THE JURIDICAL APPROACH OF TRUTH

Authors

  • Mihai LUPU Ph.d, Faculty of Law, București University; s.r. III, ”Gh. Zane” Institute of Economic and Social Research, The Romanian Academy – Iași Branch

Keywords:

Truth, relativism, law, justice, formalism.

Abstract

Finding the truth is considered by many people envolved in a lawsuit as the ideal of justice, beyond punishing those who are guilty for committing crimes, the obligation to recognize the subjective rights’ violation or the compensation for damages. In certain situations, a partial truth becomes similar to injustice. The legislators have turned the finding of truth into a fundamental principle of law, quite abstract in comparison to formal, direct norms, with provisions that require a minimum margin of interpretation. Taken in this formalism, law scholars, judges and lawyers, especially after a long period of time, may no longer relate to fundamental values, including the finding of truth. The compromised truth leads to a misapplication of the law and, implicitly, to a vicious court decision on litigation. One af the arised question is whether the legislator himself should be mindful of the truth in the law-making process. The approaches may be diverse: substantiation of norms, simplification of procedures, systematization of law towards the predictable and understandable solution to legal conflicts.

References

Alexe, C. E. (2008). Judecatorul în procesul civil, intre rol activ și arbitrar. Vol. 1. București: C.H. Beck.

Crisu, A. (2013). Drept procesual penal, Editia a 4-a revizuita si actualizata. Bucuresti, Romania: Editura Hamangiu. București, Romania: C.H. Beck.

Dima, T. (1981). Criteriologia adevarului, in vol. Adevaruri despre adevar, coord. Petre Botezatu, Iasi.

Kant, I. (1969). Critica rațiunii pure. București, Romania: Ed. Stiintifica.

Mateut, Gh. (2007). Tratat de procedura penala, Partea generală, vol. I,

Neagu, I., & Damaschin, M. (2015). Tratat de procedura penala, Editia a IIa, Bucuresti: Universul Juridic.

Rorty, R. (2000). Obiectivitate, relativism si adevar, Eseuri filosofice I, București, Romania. Editura Univers.

Suciu, Al. (1994). Adevar, fals, eroare, greseala. Revista de filosofie, ianuariefebruarie. Bucuresti, Romania: Editura Academiei Romane.

Vidam, T. (2005). Adevar, normativitate, justificare si crez, Revista de filosofie, Tomul LII, septembrie-decembrie. Bucuresti, Romania: Editura Academiei Romane.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-28

How to Cite

LUPU, M. (2018). THE JURIDICAL APPROACH OF TRUTH. Jurnalul De Studii Juridice, 13(3-4), 56-64. Retrieved from https://www.lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/jls/article/view/1287

Issue

Section

Law and Social Sciences