Crisis and Risk Communication or Propaganda and Disinformation: Rhetorical Strategies That Blur the Lines between Strategy and Manipulation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/12.2/273Keywords:
crisis and risk communication, disinformation techniques, logical fallacies, critical cultural studiesAbstract
The following analysis focuses on convergent areas between classical rhetorical strategies in strategic communication and propagandistic or deceptive discourse. Drawing on a framework based on critical cultural studies, it contends that corporate apology rhetoric may function as coercive communication approach, limiting audiences' interpretive agency and obstructing reflexive judgment. By screening impression management and reputation-repair strategies against modern disinformation techniques, it is shown that both rhetorical repertoires present structural vulnerability towards logical fallacies and various deceptive tropes. While research on disinformation has yielded significant insights into the mechanisms and ramifications of fake news, these findings have seldom been systematically incorporated into crisis and risk communication scholarship or practice. This article aims to address this gap by highlighting the conceptual and functional similarities between apologetic and deceptive rhetorical approaches. To disentangle crisis communication from propaganda, it is argued, a new language and rhetorical approach need to be developed.
References
Allen, M. W., & Caillouet, R. H. (1994). Legitimation endeavors: Impression management strategies used by an organization in crisis. Communications Monographs, 61(1), 44-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759409376322
Au, Y. (2021). Surveillance as a service. The European AI-assisted mass surveillance marketplace. Oxford Commission on AI & Good Governance.
Bago, B., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2020). Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines. Journal of experimental psychology: general, 149(8), 1608-1613. https://ide.mit.edu/sites/default/files/publications/manuscript_fake_new_fast_slow_01.07.pdf
Bakir, V. (2020). Psychological operations in digital political campaigns: Assessing Cambridge Analytica's psychographic profiling and targeting. Frontiers in Communication, 5, 67. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00067
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity Press
Bauman, Z. (2007). Liquid times. Living in an age of uncertainty. Polity Press
Benoit, W. L. (1995). Sears’ repair of its auto service image: Image restoration discourse in the corporate sector. Communication Studies, 46(1-2), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979509368441
Bialek, M., & Pennycook, G. (2018). The cognitive reflection test is robust to multiple exposures. Behavior research methods, 50, 1953-1959. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0963-x
Blyth, M. (2013). Austerity: The history of a dangerous idea. Oxford University Press
Bowell, T. (2023). Whataboutisms: The good, the bad and the ugly. Informal Logic, 43(1), 91-112. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v43i1.7304
Brock, J. W. (1987). Bigness is the problem, not the solution. Challenge, 30(3), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/05775132.1987.11471169
Buell, L. (2014). Enough is enough?: Re-imagining an ethics and aesthetics of sustainability for the twenty-first century. In K. Syse & M. Muller (Eds.), Sustainable Consumption and the Good Life (pp. 7-26). Routledge
Burič, R., & Šrol, J. (2020). Individual differences in logical intuitions on reasoning problems presented under two-response paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 32(4), 460-477. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2020.1766472
Chaudhary, P. (2022). Fallacies in the age of social media. International Journal of Philosophical Practice, 8(1), 155-161. https://doi.org/10.5840/ijpp20228111
Coman, C. (2009). Comunicarea de criză. Tehnici şi strategii. Polirom.
Coombs, W. T. (2009). Conceptualizing crisis comunication. În R. L. Heath & H. D. O’Hair (Eds.), Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication (pp. 99 - 119). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Coombs, W.T., & Holladay, S.J. (Eds.) (2010). The handbook of crisis communication. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
De Beco, G. (2017). Protecting the invisible: an intersectional approach to international human rights law. Human Rights Law Review, 17(4), 633-663. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngx029
Dobber, T., Metoui, N., Trilling, D., Helberger, N., & de Vreese, C. (2021). Do (microtargeted) deepfakes have real effects on political attitudes?. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(1), 69-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220944364
Duncan, J. (2022). The death of neoliberalism? UK responses to the pandemic.The International Journal of Human Rights, 26(3), 494-517. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2021.1945583
Edgington, D. (2017). Validity, uncertainty and vagueness. În D. Graff & T. Williamson (Eds.), Vagueness (pp. 207-217). Routledge
Fleming, P. (2012). The end of corporate social responsibility: Crisis and critique. Sage Publications
Fofiu, A. (2015). Perceptions of time in the sustainability movement: The value of slow for sustainable futures. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Social Analysis, 5(1), 63-79. http://193.16.218.141/acta-social/C5-1/social51-05.pdf
Fumagalli, R. (2020). Slipping on slippery slope arguments. Bioethics, 34(4), 412-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12727
Gauthier, B. (2018). Strategic communication in Canada. Planning effective PR campaigns. Canadian Scholars Press
Gawande, A. (2010). The checklist manifesto. Picadur
Giddens, A. (1994). Beyond left and right. The future of radical politics. Stanford University Press
Goldberg, J. (2010). Fascismul liberal: istoria secretă a stângii americane de la Mussolini la politica semnificaţiei. C. Olariu (Trad.). Polirom
Graeber, D. (2011). Debt: The first five thousand years. Melville House
Gu, L., Kropotov, V., & Yorachkin, F. (2017). The fake news machine. How propagandists abuse the internet and manipulate the public. TrandsLab.
