Autonomy and Responsibility of the Researcher in Research on Human Subjects

Authors

  • Maria Iuliana Costeniuc MA, Faculty of Law and Administrative Sciences, „Stefan cel Mare” University of Suceava, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/eejmhb.16

Keywords:

autonomy, responsibility, research ethics, ethical researcher

Abstract

When discussing the issues of human relations and behaviour in society, I visualize a society that is guided by rules or rules, which, once violated, trigger the legal responsibility of the individual. In addition, there are moral concepts that are not related to the law, for example ethics, which deals with the study of moral principles. The topic of this article addresses the autonomy and responsibility of the researcher in research on human subject, starting from historical cases in the ethics development – Nuremberg Code or Tuskegee Study. An important aspect to know about research on human subjects is the "Nuremberg Code", which raised the issue of the extraordinary abuses of Nazi doctors who were doing experiments on prisoners, without their will. These scientific experiments were called "crimes against humanity" and were tried at the Nuremberg Tribune. Consequently, for good moral conduct, this code was adopted, which introduced consent, the right of the person to withdraw without being sanctioned regardless of the time of the experiment and the risk-benefit analysis. Therefore, the rules that are in force today regarding research on human subjects reflect the reaction of an international community on those immoral medical experiments

References

Rotaru, T.S., Gavrilovici, C. (2015). Cercetarea biomedicală şi etica cercetării [Biomedical research and research ethics], Iaşi, Romania: Pro Universitaria.

Colegiul Medicilor din România (2016). Code of Medical Ethics. Retrieved from https://www.cmr.ro/new/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Code-ofMedical-Ethics.pdf

Departamentul de cercetare managementul proiectelor inovare si transfer tehnologic [Research department for management of innovation projects and technological transfer](2015). Codul de etică în cercetarea ştiinţifică în universitatea din Petroşani [Code of ethics in scientific research at the University of Petrosani] (pp.1-11). retrieved from https://www.upet.ro/cercetare/doc/ETICA%20IN%20CERCETARE.pdf

Socaciu, E., Vică,C., Mihailov, E., Gibea, T., Mureşan, V., Constantinescu, M. (2018). Etică şi integritate academică [Ethics and Academic Integrity]. Bucuresti, Romania: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti

Leabu, M. (2018). Bioetica: istoric şi semnificaţie[Bioethics: history and significance]. In A. Sandu, B. Popoveniuc (eds.) Etică şi integritate în educaţie şi cercetare [Ethics and integrity in education and Research] (pp.133-155). Bucureşti, Romania: Tritonic.

Sandu, A. (2012). Etică şi deontologie profesională [Professional ethics and deontology]. Iaşi, România: LUMEN.

Granberg, D. O., & Galliher, J. F. (2010). A Most Human Enterprise: Controversies in the Social Sciences. New York, New York: Lexington Books.

Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie Tg.Mureş (n.d.). Etica cercetării privind fiinţele vii, Codul de conduită al cercetătorului din UMF Tg. Mureş [Research ethics regarding living beings, Code of conduct of the researcher from UMF Tg. Mures](pp. 1- 16). Retrieved from https://www.umfst.ro/fileadmin/documente_upload/44-00-36.pdf

The Belmont Report, (1991). Retrieved from http://www.cioms.ch/1991_ texts_of_guidelines.htm Lege nr. 95 din 14 aprilie 2006 privind reforma în domeniul sănătăţii [Law no. 95 of April 14, 2006 on health reform]. Retrieved from http://www.cdep.ro/pls/legis/legis_pck.htp_act_text?idt=72105).

CIOMS, (2016). International ethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans. Retrieved from https://cioms.ch/wpcontent/uploads/2017/01/WEB-CIOMS-EthicalGuidelines.pdf

Downloads

Published

2019-12-21

How to Cite

Costeniuc, M. I. (2019). Autonomy and Responsibility of the Researcher in Research on Human Subjects. Eastern-European Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics, 3(1), 01-10. https://doi.org/10.18662/eejmhb.16