interview.

References

Apostu, I. (2015). Căsătoria între stabilitate şi disoluţie [The marriage between stability and dissolution]. Tritonic.

Cătărău, L. F. (2019). Evaluarea impactului migraţiei părinţilor asupra comportamentului infracţional al copiilor rămaşi acasă [Assessing the impact of parental migration on the criminal behavior of children left at home]. Lumen.

Cetean Voiculescu, L. (2019). Dreptul familiei şi actele de stare civilă. Note de curs şi manual de seminar [Family law and civil status documents. Course notes and seminar textbook]. Lumen.

Giddens, A. (1997). Transformarea intimităţii.Manual sexual pentru elite [Transformation of intimacy. Sexual manual for elites ]. Antet.

Grümberg, L., Rusu, A., & Samoilă E. (2019). Barometrul de gen: România 2018 [Gender barometer: Romania 2018]. Hecate.

Iluţ, P. (2005). Sociopsihologia şi antropologia familiei [Sociopsychology and family anthropology]. Polirom.

Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. The Free Press.

National Institute of Statistics of Romania, Tempo online database. http://statistici.insse.ro:8077/tempo-online/#/pages/tables/insse-table

Parsons, T. (1967). Sociological theory and modern society. Free Press.

Romanian Parliament. (1953). Legea nr. 4/1953 (Codul Familiei), republicată prin Legea nr. 4/1956, cu modificările aduse prin Decretul nr. 779/1966 [Law no. 4/1953 (Family Code), republished by Law no. 4/1956, with the amendments brought by Decree no. 779/1966]. http://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument Afis/20281

Sandu, A., Huidu, A., & Furnză, A. (2020). Social perception of ethical values in the Romanian post-secular society. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 19(55), 105-120. http://jsri.ro/ojs/index.php/jsri/article/view/1187

Zimbardo, P., & Coulombe, D. N. (2020). Masculinitatea furată [Stolen masculinity]. Trei.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-05

How to Cite

Apostu, I. (2021). The Divorce and It’s Psycho-Social Impact on the Couple. Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Social Sciences, 9(2), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenss/9.2/43