Harkova, E. V., & Shigapova, F. F. (2014). Functional features of metaphoric and metonymic euphemisms in media discourse. European Journal of Science and Theology, 11(6), 105-113. https://www.ejst.tuiasi.ro/Files/49/11_Harkova%20&%20Shigapova.pdf
Hearit, K. M., & Roberson, K. M. (2009). Denial, differentiation, and appology: On the use of apologia in crisis management. În R. L. Heath & H. D. O’Hair (Eds.), Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication (pp. 542 - 559). New York & London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group
Heath, R.L. (2010). Introduction – Crisis communication: Defining the beast and de-marginalizing key publics, în W. T. Coombs & S.J. Holladay (Eds.), The Handbook of Crisis Communication (pp. 1-13). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Hersh, M. A. (2013). Barriers to ethical behaviour and stability: stereotyping and scapegoating as pretexts for avoiding responsibility. Annual reviews in control, 37(2), 365-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2013.09.013
Horák, A., Baisa, V., & Herman, O. (2021). Technological approaches to detecting online disinformation and manipulation. Challenging online propaganda and disinformation in the 21st century, 139-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58624-9_5
Janoschka, M., & Mota, F. (2021). New municipalism in action or urban neoliberalisation reloaded? An analysis of governance change, stability and path dependence in Madrid (2015–2019). Urban studies, 58(13), 2814-2830. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020925345
Jin, Z., Lalwani, A., Vaidhya, T., Shen, X., Ding, Y., Lyu, Z., ... & Schoelkopf, B. (2022). Logical fallacy detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.13758.
Jones-Jang, S. M., Mortensen, T., & Liu, J. (2021). Does media literacy help identification of fake news? Information literacy helps, but other literacies don’t. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2), 371-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219869406
Kuratko, D. F., Holt, H. L., & Neubert, E. (2020). Blitzscaling: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Business Horizons, 63(1), 109-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.10.002
Kurzwelly, J., Fernana, H., & Ngum, M. E. (2020). The allure of essentialism and extremist ideologies. Anthropology Southern Africa, 43(2), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/23323256.2020.1759435
Lewandowsky, S., & Van Der Linden, S. (2021). Countering misinformation and fake news through inoculation and prebunking. European Review of Social Psychology, 32(2), 348-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2021.1876983
Loveless, M. (2020). Information and democracy: Fake news as an emotional weapon. In M. Loveless (Ed.), Democracy and Fake News (pp. 64-76). Routledge
Lynd, S., & Grubačić, A. (2008). Wobblies and Zapatistas: Conversations on anarchism, Marxism, and radical history. PM Press
Macagno, F. (2022). Argumentation profiles and the manipulation of common ground. The arguments of populist leaders on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics, 191, 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.01.022
Manninen, B. A. (2018). False cause: Ignoring common cause. În R. Arp, S. Barbone, & M. Bruce (Eds.), Bad Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Fallacies in Western Philosophy (pp. 338-341). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119165811.ch79
McGregor, I. (2006). Zeal appeal: The allure of moral extremes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 343-348. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2804_7
McGregor, I., & Marigold, D. C. (2003). Defensive zeal and the uncertain self: What makes you so sure? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 838-852. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.838
McGregor, I., Zanna, M. P., Holmes, J.G., & Spencer, S. J., (2001). Compensatory conviction in the face of personal uncertainty: Going to extremes and being oneself. Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 80, 472-488.
