Surrogacy in the Context of Reproductive Rights

Authors

  • Loredana Terec-Vlad PhD student, Doctoral School of the Titu Maiorescu University in Bucharest

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/10.2/207

Keywords:

surrogacy, reproductive rights, human rights

Abstract

The evolution of the medical technologies has also transformed the surrogate, from the traditional surrogate to the gestational surrogate, from the surrogate with the embryo of the infertile couple to the surrogate with embryos from donors or with embryos obtained from gametes taken from donors (surrogate mother or another person), from carrying a pregnancy by a woman of biological reproductive age and up to carrying a pregnancy by a woman past the reproductive age, all these stages or forms of surrogacy imply various debates in the medical, bioethical and, of course, human rights literature. As the forms of surrogacy diversified, the multitude of rights that had to be balanced (of the infertile couple, of the parents, of the surrogate mother, of the embryo in vitro or of the embryo transplanted into the uterus) were also increasingly difficult to quantify, to define as legal and to keep in a fair balance.

References

***, Hotărârea de Guvern nr. 124/2013 privind aprobarea programelor naționale de sănătate pentru anii 2013 și 2014, publicată în Monitorul Oficial al României, nr. 172 din 29.03.2013.

***, Hotărârea de Guvern nr. 1388/2010 privind aprobarea programelor naționale de sănătate pentru anii 2011 și 2012, Publicată în Monitorul Oficial al României, nr. 893 din 31.01.2011.

***, Hotărârea de Guvern nr. 155/2017 privind aprobarea programelor naționale de sănătate pentru anii 2017 și 2018, publicată în Monitorul Oficial al României, nr. 222 din 31.03.2017.

***, Hotărârea de Guvern nr. 206/2015 privind aprobarea programelor naționale de sănătate pentru anii 2015 și 2016, publicată în Monitorul Oficial al României, nr. 208 din 30.03.2015.

***, Legea nr. 95/2006 privind reforma în domeniul sănătății, Publicată în Monitorul Oficial al României, nr. 372 din 28.04.2006.

***, Nevada Surrogacy Insurance Bill AB 472, 2019. Disponibil la: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/Session/80th2019/Bills/AB/AB472.pdf (accesat la data de 27.12.2022).

Amato, Paula; Jacob, Mary Casey, „Providing Fertility Services to Lesbian Couples: The Lesbian Baby Boom”, în Sexuality, Reproduction and Menopause, vol. 2, nr. 2/2004, pp. 83 – 86. Disponibil la: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.sram.2004.04.005 (accesat la data de 22.08.2022).

American Surrogacy, What You Need to Know About the History of Surrogacy, n.d. Disponibil la: https://www.americansurrogacy.com/surrogacy/history-of-surrogacy (accesa la data de 27.06.2022).

Beauchamp, Tom L.; Childress, James F., Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Edit. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2019.

California Court of Appeal, Johnson v. Calvert, case no. 5 Cal.4th 84 , 19 Cal.Rptr.2d 494; 851 P.2d 776, 1990. Disponibil la: https://scocal.stanford.edu/opinion/johnson-v-calvert-31446 (accesat la data de 23.05.2022).

Collins, John A., „Reproductive Technology. The Price of Progress”, în New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 331, nr. 4/1994, pp. 270 – 271. Disponibil la: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199407283310412 (accesat la data de 05.10.2021).

Deech, Ruth, „Reproductive Tourism in Europe: Infertility and Human Rights”, în Global Governance, vol. 9, nr. 4/2003, pp. 425-432. Disponibil la: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27800494 (accesat la data de 24.01.2022).

Direcția de Investigare a Infracțiunilor de Criminalitate Organizată și Terorism, DIICOT: 12 mame surogat implicate în traficul cu ovule umane de la spitalul Athena din Timișoara, 2014. Disponibil la: https://www.agerpres.ro/justitie/2014/05/30/diicot-12-mame-surogat-implicate-in-traficul-cu-ovule-umane-de-la-spitalul-athena-din-timisoara-14-54-02 (consultat la data de 06.06.2022).

Falasco, Joseph Russell, „Frozen Embryos and Gamete Providers’ Rights: A Suggested Model for Embryo Disposition”, în Jurimetrics Journal, vol. 43, nr. 3/2005, pp. 273-300. Disponibil la: https://www.jstor.org/stable/29762898 (accesat la data de 31.10.2022).

