Regulation of the Smart Contract in (Romanian) Civil Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/8.2/164Keywords:
smart contract, civil law, traditional contracts, blockchain, EthereumAbstract
The research aims to organize, examine, and analyze the provisions on smart contracts available in Romanian civil law. “Smart contracts” are not smart, and are not necessarily contracts, although they can be.
As self-executing computer programs, smart contracts are operational on the blockchain and unlike traditional legal contracts, once the agreement has been concluded and the smart contract is set in motion, no party can intervene and it will be executed without interruption, modification, or breach.
The crucial question in the final contract law topic is what happens when the smart contract's outcomes deviate from those required by law. To answer this issue, we must first understand that whether a smart contract becomes legally enforceable is determined by several circumstances, together with the unique use case, the type of smart contract employed, and the existing legislation.
The paper addresses the subject of determining and regulating smart contracts under Romanian current laws. Particular emphasis is placed on two ambiguous definitions of smart contracts: as computer code and as a civil-law contract. The authors conclude that the concept of smart contracts requires more legal regulation, particularly in terms of managing their meaning and comprehension.
References
Adcock, C. (2020). An Update on State Smart Contract Legislation. The National Law Review, 10(106). https://www.natlawreview.com/article/update-state-smart-contract-legislation
Akyuz, G. A., & Gursoy, G. (2020). Transformation of Supply Chain Activities in Blockchain Environment. In U. Hacioglu (Ed.), Digital Business Strategies in Blockchain Ecosystems. Transformational Design and Future of Global Business (pp. 153-177). Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Bambara, J., & Allen P. (2010). Blockchain A Practical Guide to Developing Business, Law, and Technology Solutions. McGraw-Hill Education.
Chamber of Digital Commerce (2016, November 8). Panel 1: Law 2.0 Understanding Smart Contracts [Video file]. YouTube. Chamber of Digital Commerce. https://youtu.be/ZuHZOryZ_f0
Buterin, V. (2013). Ethereum Whitepaper. Etherum. https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper/
Çağlıyangil, M., Erdem, S., & Özdağoğlu, G. (2020). A Blockchain-Based Framework for Blood Distribution. In U. Hacioglu (Ed.), Digital Business Strategies in Blockchain Ecosystems. Transformational Design and Future of Global Business (pp. 63-83). Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Chen, J., Xia, X., Lo, D., Grundy, J., & Luo, X., Chen, T. (2020). Defining Smart Contract Defects on Ethereum. In IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2020.2989002
CoinMarket Cap (2020). Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Cap. CoinmarketCap https://coinmarketcap.com/
Drummer, D., & Neumann, D. (2020). Is code law? Current legal and technical adoption issues and remedies for blockchain-enabled smart contracts. Journal of Information Technology, 35(4), 337-360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396220924669
Durovic, M. (2019). The Formation of Smart Contracts and Beyond: Shaking the Fundamentals of Contract Law? In L. DiMatteo, M. Cannarsa & C. Poncibo (Eds.), Smart Contracts and Blockchain Technology: Role of Contract Law (pp. 1-27). Kings College London.
Harari, Y. N. (2018). Homo deus. Scurtă istorie a viitorului [Homo deus. A brief history of the future]. Polirom.
Kosba, A., Miller, A., Shi, E., Wen, Z., & Papamanthou, C. (2016). Hawk: The Blockchain Model of Cryptography and Privacy-Preserving Smart Contracts. 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 839-858. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2016.55
Levy, K. (2017). Book-Smart, Not Street-Smart: Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts and The Social Workings of Law. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 3, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2017.107
Raskin, M. (2017). The Law and Legality of Smart Contracts. Georgetown Law Technology Review, (304), 305-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2842258
Romanian Parliament. (2011). Legea nr. 287 din 24 iulie 2009 privind Codul Civil [Law no. 287/2009 regarding the Civil Code]. Monitorul Oficial, partea I, 511, 17 Iulie 2009 [Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, no. 511 of July 17, 2009], republished in the Monitorul Oficial, partea I, 409, 10 Iunie 2011 [Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, no. 409 of June 10, 2011]. http://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/175630
Sanitt, A. (2019). Smart Contracts. Norton Rose Fulbright. https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en/knowledge/publications/1bcdc200/smart-contracts
Savelyev, A. (2016). Contract Law 2.0: «Smart» Contracts As the Beginning of the End of Classic Contract Law. National Research University Higher School of Economics, (71), 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2885241
Siegel, D. (2016). Understanding The DAO Attack. https://pullnews.medium.com/understanding-the-dao-hack-for-journalists-2312dd43e993
Sklaroff, J. M. (2017). Smart Contracts and the Cost of Inflexibility. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 263-303. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3008899
Stătescu, C., & Bîrsan, C. (2008). Drept civil. Teoria generală a obligaţiilor [Civil law. General theory of obligations]. Hamangiu.
Szabo, N. (1997). Formalizing and Securing Relationships on Public Networks. First Monday, 2(9). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v2i9.548
Szabo, N. (2017). Winning Strategies for Smart Contracts. Blockchain Research Institute. https://www.blockchainresearchinstitute.org/project/smart-contracts/
The European Union Blockchain Observatory and Forum. (2018). Blockchain for Government and Public Services. Thematic Report.
Tjong Tjin Tai, E. (2018). Force Majeure and Excuses in Smart Contracts. European Review of Private Law, 26(6), 787-804. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3183637
Toshev & Boteva. (2019). Blockchain technologies in healthcare – opportunities, and perspectives. Toshevboteva https://www.toshevboteva.com/news/blockchain-technologies-in-healthcare-opportunities-and-perspectives
Werbach, K., Cornell, N. (2017). Contracts Ex Machina. Duke Law Journal, 67(313), 314-381. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2936294
Woebbeking, M. K. (2019). The Impact of Smart Contracts on Traditional Concepts of Contract Law. JIPITEC, 10(106). https://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-10-1-2019/4880
Xu, X., Weber, I., & Staples, M. (2019). Architecture for Blockchain Applications (1st ed.). Springer.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Faculty of Law and Administrative Sciences, Romania & LUMEN Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work, with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g. post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in European Journal of Law and Public Administration.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as an earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
EJLPA Journal has an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
CC BY-NC-ND
