The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Strengthening Civic Participation in the European Union: Ensuring Administrative Transparency and Accessibility in Algorithmic E-Consultation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/12.2/268Keywords:
administrative transparency, artificial intelligence, algorithm, citizen participation, democracy, digital platforms, regulatory legitimacyAbstract
In an era of digital governance, the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) offers new possibilities to meaningfully engage citizens in consultative policymaking processes and prompts fundamental questions about the future of democratic legitimacy in regulatory decision-making within the European Union (EU). The prospect of implementing AI-enabled consultation platforms (AECPs), digital participation platforms run by local administrative bodies that leverage AI to enhance civic participation in policymaking, is thereby worth examining. Drawing on EU instruments such as the AI Act (AIA), General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and Web Accessibility Directive (WAD), and case studies from EU Member States such as Spain and the Netherlands, this paper contends that while AECPs have the potential of enhancing democratic legitimacy by improving accessibility, and scaling participation in administrative consultation, they also carry risks of opacity, bias, arbitrariness, and exclusion. The analysis demonstrates that insofar as algorithm-based participatory tools are carefully integrated in compliance with EU-developed good administration and AI transparency standards, which provide safeguards for accessibility, monitoring, accountability, redress, non-discrimination, and data protection, they can help bridge the democratic gap between citizens and regulators and thus enhance the democratic legitimacy of the administrative process.
References
Alemanno, A. (2020). Levelling the EU participatory playing field: A legal and policy analysis of the commission’s public consultations in light of the principle of political equality. European Law Journal, 26, 118-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12371
Arana-Catania, van Lier F., Procter R., Tkachenko N., He Y., Zubiaga A., & Liakata M. (2021). Citizen Participation and Machine Learning for a Better Democracy. Digital Government: Research & Practice 2(3), 27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3452118
Casado, E. G. (2023). Automated decision-making systems in Spanish administrative law. Ceridap-Rivista Interdisciplinare sul Diritto delle Amministrazioni Pubbliche, 4(1), 26-38. https://doi.org/10.13130/2723-9195/2023-1-119
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2012/C 326/02), Official Journal of the European Union, 391-407, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012P/TXT
Council of Europe (1950), Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (European Convention on Human Rights, as amended). European Treaty Series, No. 005 https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf
Council of Europe (2024), Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law (CETS No. 225). https://rm.coe.int/1680afae3c
Data Protection Authority (2023). First Algorithmic Risks Report Netherlands calls for additional action to control algorithmic and AI risks: Algorithmic Risks Report Netherlands. https://www.autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl/en/current/first-algorithmic-risks-report-netherlands-calls-for-additional-action-to-control-algorithmic-and-ai-risks
Data Protection Authority (2024). AI & Algorithmic Risk Reports Netherlands, AI Risk Report: Turbulent rise of AI calls for vigilance by everyone. https://www.autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl/en/current/ai-risk-report-summer-2024-turbulent-rise-of-ai-calls-for-vigilance-by-everyone
Data Protection Authority (2025). AI and Algorithm Oversight and Coordination: Work Plan. https://www.autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl/en/documents/work-plan-oversight-of-ai-and-algorithms-2025
Directive (EU) 2016/2102 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the accessibility of the websites and mobile applications of public sector bodies 2016/2102, Official Journal of the European Union, L 327, 1-14 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/2102/oj
District Court of the Hague, (2020), ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2020:865, https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/details?id=ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2020:1878
Engstrom, D. F., Ho, D., E. Sharkey, C., M. & Cuéllar M.-F. (2020). Government by algorithm: Artificial Intelligence in federal administrative agencies. NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper, 20–54 https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3551505
EURLEX (2014). Directive (EU) 2014/24 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, L 94, 65–242. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014L0024
EURLEX (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union L 119/1, 1-88. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
EURLEX (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
European Center for Not-for Profit Law (2024). AI for public participation: Hope or hype? https://ecnl.org/news/ai-public-participation-hope-or-hype
European Commission (2021). Better Regulation Guidelines (Commission Staff Working Document, SWD 305 final). Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/better-regulation-guidelines.pdf
European Commission (2023). Better regulation toolbox (Commission Staff Working Document, SWD330 final). Publications Office of the European Union. https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-making-process/better-regulation/better-regulation-guidelines-and-toolbox/better-regulation-toolbox_en
European Commission (2022). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) – Spain.
European Commission (2022). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) - The Netherlands.