Hewitson, Gillian, „The Market for Surrogate Motherhood Contracts”, în Economic Record, vol. 73, nr. 222/1997, pp. 212-224. Disponibil la: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1997.tb00994.x (accesat la data de 29.08.2022).

Huidu, Alexandra, „Parsson and Săvulescu’s Unfit for the Future or the Starting Point for the Deconstruction of the Concept of Parentality”, în Postmodern Openings, vol. 10, nr. 1/2019, pp. 200-219. Disponibil la: http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/po/63 (accesat la data de 25.10.2021).

Macklin, Ruth; Delaney, S. R., „Artificial Means of Reproduction and Our Understanding of the Family”, în The Hastings Center Report, vol. 21/1991. Disponibil la: https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Artificial+means+of+reproduction+and+our+understanding+of+the+family-a09373674 (accesat la data de 24.10.2022).

Markens, Susan, Surrogate Motherhood and the Politics of Reproduction, Edit. University of California Press, California, SUA, 2007.

Olaru, Bogdan, „Problema autonomiei și limitele folosirii tehnologiilor reproducerii asistate”, în Revista Română de Bioetică, vol. 3, nr. 3/2005. Disponibil la: https://www.academia.edu/27293715/Autonomy_and_the_limits_of_assisted_reproduction_technologies (accesat la data de 31.01.2022).

Patel, Nayana Hitesh; Jadeja, Yuvraj Digvijaysingh; Bhadarka, Harsha Karsan; Patel, Molina Niket; Patel, Niket Hitesh; Sodagar, Nilofar Rahematkhan, „Insight into Different Aspects of Surrogacy Practices”, în Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, vol. 11, nr. 3/2018, pp. 212-218. Disponibil la: https://doi.org/10.4103%2Fjhrs.JHRS_138_17 (accesat la data de 28.03.2022).

Patterson, Mark R., „Surrogacy and Slavery: The Problems of Consent in Baby M. Romance of the Republic and PuddNhead Wilson”, în American Literary History, vol. 8, nr. 3/1996, pp. 449-470. Disponibil la: https://www.jstor.org/stable/490152 (accesat la data de 29.11.2021).

Raymond, Janice G., „Reproductive Gifts and Gift Giving: The Altruistic Woman”, în The Hastings Center Report, vol. 20, nr. 6/1990, pp. 7-11. Disponibil la: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3563416 (accesat la data de 30.05.2022).

Reznik, Oleg M.; Yakushchenko, Yuliia M., „Legal Considerations Surrounding Surrogacy in Ukraine”, în Wiadomości Lekarskie, vol. LXXIII, nr. 5/2020, pp. 1048-1052. Disponibil la: https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek202005139 (consultat la data de 22.11.2022).

Robertson, John A., „Gay and Lesbian Access to Assisted Reproductive Technology”, în Case Western Reserve Law Review, vol. 55, nr. 2/2005, pp. 323-372. Disponibil la: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1582&context=caselrev (accesat la data de 03.10.2022).

Supreme Court of New Jersey, Matter of Baby M., case no. 109 N.J. 396, 1988. Disponibil la: https://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/supreme-court/1988/109-n-j-396-1.html (consultat la data de 25.04.2022).

Velte, Kyle C., „Egging on Lesbian Maternity: The Legal Implications of Tri-Gametic In Vitro Fertilization”, în The American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy and the Law, nr. 7/2013, p. 2. Disponibil la: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Egging-on-Lesbian-Maternity%3A-The-Legal-Implications-Velte/bafa1fcec8cb9727611a3d15b9494ad4b7ab79c4 (accesat la data de 28.02.2022).

Worldwide Surrogacy, The History of Surrogacy: A Legal Timeline, 2021. Disponibil la: https://www.worldwidesurrogacy.org/blog/the-history-of-surrogacy-a-legal-timeline (accesat la data de 25.07.2022).

Downloads

Published

2023-12-20

How to Cite

Terec-Vlad, L. (2023). Surrogacy in the Context of Reproductive Rights. European Journal of Law and Public Administration, 10(2), 34-45. https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/10.2/207

Issue

Section

International Law. European Law. Comparative Law.

Publish your work at the Scientific Publishing House LUMEN

It easy with us: publish now your work, novel, research, proceeding at Lumen Scientific Publishing House

Send your manuscript right now