The Right to Individual or Collective Self-Defense. Preventive Attack According to the Provisions of the UN Charter
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/jls/16.3-4/89Keywords:
individual self-defense, collective self-defense, provisions of the UN Charter, international relationsAbstract
Geo-political interests have always played a significant role in the ongoing struggle for power, supremacy and leadership, especially among the leading states such as the US, China, Russia, etc. Since the creation of the first social communities and, to this day, with progress, only the method of struggle has changed, not the purpose. As long as money, prosperity and the desire to dominate rule this world, as long as there is tension and competition between states. Therefore, in order not to go beyond the extremes of this confrontation, which can lead to disastrous consequences for humanity, it is necessary to have a proper organization of nations, where under the control of diplomacy and security, the interests of the state are protected. Thus, in compliance with the provisions based on the peaceful conduct of international relations, it is ensured the dignity and protection of the State, which in the event of an act of aggression on the part of another State, which is the guilty state. The collective union of states, in compliance with these provisions, is a guarantor of international security and peace. We try to discuss in this study the correct method of conducting the right of self-defense according to the provisions of the UN Charter, in case of an armed conflict, frequently encountered at present, taking into account the emphasis on the misinterpretation of the without the authorization of the United Nations, which appeared after the terrorist act of September 11, 2001, in the USA.
References
Аli-Sааb, G. (2002). The Proper Role of International Law in Combating Terrorism. Chinese Journal of International Law, 1(1), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cjilaw.a000424
Aniţei, N. (2011). Instituţii financiare internaţionale [International financial institutions]. Lumen Publishing House.
Apostu, I. (2021). Conflicting Resources in the Contemporary Couple. Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Social Sciences, 10(1), 30-38. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenss/10.1/55
Apostu, I. (2020). Self-Mediation in the Contemporary Couple. Eastern-European Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics, 4(1), 55-61. https://doi.org/10.18662/eejmhb/4.1/26
Byers, M. (2002). Terrorism, the Use of Force аnd Internаtionаl lаw аfter 11 September 2001. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 51(2), 401-414. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/51.2.401
Ciucă, A. (2018). Drept internaţional public [International public law]. Lumen Publishing House.
Florea, D. (2017). Drept internaţional public [International public law]. Lumen Publishing House.
Gray, Ch. (2008). International Law on the Use of Force (third Edition). Oxford University Press.
Kelsen, H. (1948). Collective Security and Collective Self-Defense Under the Charter of the United Nations. American Journal of International Law, 42(4), 783-796. https://doi.org/10.2307/2193350
Legal Information Institute .(n.d.). U.S. Code. Cornell Law School. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text
Kunz, J. (1947). Individual and Collective Self-Defense in Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations. American Journal of International Law, 41(4), 872-879. https://doi.org/10.2307/2193095
Naryshkin, S. E. (2015). The Coup D'etat in Kiev in February 2014 and International Law. Interview with Sergey Naryshkin, Chairman of the state Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. Eurasian Law Journal, 2(81). https://eurasialaw.ru/nashi-rubriki/persona-grata/intervyu-s-naryshkinym-sergeem-evgenevichem
Năstаse, A., & Aurescu, B. (2018). Drept internaţional public [Public International Law]. C.H. Beck Publishing House.
Onica-Jarka, B. (2016). Dreptul internaţional umanitar [International Humanitarian Law]. UJ Publishing House.
Rifааt, А. М. (1979). International aggression: A study of the legal concept: its development and definition in international law. Almqvist & Wiksell international.
Sandu, A. (2021). Identity changes in crisis situations. Anxiety, frustration and anguish due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii »Alexandru Ioan Cuza« din Iaşi. Sociologie şi Asistenţă Socială, 14(2), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.47743/asas-2021-2-653
Saul, B. (2012). Terrorism. Hart Publishing Ltd.
United Nations. (1945). United Nations Charter. San Francisco. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter
UN Security Council. (2001a). Resolution 1368 (2001) / adopted by the Security Council at its 4370th meeting, on 12 September 2001. Security Council. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/448051?ln=es
UN Security Council. (2001b). Resolution 1373 (2001) / adopted by the Security Council at its 4385th meeting, on 28 September 2001. Security Council. https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/blog/document/security-council-resolution-1373-2001-on-threats-to-international-peace-and-security-caused-by-terrorist-acts/
UN Security Council. (2001c). Resolution 1377 (2001) / adopted by the Security Council at its 4413th meeting, on 12 November 2001. Security Council. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/452238
UN Security Council. (2002a). Resolution 1438 (2002) / adopted by the Security Council at its 4624th meeting, on 14 October 2002. Security Council. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/475999?ln=es
UN Security Council. (2002b). Resolution 1440 (2002) / adopted by the Security Council at its 4632nd meeting, on 24 October 2002. Security Council. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/476994
UN Security Council. (2003). Resolution 1456 (2003) / adopted by the Security Council at its 4688nd meeting, on 20 January 2003. Security Council. http://unscr.com/en/resolutions/1456
UN Security Council. (2004). Security Council resolution 1535 (2004) [on the revitalization of the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1373 (2001) concerning counter-terrorism]. Security Council. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/518325
UN Security Council. (2005). Resolution 1611 (2005) / adopted by the Security Council at its 5223rd meeting, on 7 July 2005. Security Council. http://unscr.com/en/resolutions/1611
Winston, N., & Crаig, H. (2004). The New Bush National Security Doctrine аnd the Rule of Lаw. Berkeley Journal of International Lаw, 22, 375. https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/339/
Wаlzer, M. (1984). Spheres of Justice: a Defense of Pluralism and Equality. Basic Books.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 International Association of Law and Related Sciences, Iasi (Romania) & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
