Economic and Environmental Implications Determined by the Implementation of the New Principles and Norms Regard in Ggreen Public Procurement (GPP)

Authors

  • Ionel BOSTAN Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Faculty of Law and Administrative Sciences
  • Teodora ROMAN Al. I. Cuza University of Iasi, Department of Management, Marketing and Business Administration
  • Adriana MANOLICA Al. I. Cuza University of Iasi, Department of Management, Marketing and Business Administration

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/7.1/110

Keywords:

Green public procurement, sustainable development, environmental management, Government Procurement Agreement, EMAS.

Abstract

Our study highlights the potential benefits, as well as the main obstacles to the efficient application of green public procurement (GPP).In this regard, we address the main aspects of this issue, with reference to what exists in the EU and Romania. On the whole, the progress is still modest in this direction. In the same context, we treat the legal possibility of using environmental management systems to integrate environmental protection requirements into the public agenda. Given the advantages of GPP, as well as their scale at national and European level, we believe that we have sufficiently argued the need to urgently introduce requirements for environmental sustainability into the GPP system.

References

Roman T, Bostan I, Manolica A, Mitrica I. Profile of green consumers in Romania in light of sustainability challenges and opportunities. Sustainability, 2015, 7: 6394–6411.

Pagliacci M, Manolica A, Roman T, Boldureanu G. The Consumers of Green Products. The Case of Romanian Moldavia Counties. Amfiteatru Economic. 2019; 21 (Special No. 13): 830-844.

Pohoata I, Bostan I, Prelipcean G, Drugus D, Morariu A, Bunget O. Equity, intra/inter-generation equalization and profit, in the context of the right to a healthy life and a clean environment. Rev. Rom. Bioet. 2014, 12: 58–69.

Bostan I, Roman T, Manolica A, Morariu A, Nastase C, Asalos N. Changing attitudes towards the environment by using corporate social responsibility (CSR) campaigns in the oil industry. Environmental Engineering & Management Journal (EEMJ), 2016; 15(6).

Bostan I. An Analysis of the “bio”/”eco” Products Market, Referring to the EU and Romania. CES—Working Papers. 2016; VIII (1): 33–44. Available from: http://www.ceswp.uaic.ro/articles/CESWP2016_VIII1_BOS.pdf (accessed on 29 December 2019)

Bostan I, Lazar CM, Asaloș N. Legislative Means Aimed at Stimulating Green Procurement in the Public Sector. A Critical Case Study of Romania. Amfiteatru Economic. 2020; 22(53): 221-238. DOI:10.24818/EA/2019/53/221.

Hollos D, Blome C, Foerstl K. Does sustainable supplier cooperation affect performance?, International Journal of Production Research. 2012; 50, (11): 2968–2986.

Reuter C, Foerstl K, Hartmann E, Blome C. Sustainable global supplier management: The role of dynamic capabilities in achieving competitive advantage, Journal of Supply Chain Management. 2010; 46 (2): 45-63.

Meehan J, Bryde D. Sustainable procurement practice, Business Strategy & the Environment.2011; 20 (2): 94-106.

Fortuna ME, Simion IM, Gavrilescu M. Sustainability in environmental remediation, Environmental Engineering and Management Journal. 2011; 10(12): 1987-1996.

Robu B, Ioan CC, Robu E, Macoveanu M. European frame for sustainable agriculture in Romania: policies and strategies, Environmental Engineering and Management Journal. 2009; 8(5): 1171-1179.

Van der Zwan J. Green Public Procurement as environmental policy tool: A theoretical framework. Agenda for International Development, Working Paper, May; (2018). Available from: http://www.a-id.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Green_rpcurement_May_2018.pdf (accessed on 23 April 2020).

Cazan R. Green public procurement in Romania. Protection of the environment through responsible public spending, Bucharest; 2014. Available from: http://www.ecopolis.org.ro/media/Achizitii%20publice%20ecologice%20in%20romania-final.pdf(accessed on 11 March 2020).

EU. Assessment and Comparison of National Green and Sustainable Public Procurement Criteria and Underlying Schemes; 2010. Available online:

http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/Criteria%20and%20Underlying%20Schemes.pdf (accessed on 17 March 2020).

EU. Green Public Procurement Policy; 2014. Available from:

http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/WebinarGPP_DGENV_HealthCareSector.pdf(accessed on 20 October 2019).

Pagell M, Wu Z, Wasserman ME. Thinking differently about purchasing portfolios: An assessment of sustainable sourcing, Journal of Supply Chain Management. 2010; 46 (1): 57-73.

Curkovic S, Sroufe R. Using ISO 14001 to promote a sustainable supply chain strategy, Business Strategy and the Environment. 2011; 20(2): 71-93.

PricewaterhouseCoopers. Significant and Ecofys. Collection of statistical information on Green Public Procurement in the EU. Report on methodologies; 2009. Available from: http://www.ecofys.com/files/files/collectionofstatisticalinformationongpp-results.pdf (accessed on 11 April 2020).

Ewing E, Nuttall M. Assessment and Comparison of National Green and Sustainable Public Procurement Criteria and Underlying Schemes; 2010. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/studies_en.htm (accessed on 10 April 2020).

Renda A, Pelkmans J, Egenhofer C, Schrefler L, Luchetta G, Selçuki C, Ballesteros J, Zirnhelt AC. The uptake of green public procurement in the EU 27; 2012 Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/CEPS-CoE-GPP%20MAIN%20REPORT.pdf (accessed on 17 April 2020).

Barbuta M. Buy Smart Country Experiences: Romania, Bucharest; 2013. Available from: http://www.buy-smart.info/media/file/2427.BuySmart_CountryExperiences_Romania.pdf (accessed on 12 February 2020).

EC. Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors; 2004.

EC. Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts; 2004.

GR. Government Emergency Ordinance no. 34; 2006.

Batrinca M. Greening Public Procurement in Romania; 2011. Available from: http://www.difi.no/filearchive/mihaela-batrinca-pp-to-gpp-in-romania.pdf (accessed on 14 February 2020).

Popescu S, Dragomir M, Pitic D, Brad E. Method for competitive environmental planning, Environmental Engineering and Management Journal . 2012; 11 (4): 823-829.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-31

How to Cite

BOSTAN, I., ROMAN, T., & MANOLICA, A. (2020). Economic and Environmental Implications Determined by the Implementation of the New Principles and Norms Regard in Ggreen Public Procurement (GPP). European Journal of Law and Public Administration, 7(1), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/7.1/110