Hood, C., Rothstein H., & Baldwin R. (2001). The Government of Risk: Understanding risk regulation regimes. Oxford University Press https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00133.x
Karathanasis T. (2025). Challenges in AI public procurement: Navigating regulatory and practical hurdles. AI Regulation Papers, 5. https://ai-regulation.com/ai-public-procurement-challenges/
Law No. 40/2015 of October 1, 2015, on the Legal Regime of the Public Sector (as amended up to Decision No. 132/2018 of December 13, 2018 of the Constitutional Court), Spain https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/legislation/details/18756
Ministry of Economy, Commerce, and Spain (2022), Charter of Digital Rights https://portal.mineco.gob.es/RecursosArticulo/mineco/ministerio/participacion_publica/audiencia/ficheros/Preliminary%20considerations%20to%20the%20Charter.pdf
Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations (2022), Fundamental Rights and Algorithm Impact Assessment. https://www.government.nl/documents/reports/2021/07/31/impact-assessment-fundamental-rights-and-algorithms.
Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations (2023), Open Government Action Plan 2023-2027 https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Netherlands_Action-Plan_2023-2027_June_EN.pdf.
OECD (2024). 2023 OECD Digital Government Index: Results and key finding https://doi.org/10.1787/1a89ed5e-en
OECD (2025a). Governing with Artificial Intelligence: The state of play and way forward in core government functions. OECD Publishing https://doi.org/10.1787/795de142-en
OECD (2025b). How innovation ecosystems foster citizen participation using emerging technologies in Portugal, Spain and the Netherlands. OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/2cb37a30-en
OECD (2025c). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/api/print?ids=648&lang=en
OECD (2025d), Tackling civic participation challenges with emerging technologies, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/2cb37a30-en
Open Research Amsterdam (2024). Citizen participation methods for Artificial Intelligence. https://openresearch.amsterdam/en/page/110361/citizen-participation-methods-for-artificial-intelligence
Pečarič, M. (2016). Can a group of people be smarter than experts? The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 5(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2016.1259823
Rachovitsa, A., & Johann, N. (2022). The Human Rights implications of the use of AI in the Digital Welfare state: lessons learned from the Dutch SyRI case. Oxford Human Rights Law Review, 22, 1-15, https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngac010
Radaelli, C. (2022).‘Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA). The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan, 1122–1129. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0_136–1
Rangone N. (2022). Improving consultation to ensure the European Union’s democratic legitimacy: From traditional procedural requirements to behavioural insights. European Law Journal, 28(4-6) 154-171 https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12439
Roetzel, P. G. (2019). Information overload in the information age: A review. Business Research 12(2) 479-522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-018-0069-z
Royo, S., Pina, V., & Garcia-Rayado, J. (2020). Decide Madrid: A critical analysis of an award-winning e-participation initiative. Sustainability, 12(4), 1674. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041674
Scharpf, F. (1970). Demokratietheorie zwischen Utopie und Anpassung. Universitätsverlag
Spanish Federation of Municipalities and Provinces, Guía de visualización de datos para Entidades Locales (2022) https://datos.gob.es/sites/default/files/doc/file/guia_de_visualizacion_de_datos_para_entidades_locales_2022-1.pdf.
Spanish State Official Gazette, Law 15/2022 of July 12, 2022, for equal treatment and non-discrimination https://www.boe.es/eli/es/l/2022/07/12/15/con.
Spanish Supreme Court (2025). Administrative Litigation Division Three, Section Judgment no. 1119/2025 R.CASACION/7878/20241R. https://delajusticia.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/REC-CAS-7878-2024-STE-1.119-2025-BORRADOR-LOTUS-1.pdf
European Comission (2024, July 2). Digital Decade 2024: Special Eurobarometer report. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news-redirect/833351
Suchman, M., C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
The Netherlands (2013), Algemene wet bestuursrecht, https://www.acm.nl/sites/default/files/old_publication/publicaties/15446_dutch-general-administrative-law-act.pdf.
Valle-Cruz, D., García-Contreras, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2023). Exploring the negative impacts of artificial intelligence in government: the dark side of intelligent algorithms and cognitive machines. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 90(2) 353-368. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523231187051
Williams, M. L., Burnap, P., Javed, A., Liu, H., & Ozalp, S. (2020). Hate in the machine: Anti-black and anti-muslim social media posts as predictors of offline racially and religiously aggravated crime. The British Journal of Criminology, 60(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azz049
Yeung, K., & Ranchordás S. (2024). An introduction to law and regulation: Text and materials. (2nd ed.) (Law in Context). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009379007
Yeung, K. (2018). Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation. Regulation & Governance, 12(4), 506–507, https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12158
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Faculty of Law and Administrative Sciences, Romania & InManifest Network
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in European Journal of Law and Public Administration.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
EJLPA Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
