The Theory of Abuse of Right in Interwar Romanian Legal Doctrine: The Contributions of Mircea Djuvara and Matei Cantacuzino

Authors

  • Camelia Ignătescu PhD. prof. assoc., ”Ştefan cel Mare” University of Suceava, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/12.2/274

Keywords:

abuse of right, interwar legal doctrine, Mircea Djuvara, Matei Cantacuzino, subjective right, good faith, relativity of rights, finalist theory

Abstract

This study analyzes, through a historical-comparative method, the contributions of two prominent jurists of the Romanian interwar period – Mircea Djuvara and Matei Cantacuzino – to the development of the theory of abuse of right in national legal doctrine. Starting from the European context of the formation of this theory and from the silence of the Civil Code of 1864 on the matter, the article examines the conceptions of both authors through an analysis of their fundamental works and their reception in interwar jurisprudence, highlighting both the convergences and the specificity of each approach. While Djuvara grounds the theory of the relativity of rights on philosophical-legal principles of Kantian inspiration, proposing an objective conception based on the social finality of rights, Cantacuzino adopts a technical-legal perspective, centered on the subjective criterion of intent to harm and the interferences with civil delictual liability. The study demonstrates the contemporary relevance and actuality of the interwar contributions by reference to the regulation of abuse of right in Article 15 of the new Civil Code, while simultaneously offering a comparative analysis with developments in European legal systems (French, German, Swiss) and the jurisprudential applications of this theory in Romanian judicial practice.

References

Alexandresco, D. (1906). Explicaţiunea teoretică şi practică a dreptului civil român (Vol. I, ediţia 1906). Atelierele Grafice Socec.

Boilă, L.R. (2011). Argumente privind consacrarea abuzului de drept ca o ipoteză distinctă de răspundere civilă. Revista Română de Drept Privat, nr. 3/2011. https://www.juridice.ro/163899/revista-romana-de-drept-privat-nr-3-2011-anul-francisc-deak.html

Byers, M. (2000). Abuse of rights: An old principle, a new age. McGill Law Journal, 47, 389-431. https://lawjournal.mcgill.ca/wp-content/uploads/pdf/7097031-47.2.Byers.pdf

Cantacuzino, M.B. (1921). Elementele dreptului civil. Cartea Românească.

Deleanu, I. (1988). Drepturile subiective şi abuzul de drept. Editura Dacia.

Djuvara, M. (1913). Le fondement du phénomène juridique: quelques réflexions sur les principes logiques de la connaissance juridique [Teză de doctorat]. Université de Paris.

Djuvara, M. (1930). Teoria generală a dreptului (Enciclopedia juridică) (Vol. I-III). Socec.

Josserand, L. (2006). De l'esprit des droits et de leur relativité: Théorie dite de l'abus des droits (ed. orig. 1927, pref. D. Deroussin). Dalloz.

Legifrance (2024). Loi n° 2024-346 du 15 avril 2024 visant à adapter le droit de la responsabilité civile aux enjeux actuels. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000049418434

Mayrand, A. (1974). Abuse of rights in France and Quebec. Louisiana Law Review, 34, 997-1028. https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4013&context=lalrev

Parlamentul României (2009). Legea nr. 287/2009 privind Codul civil, republicată în Monitorul Oficial al României, Partea I, nr. 505 din 15 iulie 2011. https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocumentAfis/109883

Paulsson, J. (2021). The unruly notion of abuse of rights. Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-12

How to Cite

Ignătescu, C. (2025). The Theory of Abuse of Right in Interwar Romanian Legal Doctrine: The Contributions of Mircea Djuvara and Matei Cantacuzino. European Journal of Law and Public Administration, 12(2), 226-238. https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/12.2/274

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025): European Journal of Law and Public Administration

Section

Law and Social Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Faculty of Law and Administrative Sciences, Romania & InManifest Network

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in European Journal of Law and Public Administration.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

EJLPA  Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND

CC_BY_NC_ND