„Jus” (Law) and „Justitia” (Justice) in Roman Solicitors’ Perception and Definition. Reflections and Evaluations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenlaw/26Keywords:
Fontes juris romanum, the philosophy of Roman law, Roman solicitors, Romanian legal thinkingAbstract
In the Romanian specialized literature the two notions, „Jus” (Law) and „Justitia” (Justice), are commonly used and explained only from the contemporary legal expert’s perspective, who - more often than not - does not always prove to be familiarized with not just „Jus romanum antiquum” (Old Roman law), and, ipso facto, the thinking of the famous Roman solicitors, but also with the history and philosophy of Roman Law. For this reason, in the pages of my paper I searched that, by presenting some relevant aspects of its content, to offer to its readers the possibility of revisiting the text of the „Old Roman law” (Jus romanum antiquum), and “ipso facto”, to underline also the mode in which this Law was perceived and received in the landscape of Romanian legal thinking. Consequently, with the intention of making a clarifying contribution regarding the evolutionary process of the ideational content of the two notions, “Jus” and “Justitia”, in the pages of our study, with an interdisciplinary character, we have brought the reader, volens-nolens, „ad fontes”, that is to the sources of the Roman Law, in which we could find out not only their content and subjects, but also the definitions of the Roman solicitors about „Jus” and „Justitia”.References
Academia Română. (1998). Dicționar explicativ al Limbii române (DEX) [Explanatory Dictionary of the Romanian language] (2nd ed.). Bucharest, Romania: Univers Enciclopedic.
Dură, N. V. (2003). Dreptul şi religia. Norme juridice şi norme religios-morale [Law and religion. Legal and religious-moral norms]. Analele Universităţii Ovidius. Seria: Drept şi Ştiinţe Administrative, 1, 15-24.
Dură, N. V. (2004). Ideea de drept. „Dreptul”, „dreptatea” şi „morala” [The idea of Law. "Law", "justice" and "morality"]. Analele Universităţii Ovidius. Seria: Drept şi Ştiinţe Administrative, I, 15-46.
Dură, N. V. (2007). Dreptul canonic, disciplină de studiu în Facultăţile de Drept din prestigioase Universităţi europene [Canon Law, a discipline in the Faculties of Law of prestigious European Universities]. Analele Universităţii Ovidius. Seria: Drept şi Ştiinţe Administrative, 1, 328-332.
Dură, N. V. (2011a). Law and morals. Prolegomena (I). Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica, 2, 158-173.
Dură, N. V. (2011b). Law and morals. Prolegomena (II). Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica, 3, 72-84.
Dură, N. V. (2011c). Thinking of some fathers of the Ecumenical Church on the law. Christian Researches, VI, 230-245.
Dură, N. V. (2013). Loi morale, naturelle, source du Droit naturel et de la Morale chrétienne. La morale au crible des religions. Studia Arabica, XXI, 213-233.
Dură, N. V. (2014). Despre „Jus naturale”. Contribuţii filosofico-juridice [On "Jus naturale". Philosophical-legal contributions]. Revista de Teologie Sfântul Apostol Andrei, XVIII(1), 39-52.
Dură, N. V. (2015). “Justitia” and “aequitas” in the perception of the Greek philosophers and of the Roman jurists. Teologia Młodych, 4, 4-9.
Floca, I. N. (1990). Drept canonic ortodox. Legislație și administrație bisericească [Orthodox canon law. Church legislation and administration]. Bucharest, Romania: Editura Institutului Biblic.
Gaius. Institutiones [Instituţiile]. Bucharest, Romania: Editura Academiei RSR.
Guțu, G. (1983). Dicționar latin-român [Latin-Romanian dictionary]. Bucharest, Romania: Științifică și Enciclopedică.
Justinian. (n.d.). Digestae. LB. I, 1, 1-7. Retrieved from https://droitromain.univgrenoble-alpes.fr/Corpus/digest.htm
Justiniani Institutiones. (2002). Bucharest, Romania: Lumina Lex.
Mititelu, C. (2010). Elements of penal law in the Romanian Nomocanons printed in the 17th century. Dionysiana, 1, 419-430.
Mititelu, C. (2012). Pravilele româneşti, tipărite, din secolul al XVII-lea. Infracţiuni şi pedepse [Romanian Code of Laws, printed, from the 17th century. Offenses and penalties]. Bucharest, Romania: Didactică şi Pedagogică.
Mititelu, C. (2014a). The Byzantine law and its reception in the Romanian Principalities. Philosophical-Theological Reviewer, 4, 33-43.
Mititelu, C. (2014b). The Nomocanons (Code of Laws) printed in the Romanian countries, in the Seventeenth Century, and their provisions of criminal law. Religion, 3, 41-57.
Mititelu, C. (2016). The legislation of emperor Justinian (527-565) and its reception in the Carpathian-Danubian-Pontic space. Analecta Cracoviensia, 48, 383-397. doi:10.15633/acr.2033
Pereterskii, I. S. (1958). Digestele lui Justinian [Justinian’s Digestae]. Bucharest, Romania: Științifică.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
LUMEN Law Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND