Organizational Performance Management at a Strategic Level. Advanced Systems and Tools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/jess/04Keywords:
strategic management, performance measurement, performance management systems, key performance indicators, critical success factors,Abstract
Measuring performance is a key element necessary for the operation of the performance management system serving to provide essential feedback to improve the substantiation of decisions within an organization, at all levels: strategic, operational or individual, and thus plays an important role in translating the entity's strategy into results. Performance management systems are formal systems, based in practice on information technology and on procedures used by managers to maintain or to change the structures that ensure the activities of the Organization to obtain better results. Promotion of advanced tools constitutes a real support for management: among the most relevant tools used in performance management, we can mention: strategic planning, enterprise risk management, change management, customer relationship management, knowledge management, quality management. Performance evaluation considers key performance indicators and success factors established by the Organization, which provide the referential in measuring performance. Performance measurement in the missions planned by the internal audit plays an important role in determining whether the objectives of the institutional strategy are met and whether they have materialized into concrete results.References
BAIN & COMPANY, http://www.bain.com
Dascălu, E.D. (2015). Exigences de l’evaluation des besoins pour le developpement institutionnel dans le secteur public. Revue Valaque d’Etudes economique, RVEE, 6(2), pag. 79-88.
Dascălu, E.D., & Nasta, L. (2015). Managerial Accountability - a Key Factor in the Implementation of International Control System. Analele Universităţii Ovidius, Seria Ştiinţe Economice, XV(2), pp. 229-235. http://www.rvee.eu/images/2015/no2/9.rvee_dascalu.pdf)
Dascălu, E.D., Marcu, N., & Hurjui, I. (2016). Managementul si monitorizarea performantei în auditul intern pentru sectorul public din România. Amfiteatru Economic, 18(43), pag.460-475. http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/ArticolRO.aspx?CodArticol=25 52)
Folan, P., Browne, J., & Jagdev, H. (2007). Performance: Its meaning and content for today's business research. Computers in Industry, 58(7), pp.605-620.
Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D.P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard: Measures That Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 199, pp. 71-79.
Ordinul Secretarului general al Guvernului nr. 400/2015 pentru aprobarea Codului controlului intern managerial al entităţilor publice, Monitorul Oficial, Partea I, nr. 444 din 22.06.2015
The EFQM Excellence Model, http://www.efqm.org/the-efqm-excellence-model The KPI Institute, http://www.smartKPIs.com
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Journal for Ethics in Social Studies.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
