Constructionist Grounded Theory -GT. Conceptual and Methodological Clarifications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/lumeneas/06Keywords:
Grounded Theory, qualitative research, social constructivism, interpretive model, data encoding.Abstract
In this article we aim to bring a series of epistemological and conceptual clarifications on a particular method of qualitative research entitled Grounded Theory (GT) in its social-constructive approach. The peculiarity of this research method is the exploratory character, the theoretical explanatory construction based on data gathered from the field and not from a series of assumptions taken from the literature, or built from the missing knowledge areas within it. The socio-constructivist dimension emphasizes the context dependence of the obtained results and the generated interpretative model.References
Brod, M., Tesler, L. E., & Christiansen, T. L. (2009). Qualitative research and content validity: Developing best practices based on science and experience. Quality of Life Research, 18(9), 1263-1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9
Caras, A. & Sandu, A. (2014). The Role of Supervision in Professional Development of Social Work Specialists. Journal of Social Work Practice: Psychotherapeutic Approaches in Health, Welfare and the Community, 28(1), 75-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2012.763024.
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. Denzin, Y & Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Second edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Charmaz, K. (2002). Constructing Grounded Theory, 2nd edition. London: Sage Publications.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
Cheer, K., MacLaren, D., & Tsey, K. (2015). The use of grounded theory in studies of nurses and midwives' coping processes: A systematic literature search. Contemporary Nurse, 51(2-3), 200-219.
Chelcea, S. (2007). Metodologia cercetării sociologice. Metode cantitative şi calitative, editia a treia. Bucureşti, România: Editura Economică.
Chen, H., & Boore, J. R. P. (2009). Using a synthesised technique for grounded theory in nursing research. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18(16), 22-51.
Cojocaru, D., Damian, R., Damian, S., Gavrilovici, O., Iliescu, L., Macarie, G., Necula, R., & Sandu, A. (2011). Stil de viaţă şi comportament în sănătate al persoanelor cu boli cronice. Cercetare în cadrul „Studii postdoctorale în domeniul eticii politicilor de sănătate‖, Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie Gr.T Popa Iaşi. POSDRU/89/1.5/S/61879.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A.L. (2006). Basics of qualitative research. 3 edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 3rd edition. California, SUA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Dey, I. (1999). Grounding Grounded Theory: Guidelines for Qualitative Inquiry. London: Academic Press.
Frunză, A. (2017). Supervizarea şi dezvoltarea profesională a asistenţilor sociali. Iaşi, România: Editura Lumen
Frunză, A., & Sandu, A. (2016a). On understanding the process of informed consent. În curs de evaluare la SAGE Open.
Frunză, A., & Sandu, A. (2016b). Is Informed Consent Well Understood in the Romanian Healthcare System? Nepublicat.
Funza, A., & Sandu, A. (2017). Values grounding the Informed Consent in Medical Practice. Theory and Practice. SAGE Open. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2158244017740397
Funză, A. (2017). Supervizarea şi dezvoltarea profesională a asistenţilor sociali. Iaşi, România: Editura Lumen. Glaser, B.G. (1992). Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G. (2001). The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted with Description. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business, and Market Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Guba, E.G. (1990). The alternative paradigm dialog. In Guba, E. (ed.), The Paradigm Dialog. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994), ―Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln, (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105-17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ioan, B.G., Hanganu, B., Velnic, A.A., Petre-Ciudin, V., Damian, S.I. (2017). When you seed violence you harvest violence-adolescent parricide. case presentation. Forensic Science International, 277(Sup. 1), 208-209.
Iluţ, P. (1997). Abordarea calitativă a socioumanului. Iaşi, România: Editura Polirom.
Keen, A. (2013). Saturation in qualitative research. Distinguishing between descriptive and theoretical saturation. Retrieved from https://my.rcn.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/511464/Resear ch2013Th39.pdf
Kelle, U. (2005). Emergence vs. forcing of empirical data? A crucial problem of grounded theory reconsidered. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung (Forum: Qualitative Social Research), 6(2), Art. 27. Retrieved from www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/ 467/1001.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Manuj, I., & Pohlen, T.L. (2012). A reviewer's guide to the grounded theory methodology in logistics and supply chain management research. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(8), 784-803. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031211269758
Manuj, I., & Sahin, F. (2011). A model of supply chain and supply chain decision-making complexity. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(5), 511-549.
Markey, K., Tilki, M., & Taylor, G. (2014). Reflecting on the challenges of choosing and using a grounded theory approach. Nurse Researcher, 22(2), 16-22. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.2.16.e1272
Mucchielli, A. (coord.), (2002). Dicţionar al metodelor calitative în ştiinţele umane şi sociale. Iaşi, România: Editura Polirom.
Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Leech, N.L., Slate, J.R., Stark, M., Sharma, B., Frels, R., Harris, K., & Combs, J.P. (2012). An Exemplar for Teaching and Learning Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 17(1), 16-77.
Rubin, H.J., & Rubin, I.S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Sandu, A. (2012). Metode de cercetare în ştiinţa comunicării. Iaşi, România: Editura Lumen. Sandu, A. (2013). The Social Construction of Autonomy and the Meanings of Autonomy for the Diabetic Patient from Doctor's Perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 2130–2135
Sandu, A. (2016a). Social Construction of Reality as communicative Action. UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Sandu, A. (2016b). Cadre normativ-instituţionale ale construcţiei sociale a profesiei de consilier de probaţiune în zona de N-E a României şi în Republica Moldova. Sociologie Românească, 14(1), 23-43.
Sandu, A. (2017). Construcţia socială a profesiei de consilier de probaţiune. Iasi, Romania: LUMEN Publishing House.
Sandu, A., Cojocaru, D., Gavrilovici, C., & Oprea. L. (2013). Trust: an Ethical Dimension of Healthcare in Chronic Disorders. Revista Română de Bioetică, 11(1), 190-205.
Sandu, A., Necula, R., Frunză, A., Unguru, E., & Damian, S. (2017). A qualitative inquiry in social construction of chronic illness Case study on diabetes mellitus. Doctors perspectives. Archive EuroMedica, 2(2017), 18-23.
Sandu, A., Unguru, E., Ponea, S., Cojocaru, Ş. (2010). Analysis of professional competencies in supervision field of social services. Social Research Reports, 17, 3-56.
Sbaraini, A., Carter, S.M., Evans, R.W., & Blinkhorn, A. (2011). How to do a grounded theory study: A worked example of a study of dental practices. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 128. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-128
Suddaby, R. (2006). From The Editors: What Grounded Theory Is Not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 633-642.
Traşă, L. (2010). Metode si tehnici de cercetare în psihologie, sinteză de curs. Universitatea Spiru Haret, Bucureşti.
Urquhart, C., Lehmann, H., & Myers, M.D. (2010). Putting the 'theory' back into grounded theory: Guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Information Systems Journal, 20(4), 357-381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00328.x
Xenofontov, I. (2011). Războiul sovieto-afghan (1979–1989). Studiu de istorie verbală. Percepţii. Documente. Iaşi, România: Editura Lumen.
http://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo/nvivo-products
Gibbs Graham R (2013) A Discussion with Prof Kathy Charmaz on Grounded Theory, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5AHmHQS6WQ Löfgren
Kent (2013) Qualitative analysis of interview data: A step-by-step guide, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRL4PF2u9XA
Curry Leslie (2015) Fundamentals of Qualitative Research Methods: Data Analysis (Module 5), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opp5tH4uD-w
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Antonio SANDU

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant this journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
LUMEN EAS Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND