Current Problems and Trends of Integration Processes in Forensic Examination

Authors

  • Lyubov GRYNDEY Chernivtsi National University of Yuriy Fedkovych

Keywords:

Forensic examination, integration processes, complex forensic examination, forensic expert activity, theory of forensic examination, subject of forensic examination.

Abstract

The article is devoted to the disclosure of the current problems and tendencies of integration processes in the forensic examination. Forensic examination is essentially focused on the use of the achievements of various branches of scientific knowledge in the legal process, and therefore its very nature has an integrational character. Comprehensive forensic expert studies are the most complex forms of integration of specialized knowledge with the involvement of relevant specialists.
In the conditions of the criminal activity of new and especially dangerous forms, on the one hand, and the reform of the criminal justice bodies, the adaptation of Ukrainian legislation to the European one, on the other, the issue of ensuring Ukraine's justice with independent, qualified and focused on using the latest advances in science and technology forensic examination.
Under present conditions, forensic examination is becoming increasingly demanded during pre-trial investigation and judicial review of criminal proceedings, judicial review of cases in other types of proceedings. In this aspect, one of the most important tasks is to determine the nature of complex forensic research and to develop their theoretical and methodological principles.

References

Averyanova TV. Integration and differentiation of scientific knowledge as sources and bases of new methods of forensic examination. M: Acad. Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation

Averyanova T. Contents and characteristics of methods of forensic research. Alma-Ata: Kazakhstan, SRIFE.1991; 240: 232

Arocker LE. On the Ethics of the Forensic Expert. Forensics and Forensic Examination. Kiev: EPD MPS USSR; 1968, 5: 135-141.

Arocker LE. The essence of forensic examination. Forensic examination. M .: HS MPS RSFSR; 1966. Issue 1: 51-54.

Belkin RS., Wienberg AI. Criminalistics and Evidence. M.: Legal literature. 1969; 216: 104

Great Soviet Encyclopedia. 3rd edition. M .: SE; 1972. T. 10. 592: 96.

Voskoboinikov AE. System research: basic concepts, principles and methodology. Knowledge. Understanding. Skill; 2013. № 6, November - December. Available from: http://www.zpu-journal.ru/ezpu/2013/6/Voskoboinikov_Systems-Research/ (date of request: 16.05.2016).

Klymenko NI. Integration function of expertology. Theory and practice of forensic examination and forensic science. Kharkiv: Law; 2006 Issue 6: 117-124, 145.

Kondakov NI. Logical dictionary-reference book. 2nd edition, corrected and supplemented. M .: Nauka; 1975: 230

Mirsky D Ya. Subject and system of judicial phototechnical examination. Theoretical questions of fate. expertise. M.: RSRIFE; 1981. Issue 48: 44–68.

Mirsky D Ya., Rostov MN. Concept of object of forensic examination. Actual problems of the theory of forensic examination. M .: RSRIFE, 1984. Issue 44. P. 21–32. 219

Ozhegov SI. Dictionary of the Russian language. 18th edition. M .: Russian language; 1987: 271; Determination of the relative content of phenylglycol in strokes of pastes for ballpoint pens/E. A. Trosman, G. S. Bezhanishvili, P. B. Dallakyan, etc. Expert practice and new research methods. M .: RSRIFE, 1989. Issue 12: 1–8.

Saaty T, Kearns K. Analytical Planning. Organization of systems. 358 M .: Radio and communications; 1991: 46

Sichivitsa OM. Complex forms of science integration. M .: Higher School; 1983: 231

Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary /S. S. Averintsev, E. A. Arab-ogly, L. F. Ilichev and others. 2nd edition. M .: Soviet Encyclopedia; 1989: .370

Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary/ S. S. Averintsev, E. A. Arab-ogly, L. F.

Shlyakhov AR. About the subject of forensic examination. Some questions of the theory of forensic examination: theses of the scientific community at the 7th theoretical seminar - forensic readings, M .: SRIFE, June 26; 1975: 3–8.

Shlyakhov AR. About the subject of forensic examination. Some questions of the theory of forensic examination: theses of the scientific community at the 7th theoretical seminar - forensic readings, June 26; M .: SRIFE; 1975 3–8.

Viner J. The Customs Union Issue. N. Y.: Carnegie Endowment for 378 International Peace; 1950: 567.

Arockker LE. Judicial Ethics. Social legality; 1969. No. 9: 31-35.

Arocker LE. Essence of Forensic Examination. Forensic examination. M .: HS MPS RSFSR. 1966; 1: 51-54. 19.

Arocker L. E. Tactics and ethics of judicial interrogation. M .: Legal Literature, 1969; 120 : 98.

Walther JB. Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research. 1996. N 23(1)® Р® 3–43. 568.

Wiles PJD. Communist International Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1968: 2.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-11

How to Cite

GRYNDEY, L. (2019). Current Problems and Trends of Integration Processes in Forensic Examination. European Journal of Law and Public Administration, 6(2), 35-45. Retrieved from https://www.lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/ejlpa/article/view/2290