Guidelines for Construction of Ethical Policies Regarding the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Education and Research

Authors

  • Antonio Sandu PhD.prof.habil., „Ștefan cel Mare” University, Suceava, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/12.1/259

Keywords:

ethics policy, artificial intelligence, ethical frameworks, education, research

Abstract

This study explores the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on contemporary social structures, with a particular focus on the fields of education and academic research. By analyzing the phenomenon of virtualization of social space, the paper highlights the fundamental transformations in modes of interaction, learning, and intellectual production generated by the ubiquity of digital technologies and AI. In the educational context, the study examines the reconfiguration of the educator's role and traditional pedagogical practices in the face of the emergence of the "virtual teacher" and AI's ability to surpass human limitations in storing and transmitting information. It emphasizes the need for a redefinition of the teacher's mission, oriented towards developing critical thinking and cultivating a passion for knowledge. In the sphere of academic research, the paper addresses the ethical and epistemological challenges raised by the integration of AI, especially concerning the authenticity and integrity of intellectual production. It analyzes the implications of using AI in generating academic content and explores the emerging concept of "post-plagiarism," which reconfigures traditional notions of originality and intellectual property. The study also examines emerging regulations and policies at global and national levels regarding the use of AI in academia, highlighting the need for ethical and methodological frameworks adapted to the new technological reality. It highlights the potential of AI as a tool for augmenting cognitive capacities, alongside the risks associated with its uncontrolled use. The paper argues for a reflective and critical approach to integrating AI into social and institutional structures, emphasizing the importance of developing an ethics of AI use that promotes human progress while maintaining the fundamental values of autonomy, creativity, and individual responsibility. An interdisciplinary perspective is proposed to overcome the complexities of the digital era, aiming to harmonize the potential of AI with essential human needs and values in shaping the future of education and academic research.

References

Cambridge University Press (2025). The use of generative AI in coursework. https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/exam-administration/cambridge-exams-officers-guide/phase-3-coursework-and-moderation/generative-ai-in-coursework/

Caranfil, N. (2002). Filantropica [film]. Media Pro Pictures (coproducție).

COPE Council. (2023). COPE position - Authorship and AI - English. https://doi.org/10.24318/cCVRZBms

Eaton, S. E. (2023). Postplagiarism: Transdisciplinary ethics and integrity in the age of artificial intelligence and neurotechnology. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00144-1

Elsevier (2023). Generative AI policies for journals. https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies-and-standards/generative-ai-policies-for-journals

Harvard University (2023). Initial guidelines for using ChatGPT and other generative AI tools at Harvard. https://huit.harvard.edu/news/ai-guidelines

JAMA Network (2023). Instructions for Authors. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/pages/instructions-for-authors#SecUseofAIinPublicationandResearch

JCQ – Joint Council for Qualifications (April, 2025). AI use in assessment: Protecting the integrity of qualifications. https://www.jcq.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/AI-Use-in-Assessments_Apr25_FINAL.pdf

Kosmyna, N., Hauptmann, E., Yuan, Y. T., Situ, J., Liao, X. H., Beresnitzky, A. V., ... & Maes, P. (2025). Your brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of cognitive debt when using an ai assistant for essay writing task. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.08872.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.08872

MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2025). Guidance for use of Generative AI tools. https://ist.mit.edu/ai-guidance

Nature (2023). Artificial Intelligence (AI) - editorial policies. Nature Portfolio https://www.nature.com/nature-portfolio/editorial-policies/ai

Porsdam Mann, S., Vazirani, A. A., Aboy, M., Earp, B. D., Minssen, T., Cohen, I. G., & Savulescu, J. (2024). Guidelines for ethical use and acknowledgement of large language models in academic writing. Nature Machine Intelligence, 6(11), 1272-1274. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-024-00922-7

Sandu A. (2013). Sexul pe internet formă de virtualizare a spaţiului social. Revista de Cercetare şi Intervenţie Socială, 2, 154- 161

Sandu, A. (2020a). Bioetica în criză, sau criza bioeticii? O filosofie a pandemiei în societatea medicalizată. Lumen

Sandu, A. (2020b). Pandemic - Catalyst of the virtualization of the social space, Postmodern Openings, 11(1Sup2), pages 115-140. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.1sup2/146

Sandu, A. (2023). Perspective etice si antropologice asupra utilizării A.I. https://youtu.be/wOLE0oTKwGg?si=rm9DROG0wfiYJVM5

Science. (2023). Science Journals: Editorial policies https://www.science.org/content/page/science-journals-editorial-policies

Springer (2023). Artificial Intelligence (AI) [Editorial Policies]. https://www.springer.com/gp/editorial-policies/artificial-intelligence--ai-/25428500?srsltid=AfmBOorxRTY7xfgqtIjQdB8PW8UBm6vTW_HNAr3bziVspzl2dWDjARt8

Stanford University. (2023). Generative AI Policy Guidance. https://communitystandards.stanford.edu/generative-ai-policy-guidance

Stokel-Walker, C., & Van Noorden, R. (2023). What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science. Nature, 614(7947), 214-216. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00340-6

Universitatea Babeș-Bolyai din Cluj-Napoca (2023). Utilizarea instrumentelor de inteligență artificială, precum sistemele avansate de procesare a limbajului natural bazate pe modele generative, în elaborarea lucrărilor academice de către studenții și masteranzii Departamentului de Sociologie de la Facultatea de Sociologie și Asistență Socială a Universității Babeș- Bolyai. Cerințe și recomandări aplicabile în anul universitar 2023-2024. https://socasis.ubbcluj.ro/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Ghid-de-folosire-a-inteligentei-artificiale.pdf

Universitatea de Medicină și Farmacie „Carol Davila” din București (2024). Regulament privind utilizarea Inteligenței Artificiale în activitățile academice în cadrul Universității de Medicină și Farmacie „Carol Davila” din București. https://umfcd.ro/wp-content/uploads/2025/MANAGEMENTUL_CALITATII/REGULAMENTE/INTEGRITATE_ACADEMICA/Regulament%20privind%20utilizarea%20Inteligentei%20Artificiale%20in%20activitatile%20academice%20in%20cadrul%20UMFCD.pdf

Universitatea Politehnica din București (2024). Regulament privind organizarea şi funcționarea studiilor universitare de masterat în Universitatea Naţională de Ştiinţă şi Tehnologie POLITEHNICA Bucureşti. https://upb.ro/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Regulament-privind-organizarea-si-functionarea-studiilor-universitare-de-masterat.pdf

University of Cambridge (2025). How we use generative AI tools. https://www.communications.cam.ac.uk/generative-ai-tool-guidelines

University of Oxford (2025). Guidelines on the use of generative AI. https://communications.admin.ox.ac.uk/communications-resources/ai-guidance

Downloads

Published

2025-08-25

How to Cite

Sandu, A. . (2025). Guidelines for Construction of Ethical Policies Regarding the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Education and Research. European Journal of Law and Public Administration, 12(1), 98-118. https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/12.1/259