„Jus” (Law) and „Justitia” (Justice) in Roman Solicitors’ Perception and Definition. Reflections and Evaluations

Authors

  • Nicolae Dura Ovidius University of Constanta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenlaw/26

Keywords:

Fontes juris romanum, the philosophy of Roman law, Roman solicitors, Romanian legal thinking

Abstract

In the Romanian specialized literature the two notions, „Jus” (Law) and „Justitia” (Justice), are commonly used and explained only from the contemporary legal expert’s perspective, who - more often than not - does not always prove to be familiarized with not just „Jus romanum antiquum” (Old Roman law), and, ipso facto, the thinking of the famous Roman solicitors, but also with the history and philosophy of Roman Law. For this reason, in the pages of my paper I searched that, by presenting some relevant aspects of its content, to offer to its readers the possibility of revisiting the text of the „Old Roman law” (Jus romanum antiquum), and “ipso facto”, to underline also the mode in which this Law was perceived and received in the landscape of Romanian legal thinking. Consequently, with the intention of making a clarifying contribution regarding the evolutionary process of the ideational content of the two notions, “Jus” and “Justitia”, in the pages of our study, with an interdisciplinary character, we have brought the reader, volens-nolens, „ad fontes”, that is to the sources of the Roman Law, in which we could find out not only their content and subjects, but also the definitions of the Roman solicitors about „Jus” and „Justitia”.

References

Academia Română. (1998). Dicționar explicativ al Limbii române (DEX) [Explanatory Dictionary of the Romanian language] (2nd ed.). Bucharest, Romania: Univers Enciclopedic.

Dură, N. V. (2003). Dreptul şi religia. Norme juridice şi norme religios-morale [Law and religion. Legal and religious-moral norms]. Analele Universităţii Ovidius. Seria: Drept şi Ştiinţe Administrative, 1, 15-24.

Dură, N. V. (2004). Ideea de drept. „Dreptul”, „dreptatea” şi „morala” [The idea of Law. "Law", "justice" and "morality"]. Analele Universităţii Ovidius. Seria: Drept şi Ştiinţe Administrative, I, 15-46.

Dură, N. V. (2007). Dreptul canonic, disciplină de studiu în Facultăţile de Drept din prestigioase Universităţi europene [Canon Law, a discipline in the Faculties of Law of prestigious European Universities]. Analele Universităţii Ovidius. Seria: Drept şi Ştiinţe Administrative, 1, 328-332.

Dură, N. V. (2011a). Law and morals. Prolegomena (I). Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica, 2, 158-173.

Dură, N. V. (2011b). Law and morals. Prolegomena (II). Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica, 3, 72-84.

Dură, N. V. (2011c). Thinking of some fathers of the Ecumenical Church on the law. Christian Researches, VI, 230-245.

Dură, N. V. (2013). Loi morale, naturelle, source du Droit naturel et de la Morale chrétienne. La morale au crible des religions. Studia Arabica, XXI, 213-233.

Dură, N. V. (2014). Despre „Jus naturale”. Contribuţii filosofico-juridice [On "Jus naturale". Philosophical-legal contributions]. Revista de Teologie Sfântul Apostol Andrei, XVIII(1), 39-52.

Dură, N. V. (2015). “Justitia” and “aequitas” in the perception of the Greek philosophers and of the Roman jurists. Teologia Młodych, 4, 4-9.

Floca, I. N. (1990). Drept canonic ortodox. Legislație și administrație bisericească [Orthodox canon law. Church legislation and administration]. Bucharest, Romania: Editura Institutului Biblic.

Gaius. Institutiones [Instituţiile]. Bucharest, Romania: Editura Academiei RSR.

Guțu, G. (1983). Dicționar latin-român [Latin-Romanian dictionary]. Bucharest, Romania: Științifică și Enciclopedică.

Justinian. (n.d.). Digestae. LB. I, 1, 1-7. Retrieved from https://droitromain.univgrenoble-alpes.fr/Corpus/digest.htm

Justiniani Institutiones. (2002). Bucharest, Romania: Lumina Lex.

Mititelu, C. (2010). Elements of penal law in the Romanian Nomocanons printed in the 17th century. Dionysiana, 1, 419-430.

Mititelu, C. (2012). Pravilele româneşti, tipărite, din secolul al XVII-lea. Infracţiuni şi pedepse [Romanian Code of Laws, printed, from the 17th century. Offenses and penalties]. Bucharest, Romania: Didactică şi Pedagogică.

Mititelu, C. (2014a). The Byzantine law and its reception in the Romanian Principalities. Philosophical-Theological Reviewer, 4, 33-43.

Mititelu, C. (2014b). The Nomocanons (Code of Laws) printed in the Romanian countries, in the Seventeenth Century, and their provisions of criminal law. Religion, 3, 41-57.

Mititelu, C. (2016). The legislation of emperor Justinian (527-565) and its reception in the Carpathian-Danubian-Pontic space. Analecta Cracoviensia, 48, 383-397. doi:10.15633/acr.2033

Pereterskii, I. S. (1958). Digestele lui Justinian [Justinian’s Digestae]. Bucharest, Romania: Științifică.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-30

How to Cite

Dura, N. (2019). „Jus” (Law) and „Justitia” (Justice) in Roman Solicitors’ Perception and Definition. Reflections and Evaluations. Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Law, 7(2), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenlaw/26