Mehand, M. S., Al-Shorbaji, F., Millett,P.,& Murgue, B. (2018). The WHO R&D Blueprint: 2018 review of emerging infectious diseases requiring urgent research and development efforts. Antiviral Res, 159, 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2018.09.009
Michaud, N. (2018). Inappropriate appeal to authority. În R. Arp, S. Barbone, & M. Bruce (Eds.), Bad Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Fallacies in Western Philosophy (pp. 168-171). Wiley-Blackwell.
Mihai, M. (2022). Foundational moments, representative claims and the ecology of social ignorance. Political Studies, 70(4), 962-982. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321721995639
Musi, E., & Reed, C. (2022). From fallacies to semi-fake news: Improving the identification of misinformation triggers across digital media. Discourse & Society, 33(3), 349-370. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221076609
Oliveira, R. D. F., Schiozer, R. F., & Barros, L. A. D. C. (2011). Financial crisis and cross-border too big to fail perception, In Midwest finance association 2012 annual meetings paper.
Omojunikanbi, N. C. (2022). Public relations and effective communication during a global health crisis: Combating disinformation, misinformation, and fake news on Covid-19. Journal of Communication and Media Research, 14(1), Special Issue 2, 64-71. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ngozi-Omojunikanbi/publication/374328549_Public_relations_and_effective_communication_during_a_global_health_crisis_Combating_disinformation_misinformation_and_fake_news_on_Covid-19/links/651843cf3ab6cb4ec6ae62b7/Public-relations-and-effective-communication-during-a-global-health-crisis-Combating-disinformation-misinformation-and-fake-news-on-Covid-19.pdf
Opgenhaffen, M. (2023). Combatting disinformation with crisis communication: An analysis of Meta’s newsroom stories. Communications, 48(3), 352-369. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2022-0101
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2019). The thinker's guide to fallacies: The art of mental trickery and manipulation. Rowman & Littlefield
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. Journal of personality, 88(2), 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12476
Quaranto, A., & Stanley, J. (2021). Propaganda. În J. Khoo & R. K. Sterken (Eds.),The Routledge handbook of social and political philosophy of language (pp. 125-146). Routledge.
Renn, O. (2001). The role of risk communication in public dialogue for improving risk management. În S. Gerrard, R. Kerry Turner & I.J. Bateman (Eds.), Environmental risk planning and management (pp. 312 - 337). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Renn, O. (2008). Risk Governance: Coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Earthsan.
Renn, O. (2009). Risk communication: Insights and requirement for designing successful communication programs on health and environmental hazards. În R. L. Heath & H. D. O’Hair (Eds.), Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication (pp. 80 - 98). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Rietdijk, N. (2024). Post-truth politics and collective gaslighting. Episteme, 21(1), 229-245. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2021.24
Rogers, P. (27 Martie, 2020). Austerity in the age of COVID-19: A match made in hell?. Oxford Research Group. https://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/austerity-in-the-age-of-covid-19-a-match-made-in-hell
Ross, R. M., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2021). Beyond “fake news”: Analytic thinking and the detection of false and hyperpartisan news headlines. Judgment and Decision making, 16(2), 484-504. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500008640
Ryan, F. (2019). Crippled: Austerity and the demonization of disabled people. Verso Books.
Salter, C. (2011). Activism as terrorism: The green scare, radical environmentalism and governmentality. Anarchism Developments in Cultural Studies, 1, 211 – 238. https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/adcs/article/view/17126/7340
Scott, J. C. (2007). În numele statului: modele eşuate de îmbunătăţire a condiţiei umane. A. Pelea (Trad.). Polirom
Scott, J. C. (2012). Two cheers for anarchism. Princeton University Press
Shahbazi, M., & Bunker, D. (2024). Social media trust: Fighting misinformation in the time of crisis. International Journal of Information Management, 77, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102780
Sim, J., & Tombs, S. (2022). Narrating the coronavirus crisis: state talk and state silence in the UK. Justice, Power and Resistance, 5(1-2), 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1332/XFUQ5523
Snowden, E. (2019). Dosar permanent. D. Drumur, R. Toma, M. Adam, & M. Ioncelescu (Trads.). Nemira
United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2005). HHS Pandemic Influenza Plan. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pdf/professionals/hhspandemicinfluenzaplan.pdf
Žižek, S. (2012). The year of dreaming dangerously. Verso Books
Zyl, A. V., Turpin, M., & Matthee, M. (2020, April). How can critical thinking be used to assess the credibility of online information?. In Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society (pp. 199-210). Springer, Cham.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Faculty of Law and Administrative Sciences, Romania & InManifest Network
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in European Journal of Law and Public Administration.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
EJLPA Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
